Breast Cancer Stage at the Time of Presentation: Clinicopathological Correlations

Author(s):  
Nada A. S. Alwan ◽  
Furat N. Tawfeeq ◽  
Mina H. Maallah ◽  
Safana A. Sattar
ESMO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 100055
Author(s):  
A. Toss ◽  
C. Isca ◽  
M. Venturelli ◽  
C. Nasso ◽  
G. Ficarra ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1696-1705
Author(s):  
Kathryn L. Dalton ◽  
Sheila N. Garland ◽  
Peggy Miller ◽  
Bret Miller ◽  
Cheri Ambrose ◽  
...  

Cancer patients vary in their comfort with the label “survivor”. Here, we explore how comfortable males with breast cancer (BC) are about accepting the label cancer “survivor”. Separate univariate logistic regressions were performed to assess whether time since diagnosis, age, treatment status, and cancer stage were associated with comfort with the “survivor” label. Of the 70 males treated for BC who participated in the study, 58% moderately-to-strongly liked the term “survivor”, 26% were neutral, and 16% moderately-to-strongly disliked the term. Of the factors we explored, only a longer time since diagnosis was significantly associated with the men endorsing a survivor identity (OR = 1.02, p = 0.05). We discuss how our findings compare with literature reports on the comfort with the label “survivor” for women with BC and men with prostate cancer. Unlike males with prostate cancer, males with BC identify as “survivors” in line with women with BC. This suggests that survivor identity is more influenced by disease type and treatments received than with sex/gender identities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 966-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pegdwende O. Dialla ◽  
Patrick Arveux ◽  
Samiratou Ouedraogo ◽  
Carole Pornet ◽  
Aurélie Bertaut ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Montella ◽  
Marina Buonanno ◽  
Edoardo Biondi ◽  
Anna Crispo ◽  
Mariarosaria De Marco ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262468
Author(s):  
Susanna Hilda Hutajulu ◽  
Yayi Suryo Prabandari ◽  
Bagas Suryo Bintoro ◽  
Juan Adrian Wiranata ◽  
Mentari Widiastuti ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate factors associated with delays in presentation and diagnosis of women with confirmed breast cancer (BC). Methods A cross-sectional study nested in an ongoing prospective cohort study of breast cancer patients at Dr Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, was employed. Participants (n = 150) from the main study were recruited, with secondary information on demographic, clinical, and tumor variables collected from the study database. A questionnaire was used to gather data on other socioeconomic variables, herbal consumption, number of healthcare visits, knowledge-attitude-practice of BC, and open-ended questions relating to initial presentation. Presentation delay (time between initial symptom and first consultation) was defined as ≥3 months. Diagnosis delay was defined as ≥1 month between presentation and diagnosis confirmation. Impact on disease stage and determinants of both delays were examined. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the length and distribution of delays by disease stage. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between delays, cancer stage and factors. Results Sixty-five (43.3%) patients had a ≥3-month presentation delay and 97 (64.7%) had a diagnosis confirmation by ≥1 month. Both presentation and diagnosis delays increased the risk of being diagnosed with cancer stage III-IV (odds ratio/OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.97–5.01, p = 0.059 and OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.28–7.19, p = 0.012). Visit to providers ≤3 times was significantly attributed to a reduced diagnosis delay (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.37, p <0.001), while having a family history of cancer was significantly associated with increased diagnosis delay (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.03–5.04, p = 0.042). The most frequent reasons for delaying presentation were lack of awareness of the cause of symptoms (41.5%), low perceived severity (27.7%) and fear of surgery intervention (26.2%). Conclusions Almost half of BC patients in our setting had a delay in presentation and 64.7% experienced a delay in diagnosis. These delays increased the likelihood of presentation with a more advanced stage of disease. Future research is required in Indonesia to explore the feasibility of evidence-based approaches to reducing delays at both levels, including educational interventions to increase awareness of BC symptoms and reducing existing complex and convoluted referral pathways for patients suspected of having cancer.


Author(s):  
Pei-Ling Tsai ◽  
Ting-Ting Kuo ◽  
Chih-Hung Ku ◽  
Guo-Shiou Liao ◽  
Chi-Kang Lin ◽  
...  

This study aimed to explore the relationship between self-esteem and mental adjustment and examine the directional effects in patients with breast cancer using path modeling. This was a cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study. A total of 128 patients with breast cancer were selected through convenience sampling at a medical center in northern Taiwan. They completed a basic characteristics questionnaire, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale short form, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale. Descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and path analysis were used to analyze the data. The results showed that higher self-esteem was associated with better mental adjustment (β = 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.6~1.3, p < 0.001). Age, religious beliefs, employment, cancer stage, and symptom distress were correlated with mental adjustment. Path modeling demonstrated that self-esteem, cancer stage, performance status, and symptom distress directly affected mental adjustment in patients with breast cancer. These findings suggest that health professionals should evaluate self-esteem, performance status, and symptom distress in patients with breast cancer immediately upon admission. This can facilitate early implementation of relevant nursing interventions and, consequently, improve self-esteem and symptom distress and increase mental adjustment in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document