Perspectives on entry level residency training in podiatric medicine

1992 ◽  
Vol 82 (11) ◽  
pp. 554-559
Author(s):  
E Udris

The author presents information related to the structures of medical and podiatric residency training and statistical information regarding entry level residency positions in approved podiatric residency programs. The results of surveys of residency directors (1989 and 1990) and the residency community of interest (1990) conducted by the Council on Podiatric Medical Education are reported. Specific findings from the surveys indicated the desirability of establishing training sequences consisting of rotating podiatric residencies followed by specialty training programs but identified significant difficulties related to implementation.

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaiah Day ◽  
Andrew Lin

Background: In the past few years, quality assurance has become an increasingly important part of medical education for both Canadian and American training programs. Since this emphasis on quality assurance in residency programs is recent, most faculty members involved in teaching residents in dermatology training programs would not themselves have had experience with quality assurance. As a result, satisfying this requirement may be a challenge. Objectives: In this article, we review published reports in which various residency training programs have satisfied this requirement and propose projects in which dermatology residency training programs may satisfy quality assurance requirements. Methods: Using the key words residency, training, project, quality, assurance, improvement, medical errors, and safety, a literature search was conducted of English-language articles published after January 1990. Results/Conclusions: There are many innovative and effective ways program directors in dermatology training programs should be able to develop projects that improve patient care, enhance resident education, and fulfill accreditation requirements.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-338
Author(s):  
Russell J. Blattner

BECAUSE of the great variation and considerable confusion in designating the years of training in Intern and Residency Training Programs throughout the country, it was suggested by the Committee on Medical Education of the American Academy of Pediatrics, that a survey be undertaken to determine preference, if any, for a more standard form of nomenclature. Accordingly, an enquiry was sent to the Chiefs of Pediatrics of all hospitals listed in the Residency and Intern Number of the Journal of the A.M.A. (Sept. 26, 1953). The message sent out was: "There is need to standardize terminology used in designatimig the years of training in Intern and Residency Programs.


1992 ◽  
Vol 82 (11) ◽  
pp. 579-581
Author(s):  
AM Jacobs

The author takes the position that a mandatory fifth postgraduate year to serve as a uniform period of clinical education for podiatric medical graduates is unnecessary. A need exists to define primary podiatric medicine as the entry level podiatric medical field of practice. The colleges of podiatric medicine are urged to deemphasize podiatric surgery while placing greater emphasis on primary podiatric care. The author believes that the colleges are responsible for preparing primary podiatric medical practitioners. Residency programs should focus on specialty training in podiatric surgery and podiatric orthopedics.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-992
Author(s):  
NAOMI UCHIYAMA

To the Editor.— I am a member of the Committee on Women in Pediatrics of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The Committee recently studied the availability of flexible training and retraining programs in pediatric residency programs in the United States. We sent a questionnaire to the directors of the 292 pediatric training programs listed in the Directory of Residency Training Programs. At present, 200 of the 292 (68.5%) have a flexible training program. However, only two of these programs have this as a written policy; one such program was developed in 1973 and, in practice, this program was individually designed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-178
Author(s):  
Margaret Maria Cocks

Specialized residency training was still in its infancy in mid-20th century America. While specialty boards in various fields such as ophthalmology and otolaryngology had been established in the 1920s and 1930s, the details of training programs were still being fine-tuned and formal curricula were lacking. In dermatology, three prominent physicians including Harry L. Arnold Jr., J. Lamar Callaway and Walter B. Shelley trained during these experimental days of medical education. Each of them captured personal reflections of their own training experiences in brief memoirs published in scientific journals. A closer examination of these texts provides unique insights into how dermatology subspecialty training in particular and medical education more broadly evolved during this period.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e110-112
Author(s):  
Rebecca P. Pero ◽  
Laura Marcotte

In competency-based medical education (CBME), assessment is learner-driven; learners may fail to progress if assessments are not completed. The General Internal Medicine (GIM) program at Queen’s University uses an educational technique known as scaffolding in its assessment strategy. The program applies this technique to coordinate early assessments with specific scheduled learning experiences and gradually releases the responsibility for assessment initiation to residents. Although outcomes of this innovation are still under investigation, we feel it has been valuable in supporting resident assessment capture and timely progression through stages of training.  Other residency training programs could easily implement this technique to support the transition to Competency by Design.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
John MacIsaac

