scholarly journals National Resident Matching Program Performance Among US MD and DO Seniors in the Early Single Accreditation Graduate Medical Education Era

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W Kortz ◽  
Austin Vegas ◽  
Sean P Moore ◽  
Edwin McCray ◽  
Monica C Mureb ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4s) ◽  
pp. 169-176
Author(s):  
Jillian Andrada ◽  
Joyce Teo ◽  
Joel Neo ◽  
Helen Yeo ◽  
Lim Boon Leng

ABSTRACT Background ACGME-I requires sponsoring institutions (SIs) to have systematic oversight of program performance. This was initially carried out through annual review, however, maintaining compliance became a challenge for a large SI like Singapore Health Services (SingHealth) as the number of residency programs grew from 5 to 34 in 3 years. Objective We assessed the impact of quarterly monitoring using a dashboard on graduate medical education (GME) program performance and institutional oversight. Methods In 2014, the SingHealth GME Committee (GMEC) approved the dashboard covering 13 indicators with implication on program performance, resident/faculty performance, and finance. Indicators were given color-coded scoring for compliance, borderline compliance, or concern. From annual reporting, periodicity was increased quarterly with reports distributed to program directors, head of department, and academic clinical programs. Results Since implementation, programs consistently met or exceeded compliance standards in 11 of 13 indicators (84%), with 7 indicators (63%) showing upward trends. Programs with borderline scores in particular quarters showed improvement in subsequent quarters. By 2015, percentage compliance for the 3 dimensions of residents' perspectives were 1 to 2 points higher than the national compliance average. Of 19 programs undergoing ACGME-I accreditation in 2014, only 4 had citations in the foundational requirement. Institutional citations were resolved, with 0 citations in the reaccreditation site visit in 2015. Conclusions For a large SI, increased periodicity of program performance reporting from annual to quarterly effectively addressed the gaps in a timely fashion. Institutional performance also improved through the use of quantitative data aligned with institution and national performance indicators.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110042
Author(s):  
Jenny X. Chen ◽  
Shivani A. Shah ◽  
Vinay K. Rathi ◽  
Mark A. Varvares ◽  
Stacey T. Gray

Graduate medical education (GME) is funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services through both direct and indirect payments. In recent years, stakeholders have raised concerns about the growth of spending on GME and distribution of payment among hospitals. Key stakeholders have proposed reforms to reduce GME funding such as adjustments to statutory payment formulas and absolute caps on annual payments per resident. Otolaryngology departmental leadership should understand the potential effects of proposed reforms, which could have significant implications for the short-term financial performance and the long-term specialty workforce. Although some hospitals and departments may elect to reduce resident salaries or eliminate positions in the face of GME funding cuts, this approach overlooks the substantial Medicare revenue contributed by resident care and high cost of alternative labor sources. Commitment to resident training is necessary to align both the margin and mission of otolaryngology departments and their sponsoring hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document