scholarly journals Evaluation of Plotting Position Formulae for Pearson Type 3 Distribution in Three Hydrological Stations on the Niger River

2021 ◽  
pp. 117-128
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Simulated Series ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Individual Scores ◽  
Type 3 ◽  
River Niger ◽  
Relative Root

In this study, eight unbiased plotting position formulae recommended for Pearson Type 3 distribution were evaluated by comparing the simulated series of each formula with the annual maximum series (AMS) of River Niger at Baro, Koroussa and Shintaku hydrological stations, each having data length of 51years, 53 years and 58 years respectively. The parameters of Pearson Type 3 distribution were computed by the method of moments with corrections for skewness. While the fitting of Pearson Type 3 distribution proceeds with the development of flood – return period (Q-T) relationship, followed by application of the derived Q- T relation to compute simulated discharges for comparison with AMS of the study stations. The plotting position formulae were evaluated on the basis of optimum values of the statistically goodness-of-fit of probability plot correlation coefficient (PPCC), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), mean absolute error (MAE) and Nash-sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), across the stations. The plotting position formulae were ranked on scale of 1 to 8. Thus a plotting formula that best simulates the empirical observations using the goodness-of-measures was scored “1” and so on. The individual scores per plotting position were summed across the gof tests to obtain the total score.    The study show that Chegodayev is the best plotting position formula for Baro, Weibull is the best plotting position Formula for Kourassou and Shintaku hydrological stations. The overall performances of the eight plotting position formulae across the hydrological stations show that weibull distribution is the overall best having scored 27, seconded by Chegodayev with 30 and thirdly, Beard with 38. The Pearson Type 3 distribution had been found one of the best probability distribution model of flood flow in Nigeria and this study was conducted to gain in-depth knowledge of the distribution. Finally, this study recommends extension of the studies to Log-Pearson Type 3 distribution.

scholarly journals Study of Unbiased Plotting Position Formulae for the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) Distribution

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 94-99
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Distribution Model ◽  
Hydraulic Structures ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Gev Distribution ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Type 3 ◽  
Best Fit ◽  
River Niger ◽  
Annual Maximum Series

The determination of appropriate quantile relations between the magnitude of extreme events and the corresponding exceedance probabilities is a prerequisite for optimum design of hydraulic structures. Various plotting position formulae have been proposed for estimating the exceedance probabilities or recurrence in. In this study, eight plotting position formulae recommended for GEV distribution were used for estimating the exceedance probabilities of annual maximum series of River Niger at Baro, Kouroussa and Shintaku hydrological stations. The performance measures of PPCC, RRMSE, PBIAS, MAE and NSE were calculated by applying their individual equations to each pair of observed AMS, arranged in ascending order, and exceedance probabilities calculated using each plotting positions. The result of the study show that Weibull was the best plotting position formula, seconded by Beard and thirdly, In – na and Ngugen. This study underscores the necessity to accurately size water infrastructure. In a recent paper, the author found GEV distribution the best – fit probability distribution model in Nigeria. Thus, the need to develop indepth understanding and accurate estimation of exceedance probabilities and return periods using the GEV distribution. Furthermore, this paper recommends similar studies to be conducted for Pearson Type 3(PR3) and Log Pearson Type 3 (LP3) distributions.

scholarly journals Flood Flow Probability Distribution Model Selection on Niger/Benue River Basins in Nigeria

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-94
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
River Basins ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Best Fit

Flood frequency analysis is a crucial component of flood risk management which seeks to establish a quantile relationship between peak discharges and their exceedance (or non-exceedance) probabilities, for planning, design and management of infrastructure in river basins. This paper evaluates the performance of five probability distribution models using the method of moments for parameter estimation, with five GoF-tests and Q-Q plots for selection of best –fit- distribution. The probability distributions models employed are; Gumbel (EV1), 2-parameter lognormal (LN2), log Pearson type III (LP3), Pearson type III(PR3), and Generalised Extreme Value( GEV). The five statistical goodness – of – fit tests, namely; modified index of agreement (Dmod), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), Nash – Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Percent bias (PBIAS), ratio of RMSE and standard deviation of the measurement (RSR) were used to identify the most suitable distribution models. The study was conducted using annual maximum series of nine gauge stations in both Benue and Niger River Basins in Nigeria. The study reveals that GEV was the best – fit distribution in six gauging stations, LP3 was best – fit distribution in two gauging stations, and PR3 is best- fit distribution in one gauging station. This study has provided a significant contribution to knowledge in the choice of distribution models for predicting extreme hydrological events for design of water infrastructure in Nigeria. It is recommended that GEV, PR3 and LP3 should be considered in the development of regional flood frequency using the existing hydrological map of Nigeria.

