scholarly journals Dynamic Interaction Analysis between Maglev Train with Airgap Control Algorithm Based on Acceleration Feedback and Guideway

Author(s):  
Jin Ho Lee ◽  
Sung Il Kim
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (21-22) ◽  
pp. 2013-2025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dangxiong Wang ◽  
Xiaozhen Li ◽  
Lin Liang ◽  
Xiaowei Qiu

The structure of low-to-medium–speed maglev trains significantly differs from that of traditional wheel/rail trains, leading to significant differences between the coupling vibration mechanism of the train and bridge systems. To determine the vertical dynamic interaction of the low-to-medium–speed maglev train–bridge system, a dynamic interaction model was established and studied, based on a proportional–integral–derivative active suspension control system and modal superposition method. The simulation model was validated through bridge dynamic field tests on the Changsha low-to-medium–speed maglev commercial line. The vertical dynamic characteristics of the system were analyzed for bridges with different girder heights. Subsequently, the mechanism of the vertical resonance of the bridge induced by the maglev train was analyzed carefully. The results show that reducing the bridge rigidity increases the electromagnetic levitation force, thereby increasing the dynamic response. The low-speed resonance in the bridge is caused by the circulation loading frequency of the adjacent electromagnetic force, whereas the normal-speed resonance is induced by the self-frequency of the electromagnetic levitation force.


2003 ◽  
pp. 119-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masamichi SOGABE ◽  
Nobuyuki MATSUMOTO ◽  
Makoto TANABE ◽  
Yozo FUJINO ◽  
Hajime WAKUI ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 529 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Schroeder ◽  
M. M. Lewis ◽  
A. D. Kilpatrick ◽  
K. E. Moseby

Context Apex predators occupy the top level of the trophic cascade and often perform regulatory functions in many ecosystems. Their removal has been shown to increase herbivore and mesopredator populations, and ultimately reduce species diversity. In Australia, it has been proposed that the apex predator, the dingo (Canis dingo), has the potential to act as a biological control agent for two introduced mesopredators, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the feral cat (Felis catus). Understanding the mechanisms of interaction among the three species may assist in determining the effectiveness of the dingo as a control agent and the potential benefits to lower-order species. Aims To test the hypotheses that feral cats and foxes attempt to both temporally avoid dingoes and spatially avoid areas of high dingo use. Methods Static and dynamic interaction methodologies based on global positioning system (GPS) telemetry data were applied to test temporal and spatial interactions between the two mesopredators (n = 15) and a dingo pair (n = 2). The experimental behavioural study was conducted in a 37-km2 fenced enclosure located in arid South Australia. Key results The dynamic interaction analysis detected neither attraction nor avoidance between dingoes and cats or foxes at short temporal scales. There was no suggestion of delayed interactions, indicating that dingoes were not actively hunting mesopredators on the basis of olfactory signalling. However, static interaction analysis suggested that, although broad home ranges of cats and foxes overlapped with dingoes, core home ranges were mutually exclusive. This was despite similar habitat preferences among species. Conclusions We found that avoidance patterns were not apparent when testing interactions at short temporal intervals, but were manifested at larger spatial scales. Results support previous work that suggested that dingoes kill mesopredators opportunistically rather than through active hunting. Implications Core home ranges of dingoes may provide refuge areas for small mammals and reptiles, and ultimately benefit threatened prey species by creating mesopredator-free space. However, the potential high temporal variation in core home-range positioning and small size of mutually exclusive areas suggested that further work is required to determine whether these areas provide meaningful sanctuaries for threatened prey.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document