Vitamin D deficiency can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes in women

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (35) ◽  
pp. 15-15
Nutrients ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 443-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Olmos-Ortiz ◽  
Euclides Avila ◽  
Marta Durand-Carbajal ◽  
Lorenza Díaz

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (14) ◽  
pp. 2422-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burcu Kısa ◽  
Hatice Kansu-Celik ◽  
Tuba Candar ◽  
Esin Merve Erol Koc ◽  
Umit Yasemin Sert ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stefan Pilz ◽  
Armin Zittermann ◽  
Rima Obeid ◽  
Andreas Hahn ◽  
Pawel Pludowski ◽  
...  

Vitamin D deficiency is common and there exists a huge gap between recommended dietary vitamin D intakes and the poor vitamin D supply in the general population. While vitamin D is important for musculoskeletal health, there are accumulating data suggesting that vitamin D may also be important for fertility, pregnancy outcomes and lactation. Significant changes in vitamin D metabolism during pregnancy such as increased production of the “active vitamin D hormone” calcitriol support the important role of vitamin D in this setting. Observational studies show that vitamin D deficiency is a risk marker for reduced fertility and various adverse pregnancy outcomes and is associated with a low vitamin D content of breast milk. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) document that physiological vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy is safe and improves vitamin D and calcium status, thereby protecting skeletal health. Although certain RCTs and/or meta-analyses reported some other beneficial effects, it is still not clear whether vitamin D supplementation improves fertility or decreases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as low birth weight, pre-eclampsia and neonatal mortality, or reduces wheeze/asthma in the infants. Nevertheless, vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women is frequently required to achieve a sufficient vitamin D status as recommended by nutritional vitamin D guidelines. In this review, we provide an overview of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and large trials reporting clinical data on the role of vitamin D for fertility, pregnancy and lactation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (12) ◽  
pp. 2116-2128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie J. Nobles ◽  
Glenn Markenson ◽  
Lisa Chasan-Taber

AbstractVitamin D deficiency is common during pregnancy and higher in Hispanic as compared with non-Hispanic white women. However, the association between vitamin D deficiency and adverse pregnancy outcomes remains unclear and may vary across ethnic groups, in part because of genetic variation in the metabolism of vitamin D. Few studies have included Hispanic women. Therefore, we investigated this association among 237 participants in the Behaviors Affecting Baby and You Study, a randomised trial of an exercise intervention among ethnically diverse prenatal care patients in Massachusetts. Baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) was measured at 15·2 (sd 4·7) weeks’ gestation. Information on adverse pregnancy outcomes was abstracted from medical records. Mean 25(OH)D was 30·4 (sd 12·0) ng/ml; 53·2 % of participants had insufficient (<30 ng/ml) and 20·7 % had deficient (<20 ng/ml) 25(OH)D levels. After adjusting for month of blood draw, gestational age at blood draw, gestational age at delivery, age, BMI and Hispanic ethnicity, women with insufficient and deficient vitamin D had infants with birth weights 139·74 (se 69·16) g (P=0·045) and 175·52 (se 89·45) g (P=0·051) lower compared with women with sufficient vitamin D levels (≥30 ng/ml). Each 1 ng/ml increase in 25(OH)D was associated with an increased risk for gestational diabetes mellitus among Hispanic women only (relative risk 1·07; 95 % CI 1·03, 1·11) in multivariable analysis. We did not observe statistically significant associations between maternal vitamin D status and other pregnancy outcomes. Our findings provide further support for an adverse impact of vitamin D deficiency on birth weight in Hispanic women.


2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 2936-2948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rostami ◽  
Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani ◽  
Masoumeh Simbar ◽  
Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi ◽  
Sonia Minooee ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Despite evidence on the association between hypovitaminosis D and adverse pregnancy outcomes and the positive impact of vitamin D supplementation, no evidence exists supporting a universal screening program in pregnancy as part of routine prenatal care. Objective We sought to determine the effectiveness of a prenatal screening program on optimizing 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and preventing pregnancy complications. Also, to identify a safe regimen, we compared several regimens in a subgroup of vitamin D–deficient pregnant women. Design Two cities of Masjed-Soleyman and Shushtar from Khuzestan province, Iran, were selected as the screening and nonscreening arms, respectively. Within the screening arm, a randomized controlled trial was conducted on 800 pregnant women. Setting Health centers of Masjed-Soleyman and Shushtar cities. Patients or Participants Pregnant women aged 18 to 40 years. Intervention Women with moderate [25(OH)D, 10 to 20 ng/mL] and severe [25(OH)D, &lt;10 ng/mL] deficiency were randomly divided into four subgroups and received vitamin D3 (D3) until delivery. Main Outcome Measure Maternal concentration of 25(OH)D at delivery and rate of pregnancy complications Results After supplementation, only 2% of the women in the nonscreening site met the sufficiency level (&gt;20 ng/mL) vs 53% of the women in the screening site. Adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preterm delivery, were decreased by 60%, 50%, and 40%, respectively, in the screening site. A D3 injection in addition to monthly 50,000 IU maintenance therapy contributed the most to achievement of sufficient levels at delivery. Conclusions A prenatal vitamin D screening and treatment program is an effective approach in detecting deficient women, improving 25(OH)D levels, and decreasing pregnancy adverse outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document