Determining the Intravenous Medication Administration Errors and Trying to Find Solutions

Author(s):  
Omar Abdulwahid Salih Al-ani
2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 6 ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tezeta Fekadu ◽  
Mebrahtu Teweldemedhin ◽  
Eyerusalem Esrael ◽  
Solomon Weldegebreal Asgedom

Author(s):  
OMAR ABDULWAHID SALIH AL-ANI

Objective: Intravenous errors are one of the most frequent and common medical errors, but no direct causes found. The theory of human error is the most common expression of errors in hospitals, and this can endanger the lives of patients. This research study aims to identify the errors in the vein and try to find solutions to avoid those errors where the study conducted on a sample of hospitals in Baghdad. Methods: The study conducted to improve health quality in some hospitals. During the study period, a group of severe cases was detected, which based on intravenous infusions. Patients’ data and information were collected through five sources, examined and documented venous errors found and placed in a standard classification according to an incorrect dose and incorrect medication. The incorrect dose includes the following: Overdose, extra dose, underdose, wrong strength, and wrong form. Results: During the period of study, a total of 99 cases, among these cases, 52 incorrect medications include (drug-drug interaction, drug-disease interaction, and not indicated medication) the incorrect dose 42 and route of administration and incorrect rate also take place in mistakes. Conclusion: Intravenous errors can cause significant harm to patients and health-care providers, so proper attention paid to them. Several reasons may cause medication errors such as lack of experience and knowledge of health-care providers, inaccurate communications that do not explain the drug, and the exact dose. The prescribing errors in the medication or dosage were collected, discussed, and clarified so that the risks arising from them observed so that health-care providers and hospital specialists would be alerted and the study would serve as an alarm for health organizations.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e019648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette Schutijser ◽  
Joanna Ewa Klopotowska ◽  
Irene Jongerden ◽  
Peter Spreeuwenberg ◽  
Cordula Wagner ◽  
...  

ObjectivesMedication administration errors with injectable medication have a high risk of causing patient harm. To reduce this risk, all Dutch hospitals implemented a protocol for safe injectable medication administration. Nurse compliance with this protocol was evaluated as low as 19% in 2012. The aim of this second evaluation study was to determine whether nurse compliance had changed over a 4-year period, what factors were associated over time with protocol compliance and which strategies have been implemented by hospitals to increase protocol compliance.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, conducted between November 2015 and September 2016, nurses from 16 Dutch hospitals were directly observed during intravenous medication administration. Protocol compliance was complete if nine protocol proceedings were conducted correctly. Protocol compliance was compared with results from the first evaluation. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations over time between explanatory variables and complete protocol compliance. Implemented strategies were classified according to the five components of the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model.ResultsA total of 372 intravenous medication administrations were observed. In comparison with 2012, more proceedings per administration were conducted (mean 7.6, 95% CI 7.5 to 7.7 vs mean 7.3, 95% CI 7.3 to 7.4). No significant change was seen in complete protocol compliance (22% in 2016); compliance with the proceedings ‘hand hygiene’ and ‘check by a second nurse’ remained low. In contrast to 2012, the majority of the variance was caused by differences between wards rather than between hospitals. Most implemented improvement strategies targeted the organisation component of the SEIPS model.ConclusionsCompliance with ‘hand hygiene’ and ‘check by a second nurse’ needs to be further improved in order to increase complete protocol compliance. To do so, interventions focused on nurses and individually tailored to each ward are needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumiko O Schnock ◽  
Patricia C Dykes ◽  
Jennifer Albert ◽  
Deborah Ariosto ◽  
Rosemary Call ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document