scholarly journals Selection Selection of Probabilistic Model of Extreme Floods in Benue River Basin, Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-18
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Probabilistic Model ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Extreme Floods ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Selection Of

The selection of optimum probabilistic model of extreme floods as a crucial step for flood frequency analysis has remained a formidable challenge for the scientific and engineering communities to address. Presently, there is no scientific consensus about the choice of probability distribution model that would accurately simulate flood discharges at a particular location or region. In practice, several probability distributions are evaluated, and the optimum distribution is then used to establish the design quantile - probability relationship. This paper presents the evaluation of five probability distributions models; Gumbel (EV1), 2-parameter lognormal (LN2), log Pearson type III (LP3), Pearson type III(PR3), and Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) using the method of moments (MoM) for parameter estimation and annual maximum series of four hydrological stations in Benue River Basin in Nigeria. Additionally, Q-Q plots were used to compliment the selection process. The choice of optimum probability distribution model was based on five statistical goodness – of – fit measures; modified index of agreement (Dmod), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), Nash – Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Percent bias (PBIAS), ratio of RMSE and standard deviation of the measurement (RSR). Goodness – of – fit assessment reveals that GEV is the best – fit distribution, seconded by PR3 and thirdly, LP3. In comparison with WMO (1989) survey of countries on distribution types currently in use for frequency analysis of extremes of floods shows that GEV is standard in one country, while PR3 is a standard in 7 countries, and LP3 is standard in 7 countries. It is recommended that GEV, PR3 and LP3 should be considered in the final selection of optimum probability distribution model in Nigeria.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Probability Distribution Models of Flood flow in Lower Niger Basin

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Optimum Distribution ◽  
Water Resources Systems ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Pearson Type

The choice of optimum probability distribution model that would accurately simulate flood discharges at a particular location or region has remained a challenging problem to water resources engineers. In practice, several probability distributions are evaluated, and the optimum distribution is then used to establish the quantile - probability relationship for planning, design and management of water resources systems, risk assessment in flood plains and flood insurance. This paper presents the evaluation of five probability distributions models: Gumbel (EV1), 2-parameter lognormal (LN2), log pearson type III (LP3), Pearson type III(PR3), and Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) using the method of moments (MoM) for parameter estimation and annual maximum series of five hydrological stations in the lower Niger River Basin in Nigeria. The choice of optimum probability distribution model was made on five statistical goodness – of – fit measures; modified index of agreement (Dmod), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), Nash – Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Percent bias (PBIAS), ratio of RMSE and standard deviation of the measurement (RSR), and probability plot correlation coefficient (PPCC). The results show that GEV is the optimum distribution in 3 stations, and LP3 in 2 stations. On the overall GEV is the best – fit distribution, seconded by PR3 and thirdly, LP3. Furthermore, GEV simulated discharges were in closest agreement with the observed flood discharges. It is recommended that GEV, PR3 and LP3 should be considered in the final selection of optimum probability distribution model in Nigeria.

scholarly journals Modelling Rainfall Intensity by Optimization Technique in Abeokuta, South-West, Nigeria

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
A. O. David ◽  
Ify L. Nwaogazie ◽  
J. C. Agunwamba
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Rainfall Intensity ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Optimization Technique ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Test ◽  
Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Type 3

The design of water resources engineering control structures is best achieved with adequate estimation of rainfall intensity over a particular catchment. To develop the rainfall intensity, duration and frequency (IDF) models, 25 year daily rainfall data were collected from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET) Abuja for Abeokuta. The annual maximum rainfall amounts with durations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 420 minutes were extracted and subjected to frequency analysis using the Excel Optimization Solver wizard. Specific and general IDF models were developed for return periods of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 years using the Gumbel Extreme Value Type -1 and Log Pearson Type -3 distributions. The Anderson-Darling goodness of fit test was used to ascertain the best fit probability distribution. The R2 values range from 0.973 – 0.993 and the Mean Squared Error, MSE from 84.49 – 134.56 for the Gumbel and 0.964 – 0.997 with MSE of 42.88 – 118.68 for Log Pearson Type -3 distribution, respectively. The probability distribution models are recommended for the prediction of rainfall intensities for Abeokuta metropolis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Generalized Extreme (GEV), Log-Pearson Type 3 (LP3), Pearson Type 3(P3) and Gumbel (EV1) Distributions for Development of IDF Equations for Warri, Nigeria

