scholarly journals Bakkebyråkratiets yttergrense. Hjemmetjenestens møte med eldre med psykiske helseproblemer

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 20� ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Skatvedt ◽  
Ellen Andvig ◽  
Bergljot Baklien

<strong>Street level bureaucracy’s outer limit. </strong><br /><strong>Home care service’s meeting with elderly people with mental health problems.</strong><br />This article illuminates framework for home care services’ work with older people with mental health problems living at home. We also focus upon which consequences the framework have upon home care service’s work and care for this group of elderly. The article is based on qualitative data from a municipality in Norway. Our findings point to the professionals’ experiences of limitations to provide holistic care and their various strategies for dealing with these. The professionals described a strong sense of commitment and shortcomings facing elderly with mental health problems. We call attention to a problem of responsivity, with consequences for both professionals and service users. By presenting professionals in home care service as "extreme street level bureaucrats", we expand Lipsky’s theory of street level bureaucrats. Home care service’s encounters with the this group of elderly is seen as the outer limit of street level bureaucracy, based on the major ethical dilemmas professionals experience in their daily work in connection with that they “shall not attend to” elderly’s mental health problems.

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Eadie

This study evaluated Evolve Therapeutic Services, an innovative Queensland, Australian programme employing a trauma-informed collaborative wrap-round model of care in combination with a flexible intervention approach that is individually tailored to children and young people in out-of-home care who present with complex and extreme behavioural and mental health problems. The sample consisted of 768 children and young people. Three measures, the Children's Global Assessment Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire were used to assess functioning via a pre-post treatment design. Outcomes were assessed by comparing pre and post-treatment mean scores using repeated-measurest-tests. For estimates of differences in the proportion of children and young people in the clinical range between pre and post-treatment the McNemar test was used. In addition, surveys were completed by carers and stakeholders. Results provided a demographic profile, clinical profile and pre and post-treatment comparisons. Results revealed significant improvements across a range of problem areas: general functioning and adjustment; antisocial behaviour; overactivity and poor attention; non-accidental self-injury; problems with scholastic and language skills; emotional symptoms; peer and family relationships; self-care and independence; and school attendance. Survey data supported the outcomes from the stakeholder-rated and carer-rated measures. Findings provide ongoing evidence for the effectiveness of the therapeutic intervention programme.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document