scholarly journals Benefits for Child Care Workers: How the State Could Help through a Medicaid Waiver

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-56
Author(s):  
Amanda McDougald Scott

Child care is expensive, and many parents struggle to afford care; furthermore, even though child care costs are high, child care providers in the United States (US) are not making a living wage. Child care professionals (ages 0-5 in child care homes or centers) earn less income than Kindergarten teachers, pre-K teachers, non-farm animal caretakers, and the US estimate of all workers’ annual median salary (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020a, 2020b). Workers in comparable professions are also usually offered benefits for their labor, which child care professionals are not (Kwon, 2019; National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team, 2020; Otten et al., 2019; Whitebook, McLean, Austin, & Edwards, 2018).  This often necessitates use of public assistance.  Because many child care workers are not provided access to health insurance or other health-related benefits through their employers, they must seek access to health care in other ways.  Additionally, turnover rates among child care workers are high, and wages and benefits are a large part of the reason why child care professionals leave their jobs (McDougald Scott, 2021a). This policy analysis (a) reviewed the current struggle (as of May 2021) that child care workers in the United States (in general) and South Carolina (in particular) experience compared with employees in other fields; and (b) explore options (particularly a Medicaid waiver option) that might improve the situation.  South Carolina (SC) is one of the 13 states that have not expanded Medicaid; most of the 13 states are in Southern United States (US) region, which makes an extrapolation of SC research reasonable.  Lessons learned from SC childcare data should reflect closely what may be found in other non-expansion states, but research from the literature review will not be SC-specific. Relevant peer-reviewed, government documents, state and national data, and grey literature were reviewed and analyzed. There have been ongoing efforts (although insufficient even in more successful efforts) with mixed results to improve the pay for child care workers for decades.  Progress for earning a living wage will require a systems overhaul for early education, but child care providers cannot wait for workforce environmental improvements.  Action must be taken now to augment the shortage of healthcare access for child care providers.  In SC, Medicaid helps some child care workers receive access to health care, but expansion through Medicaid waiver 1115 would include many more child care workers who do not currently have access. 

Author(s):  
Arthur J. Frankel

The author discusses the current status of family day care, including its demographics, organization, regulations, quality-control issues, and relevant research on its effects on children, families, and child-care workers. Family day care is a pervasive underground child-care system that merits far more attention by the social work profession in state and national child-care policy considerations. Social workers are in a unique position to help family-day-care providers enter mainstream child care in the United States.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0192513X2110223
Author(s):  
Adrienne M. Davidson ◽  
Samantha Burns ◽  
Delaine Hampton ◽  
Linda White ◽  
Michal Perlman

Many children in Canada and the United States experience poor-quality child care on a regular basis. Under the rubric of “parent choice,” governments continue to permit a variety of licensed care providers (centers and homes) as well as unlicensed home child care providers. Research suggests, however, that parents are not well-informed consumers about child care services, unaware of even the basic characteristics of their child’s care. In this study, we provide findings from a latent profile analysis based on a conjoint survey conducted in Toronto, Canada to better understand the factors that influence parents’ decisions in selecting child care services. Based on responses from over 700 parents, we identify five classes of parents that reflect a range of preferences in selecting child care. However, most groups show a strong preference for licensed early childhood education and care (ECEC) options. Limitations of this study and implications for policy are discussed.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-181
Author(s):  
Joan Lombardi

This introductory paper has a threefold purpose: (1) to provide an overview of the various types of child care, any or all of which may be found in an individual American community; (2) to present some terminology that may be used repeatedly in the papers of this supplement; and (3) to begin to discuss the role of the medical community in child care. OVERVIEW OF CHILD CARE This topic may best be explored by discussing the process new parents go through to select child care and by describing some of the obstacles they may face. For those readers who are from the child care community, and therefore familiar with this information, these are problems that can be shared with the medical community in your area. Expectant parents may not begin to think about care until after their baby is born. It is often hard to anticipate the issues related to balancing work and family life until you are actually in the situation. Child care may not be included as a topic in childbirth classes, even though that is probably the first place that the options should be discussed. Once the child is born, a decision may have to be made within the first few weeks after birth, because parental leave is, unfortunately, not guaranteed in the United States. Parents may turn to the pediatrician for advice, but most often they talk with neighbors and friends about child care options. A growing number of parents are beginning to use local Child Care Resource and Referral organizations, which provide consumer education and referral to parents, as well as support and resources to child care providers, policy makers, and the private sector.


OTO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2094883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aman Prasad ◽  
Alyssa M. Civantos ◽  
Yasmeen Byrnes ◽  
Kevin Chorath ◽  
Seerat Poonia ◽  
...  

Objective Nonphysician health care workers are involved in high-risk patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic, placing them at high risk of mental health burden. The mental health impact of COVID-19 in this crucial population has not been studied thus far. Thus, the objective of this study is to assess the psychosocial well-being of these providers. Study Design National cross-sectional online survey (no control group). Setting Academic otolaryngology programs in the United States. Subjects and Methods We distributed a survey to nonphysician health care workers in otolaryngology departments across the United States. The survey incorporated a variety of validated mental health assessment tools to measure participant burnout (Mini-Z assessment), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7), distress (Impact of Event Scale), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire–2). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictive factors associated with these mental health outcomes. Results We received 347 survey responses: 248 (71.5%) nurses, 63 (18.2%) administrative staff, and 36 (10.4%) advanced practice providers. A total of 104 (30.0%) respondents reported symptoms of burnout; 241 (69.5%), symptoms of anxiety; 292 (84.1%), symptoms of at least mild distress; and 79 (22.8%), symptoms of depression. Upon further analysis, development of these symptoms was associated with factors such as occupation, practice setting, and case load. Conclusion Frontline otolaryngology health care providers exhibit high rates of mental health complications, particularly anxiety and distress, in the wake of COVID-19. Adequate support systems must be put into place to address these issues.


Author(s):  
Susanna F. Schaller ◽  
K. C. Wagner ◽  
Mildred E. Warner

This chapter addresses the duality of labor strategy in the child care sector with one case study of unions campaigning to expand their members' access to child care benefits, paired with a second case study of a union organizing a campaign that combined direct organizing of child care providers with public policy development. The first case study tells the story of how a highly feminized union representing health care workers won child care benefits in collective bargaining, subsequently campaigned as part of a multiunion fare benefit, and expanded access to child care for low- and middle-income wage earners. The second case follows a United Federation of Teachers (UFT)-driven labor-community campaign to organize home-based child care providers, which represent a low-wage segment of the child care workforce that has emerged in the context of privatization and voucherization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document