2021 ◽  
pp. 386-395
Author(s):  
Itolima Ologhadien
Keyword(s):  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Economic Losses ◽  
Precipitation Series ◽  
Return Periods ◽  
Water Drainage ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Idf Curves ◽  
Type 3

The application of Gumbel (EVI) to the development of rainfall intensity– duration – frequency (IDF) curves has often been criticized on theoretical and empirical grounds as it may underestimate the largest extreme rainfall amounts. The consequences of underestimation are economic losses, property damages, and loss of life. Therefore, it is important that water resources engineering infrastructure be accurately design to avoid these consequences. This paper evaluates the performances of four probability distributions; GEV, EV1, LP3 and P3 using the annual maxima precipitation series of 26 years for Warri Metropolis obtained from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet). The strength and weakness of the four probability distributions were examined with the goodness of fit (GOF) module of Easyfit software which implemented Kolmogorov - Smirnov (KS) and Anderson - Darling (AD) tests at 5% significance level. The Easyfit software fitted the precipitation series data to the four probability distributions and ranked the four probability distributions across the fifteen rainfall durations. Results show that for both KS and AD tests, GEV distribution was found to be best-fit distribution and it was applied to the development of IDF curves in Warri Metropolis, Nigeria. Furthermore, the IDF values obtained were applied in the development of three-parameter IDF models for return periods of 10 - , 15 -, 20 -, 25 - , 50 -, and 100-years. The mean absolute error, Nash – Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) indices computed for the IDF models increase with increasing return periods. The IDF curves and models depicted the general attributes of IDF curves and models. This study could be of significant academic value and improvement to professional practice in the design of storm water drainage systems. Therefore, the developed IDF curves and models are recommended to the Warri Urban Authority for inclusion in her stormwater handbooks and manuals.

scholarly journals Development of Models for Rainfall Intensity- duration-frequency for Akure, South-west, Nigeria

2019 ◽  
pp. 457-466
Author(s):  
A. O. David ◽  
Ify L. Nwaogazie ◽  
J. C. Agunwamba
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Rainfall Intensity ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Test ◽  
Maximum Rainfall ◽  
Pearson Type ◽  
Intensity Duration Frequency ◽  
Type 3

The rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) relationship is widely used for adequate estimation of rainfall intensity over a particular catchment. A 25 year daily rainfall data were collected from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET) Abuja for Akure station. Twenty five year annual maximum rainfall amounts with durations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 420 minutes were extracted and subjected to frequency analysis using the excel solver software wizard. A total of six (6) return period specific and one (1) general IDF models were developed for return periods of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 years using Gumbel Extreme Value Type-1 and Log Pearson Type -3 distributions. Anderson Darling goodness of fit test was used to ascertain the best fit probability distribution. The R2 values range from 0.982 to 0.985 for GEVT -1 and 0.978 to 0.989 for Log Pearson type -3 while the Mean Squared Error from 33.56 to 156.50 for GEVT -1 and 43.01 to 150.63 Log Pearson Type III distributions respectively. The probability distribution models are recommended for the prediction of rainfall intensities for Akure metropolis.

scholarly journals Mathematical pattern of Kessler psychological distress distribution in the general population of the U.S. and Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Tomitaka ◽  
Toshiaki A. Furukawa
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
General Population ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Quadratic Function ◽  
The United States ◽  
Depression Screening ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Epidemiological Surveys ◽  
Screening Scale

Abstract Background Although the 6-item Kessler psychological scale (K6) is a useful depression screening scale in clinical settings and epidemiological surveys, little is known about the distribution model of the K6 score in the general population. Using four major national survey datasets from the United States and Japan, we explored the mathematical pattern of the K6 distributions in the general population. Methods We analyzed four datasets from the National Health Interview Survey, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in the United States, and the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions in Japan. We compared the goodness of fit between three models: exponential, power law, and quadratic function models. Graphical and regression analyses were employed to investigate the mathematical patterns of the K6 distributions. Results The exponential function had the best fit among the three models. The K6 distributions exhibited an exponential pattern, except for the lower end of the distribution across the four surveys. The rate parameter of the K6 distributions was similar across all surveys. Conclusions Our results suggest that, regardless of different sample populations and methodologies, the K6 scores exhibit a common mathematical distribution in the general population. Our findings will contribute to the development of the distribution model for such a depression screening scale.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document