Creating a City for Workers

Author(s):  
Susanna F. Schaller ◽  
K. C. Wagner ◽  
Mildred E. Warner

This chapter addresses the duality of labor strategy in the child care sector with one case study of unions campaigning to expand their members' access to child care benefits, paired with a second case study of a union organizing a campaign that combined direct organizing of child care providers with public policy development. The first case study tells the story of how a highly feminized union representing health care workers won child care benefits in collective bargaining, subsequently campaigned as part of a multiunion fare benefit, and expanded access to child care for low- and middle-income wage earners. The second case follows a United Federation of Teachers (UFT)-driven labor-community campaign to organize home-based child care providers, which represent a low-wage segment of the child care workforce that has emerged in the context of privatization and voucherization.

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie C. Rusby ◽  
Laura B. Jones ◽  
Ryann Crowley ◽  
Keith Smolkowski ◽  
Chris Arthun

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-56
Author(s):  
Amanda McDougald Scott

Child care is expensive, and many parents struggle to afford care; furthermore, even though child care costs are high, child care providers in the United States (US) are not making a living wage. Child care professionals (ages 0-5 in child care homes or centers) earn less income than Kindergarten teachers, pre-K teachers, non-farm animal caretakers, and the US estimate of all workers’ annual median salary (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020a, 2020b). Workers in comparable professions are also usually offered benefits for their labor, which child care professionals are not (Kwon, 2019; National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team, 2020; Otten et al., 2019; Whitebook, McLean, Austin, & Edwards, 2018).  This often necessitates use of public assistance.  Because many child care workers are not provided access to health insurance or other health-related benefits through their employers, they must seek access to health care in other ways.  Additionally, turnover rates among child care workers are high, and wages and benefits are a large part of the reason why child care professionals leave their jobs (McDougald Scott, 2021a). This policy analysis (a) reviewed the current struggle (as of May 2021) that child care workers in the United States (in general) and South Carolina (in particular) experience compared with employees in other fields; and (b) explore options (particularly a Medicaid waiver option) that might improve the situation.  South Carolina (SC) is one of the 13 states that have not expanded Medicaid; most of the 13 states are in Southern United States (US) region, which makes an extrapolation of SC research reasonable.  Lessons learned from SC childcare data should reflect closely what may be found in other non-expansion states, but research from the literature review will not be SC-specific. Relevant peer-reviewed, government documents, state and national data, and grey literature were reviewed and analyzed. There have been ongoing efforts (although insufficient even in more successful efforts) with mixed results to improve the pay for child care workers for decades.  Progress for earning a living wage will require a systems overhaul for early education, but child care providers cannot wait for workforce environmental improvements.  Action must be taken now to augment the shortage of healthcare access for child care providers.  In SC, Medicaid helps some child care workers receive access to health care, but expansion through Medicaid waiver 1115 would include many more child care workers who do not currently have access. 


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet Bromer ◽  
Toni Porter ◽  
Lisa McCabe ◽  
Juliet Bromer ◽  
Amy Susman-Stillman

2020 ◽  
pp. 105381512093965
Author(s):  
Alison Hooper ◽  
Rena Hallam

This study examines the prevalence of home-based child care providers who report serving at least one child whom they identify as having a disability. Although many families choose home-based child care, researchers know very little about how many home-based providers care for young children with disabilities. Through secondary analysis of the National Survey of Early Care and Education (NSECE) data about home-based child care providers, we examined the prevalence and predictors of serving children with provider-reported disabilities among listed and unlisted home-based providers. Descriptive analyses showed that 21.7% of listed providers, 20.5% of unlisted paid providers, and 10.1% of unlisted unpaid providers reported serving at least one child whom they identified as having a disability. These providers reported relatively low rates of connecting families to outside resources and utilizing outside resources to support them in their work with children. Providers who reported higher enrollment and who received child care subsidies were more likely to report serving a child with a disability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document