scholarly journals Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Parturients with Abnormal Placentation: A Retrospective Study

Cureus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orhan Binici ◽  
Evren Büyükfırat
Author(s):  
Harpreet Kaur ◽  
Balpreet Kaur ◽  
Sarvjeet Kaur

Background: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy refers to the abdominal hysterectomy performed during or immediately after cesarean section or vaginal delivery, in a setting of life threatening haemorrhage. Over the past two decades, incidence of cesarean section has greatly increased which emerges as one of the cause for abnormal placentation in subsequent pregnancies thus resulting in increased incidence of haemorrhage. The unplanned nature of the surgery and acute blood loss renders the patient in a less than ideal situation to undergo such a dramatic surgery. Evaluation of risk factors, adequate resuscitation, involvement of senior obstetrician and timely decision for EPH in cases of refractory peripartum haemorrhage would help in significantly reducing the maternal mortality and morbidity. Objective was to study the association between cesarean section and emergency peripartum hysterectomy.  Methods: It is a retrospective study of all women who had undergone emergency peripartum hysterectomy between January 2015 to January 2018 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College, Faridkot. Incidence, indications, risk factors and complications of emergency peripartum hysterectomies (EPH) were recorded.Results: During three years period the overall incidence of EPH was 1.85 per 1000 deliveries.Conclusions: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy is a challenging procedure performed in obstetrics when all other conservative methods to control uterine haemorrhage have failed. With increased incidence of cesarean sections the cause of emergency peripartum hysterectomy has greatly shifted from uterine atony to abnormal placentation.  Abnormal placentation has now become the most commonly associated indication for EPH. Recognising and assessing patients at risk with appropriate and timely intervention would help in ensuring a better outcome in this otherwise difficult situation.


Hematology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 351-356
Author(s):  
Joyce Lai ◽  
Isvarya Venu ◽  
Ann Kinga Malinowski ◽  
Shital Gandhi ◽  
Anne McLeod ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Poornima M.

Background: Previous Cesarean section (CS) is one of the important causes of CS in subsequent pregnancies. Moreover, repeated cesarean sections increase maternal as well as perinatal morbidity and mortality. We conducted this study to find out outcome of pregnancies in women who had a history of previous CS.Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients of previous caesarean section for either maternal or fetal indications. The duration of study was 3 years. Total 215 patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The indications, maternal and neonatal outcome were studied from medical records of the patients. Statistical analysis was done using SSPE 22.0 software.Results: Out of 215 studied cases majority of the patients belonged to age group of 21-30 years (75.35%) and were 2nd gravida (61.86%). 164 (76.28%) patients attended ANC OPD at least for 3 times during pregnancy. 73 (33.95%) patients had Hb of less than 10 gms while blood transfusion was required to be given in 11 (5.12%) patients. cesarean section was required in 172 (80%) patients out of which 166 (77.21%) patients had undergone emergency LSCS while in 6 (2.79%) patients elective LSCS was done. Scar tenderness was the most common indication for repeat cesarean section. There was no maternal mortality in any patients while there was 1 still birth and 1 neonatal death.Conclusions: Previous cesarean section is one of the important causes of CS in subsequent pregnancies hence decision of doing CS, especially primigravida, must be taken in accordance with strict guidelines and the practice of “cesarean section on demand” should be discouraged.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-51
Author(s):  
Monica Gurung ◽  
Gehanath Baral

Aims: To find out the prevalence of adnexal mass during Cesarean Section, its management and histological profile.Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for 4 years from 2013 to 2017 at Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. There were 18993 Cesarean Sections out of 72263 total births screened for adnexal masses from operation theatre register and record section.Results: The incidence of adnexal mass during cesarean section was 0.31% (58 out of 18993). Among them 15.52 % diagnosed antenatally and 84.48 % were incidentally diagnosed during cesarean section. Among 58 cases, 6 (10%) were bilateral amounting to 64 adnexal masses among which 35 (54.69%) masses had cystectomy, 20 (31.25%) masses had oophorectomy, 6 (9.37%) had aspiration/ drilling done and 3(4.69 %) masses were left without intervention. Among those cases only 48 histopathological reports were available. All the masses were benign and the most common was benign mature cystic teratoma (34; 69.38 %) and the least common was fibroma (1; 2.04%).Conclusions:  Adnexal masses during cesarean section should undergo surgical removal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document