Point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) has had its applications expand rapidly over recent years and across several medical specialties. Enough so that is has become an essential skill in most residency training programs across Canada. Despite this, there is little to no structured POCUS training at the medical undergraduate level. The goal of this commentary is to briefly introduce the value of POCUS in medical education; the feasibility of its integration; current barriers to its introduction; and the potential for students to be a possible solution until faculty can introduce a formal undergraduate POCUS curriculum.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 986-989
Author(s):  
Garrett W Burnett ◽  
Anjan S Shah ◽  
Daniel J Katz ◽  
Christina L Jeng

BackgroundDespite a growing interest in simulated learning, little is known about its use within regional anesthesia training programs. In this study, we aimed to characterise the simulation modalities and limitations of simulation use for US-based resident and fellow training in regional anesthesiology.MethodsAn 18-question survey was distributed to regional anesthesiology fellowship program directors in the USA. The survey aimed to describe residency and fellowship program demographics, modalities of simulation used, use of simulation for assessment, and limitations to simulation use.ResultsForty-two of 77 (54.5%) fellowship directors responded to the survey. Eighty per cent of respondents with residency training programs utilized simulation for regional anesthesiology education, while simulation was used for 66.7% of fellowship programs. The most common modalities of simulation were gel phantom models (residency: 80.0%, fellowship: 52.4%) and live model scanning (residency: 50.0%, fellowship: 42.9%). Only 12.5% of residency programs and 7.1% of fellowship programs utilized simulation for assessment of skills. The most common greatest limitation to simulation use was simulator availability (28.6%) and funding (21.4%).ConclusionsSimulation use for education is common within regional anesthesiology training programs, but rarely used for assessment. Funding and simulator availability are the most common limitations to simulation use.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha Regenstein ◽  
John E. Snyder ◽  
Mariellen Malloy Jewers ◽  
Kiki Nocella ◽  
Fitzhugh Mullan

ABSTRACT Background  Despite considerable federal investment, graduate medical education financing is neither transparent for estimating residency training costs nor accountable for effectively producing a physician workforce that matches the nation's health care needs. The Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) program's authorization in 2010 provided an opportunity to establish a more transparent financing mechanism. Objective  We developed a standardized methodology for quantifying the necessary investment to train primary care physicians in high-need communities. Methods  The THCGME Costing Instrument was designed utilizing guidance from site visits, financial documentation, and expert review. It collects educational outlays, patient service expenses and revenues from residents' ambulatory and inpatient care, and payer mix. The instrument was fielded from April to November 2015 in 43 THCGME-funded residency programs of varying specialties and organizational structures. Results  Of the 43 programs, 36 programs (84%) submitted THCGME Costing Instruments. The THCGME Costing Instrument collected standardized, detailed cost data on residency labor (n = 36), administration and educational outlays (n = 33), ambulatory care visits and payer mix (n = 30), patient service expenses (n =  26), and revenues generated by residents (n = 26), in contrast to Medicare cost reports, which include only costs incurred by residency programs. Conclusions  The THCGME Costing Instrument provides a model for calculating evidence-based costs and revenues of community-based residency programs, and it enhances accountability by offering an approach that estimates residency costs and revenues in a range of settings. The instrument may have feasibility and utility for application in other residency training settings.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1149-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey Quintero Wolfe ◽  
James L West ◽  
Matthew A Hunt ◽  
Gregory J A Murad ◽  
W Christopher Fox ◽  
...  

Abstract Once the accepted norm during Harvey Cushing's time, the mantra of work to the exclusion of family and lifestyle is now recognized as deleterious to overall well-being. A number of neurosurgical residency training programs have implemented wellness programs to enhance the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of trainees and faculty. This manuscript highlights existing organized wellness education within neurosurgery residency programs in order to describe the motivations behind development, structure, and potential implementation strategies, cost of implementation, and identify successes and barriers in the integration process. This manuscript is designed to serve as a “how-to” guide for other programs who may identify a need in their own trainees and begins the discussion of how to develop wellness, leadership, grit, and resiliency within our future generation of neurosurgeons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document