scholarly journals Evidence for scale up: the differentiated care research agenda

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 22024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Grimsrud ◽  
Ruanne V. Barnabas ◽  
Peter Ehrenkranz ◽  
Nathan Ford
2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-111
Author(s):  
Guilherme Fowler A. Monteiro

Purpose This paper aims to conduct an extensive review and advances a framework for the literature of high-growth firms (HGFs) and scale-ups. Design/methodology/approach This paper takes the form of a literature review. Findings The author makes three specific contributions. First, he presents a broad review of high growth in firms, shedding light on the different levels of analysis. Second, he advances a characterization of scale-up companies to enable a better basis for discussion. Finally, he identifies gaps in the existing literature and suggest paths for future research. Originality/value The interest in HGFs and those referred to as scale-ups has increased considerably in recent years. Despite this trend, existing studies still have conceptual divergences and a gap separating theoretical inputs from the actual experiences of entrepreneurs.


2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (01) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Catherine L. Backman ◽  
Linda C. Li

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
YaseenM Arabi ◽  
Yasser Mandourah ◽  
FahadM Al-Hameed ◽  
Khalid Maghrabi ◽  
MohammedS ALshahrani ◽  
...  

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A McCarthy ◽  
Megan E O'Brien ◽  
William R Rodriguez

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1251-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Mark Hirshon ◽  
Bhakti Hansoti ◽  
Mark Hauswald ◽  
Kinjal Sethuraman ◽  
Nancy Louise Kerr ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1336-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Stoner ◽  
Prashant Mahajan ◽  
Silvia Bressan ◽  
Samuel H. F. Lam ◽  
Corrie E. Chumpitazi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Cashmore ◽  
Daryl J. Higgins ◽  
Leah M. Bromfield ◽  
Dorothy A. Scott

A research-led reform strategy is urgently required in the field of child protection in Australia. While international research can be a valuable resource, a strong research base which is relevant to this country’s needs, legislation and service systems is essential. Two recent audits of Australian research completed over the past decade – one on out-of-home care and the other on child protection more broadly – have highlighted significant gaps in existing research. There is a number of important topics that have not been addressed – as well as an over-reliance on small-scale, qualitative studies and a very low level of funding for research. This paper explores these gaps and identifies crucial areas for development, encompassing: the development of a national child protection and out-of-home care research agenda; adequate funding for research, especially for multi-site, cross-jurisdictional studies; and closer collaboration between researchers, policymakers and practitioners to close the gap between what we know and what we do.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document