scholarly journals Prognostic Factors for Successful Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (Micro-TESE)

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-35
Author(s):  
Mohamed Hamdy Mashaly ◽  
Tarek Ahmed Gamil ◽  
Maged Moustafa Ragab ◽  
Mohamed Abo El-Enen Ghalwash
Keyword(s):  
Semen Analysis ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Seminiferous Tubules ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Detailed Medical History

Background: There are some men suffer from infertility, non-obstructive azoospermia is one of the causes of infertility, these men need sperm retrieval from testes like microdissection testicular sperm extraction (Micro-TESE). This work aims to assess the different preoperative and intraoperative factors that predict successful sperm retrieval with Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (Micro-TESE) in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Methods: Our study is a cohort prospective one, conducted on 52 male patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who attended to the outpatient andrology and infertility clinic of Urology Department, Tanta University Hospitals during the period between December2018 to November2019. All patients were subjected to detailed medical history, physical examination, two semen analysis on two different laboratories. Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction is performed to all patients after Estimation of serum FSH, LH, testosterone, prolactin, estradiol and scrotal Doppler ultrasonography Results: From 52 patients who have done, Patients were divided in to 2 groups according to the result of Micro-TESE procedure: negative SSR group (28 patients) and positive SSR group (24 patients).In comparison between the two groups according to preoperative factors as age, FSH, LH, estradiol, testosterone, prolactin and testicular volume, there was no significant difference between these groups. On comparison of intraoperative size of seminiferous tubules in relation to results of Micro-TESE, we found that presence of large convoluted seminiferous tubules was statistically significant in prediction of successful sperm retrieval with Micro-TESE Conclusions: The chances of sperm retrieval in men with NOA by Micro-TESE are not related to preoperatively age, FSH, LH, testosterone, estradiol, prolactin and testicular volume. The detection of large seminiferous tubules intraoperatively is a good predictor for successful sperm retrieval with Micro-TESE as it was statistically significant.

scholarly journals Endocrine Tests and/or Testicular Volume Are Not Predictive of Successful Sperm Retrieval by Multiple Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh Tam Le ◽  
Thanh Tam Thi Nguyen ◽  
Dac Nguyen Nguyen ◽  
Nhu Quynh Thi Tran ◽  
Quoc Huy Vu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Sperm Aspiration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Testicular Sperm Aspiration

Abstract Objectives: This study aimed to determine the role of pre-surgical markers in the prediction of sperm retrieval in infertile Vietnamese men with azoospermia. Patients and Methods:Retrospective descriptive analysis of 136 infertile men with azoospermia, examined from August 2014 to July 2018. Patients underwent stepwise surgical sperm retrieval via percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular sperm aspiration then multiple testicular sperm extraction in up to 3 locations until sperm were detected. Factorswere analyzed to determine the prediction of sperm retrieval.Results: The overall success rate of sperm retrieval was 49.3% including 88.3% and 18.4% in the OA and NOA group, respectively. The results of sperm retrieval were significantly associated only with the OA and NOA group, not with endocrine test or testicular volume. We found no significant difference in the endocrine test and testicular volume’s result between successful and unsuccessful sperm retrieval in either group.Conclusions: Neither an endocrine test nor testicular volume should be used for predicting the results of surgical sperm retrieval in infertile Vietnamese males with azoospermia.

Can Testicular Size Be a Predictive Factor for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non Obstructive Azoospermia?

2019 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Omer Yumusak ◽  
Mehmet Cinar ◽  
Serkan Kahyaoglu ◽  
Yasemin Tasci ◽  
Gul Nihal Buyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Total Testosterone ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Stimulating Hormone

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> Non-obstructive azoospermia, defined as absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate caused by impaired spermatogenesis, is the most severe cause of male infertility. It is typically presented as high serum follicle stimulating hormone levels and atrophic testis. The combination of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and Microdissection testicular sperm extraction allows these infertile men the opportunity to have their own children from their own testis. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of micro-Testicular sperm extraction in men with atrophic testis.</p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> The medical records of 80 non-obstructive men with azoospermia who underwent micro-TESE were retrospectively evaluated. We assessed clinical parameters; age, duration of infertility, smoking, chromosomal karyotype, Y chromosome microdeletion, follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, total testosterone and testicular volume in relation with Microdissection testicular sperm extraction results.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Testicular sperm retrieval rate was 53% in 80 patients. Testicular volume, serum follicle stimulating hormone and total testosterone concentrations showed correlation with the results of sperm retrieval. These three parameters were found to be significant risk factors with testicular sperm extraction negative patients (p&lt;0.001). The odds ratios (95% CI) were 6.39 (1.25–26.58), 1.24 (1.11-1.36), 1.13 (0.99-1.21) respectively. Testicular volume was found to be a discriminative parameter in patients with negative sperm retrieval. The cut-off point was established as 6.75 ml for testicular volume with 88.1% sensitivity, 62.1% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Microdissection testicular sperm extraction is the most effective procedure for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Testicular volume, serum follicle stimulating hormone and testosterone levels can be predictive factors for sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.</p>

Predictive Factors for Sperm Retrieval in Males With Non-obstructive Azoospermia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Hsun Hsu ◽  
Marcelo Chen ◽  
Pai-Kai Chiang ◽  
Wei-Kung Tsai ◽  
Allen W Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sertoli Cell ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Retrieval Rate ◽  
Normal Spermatogenesis

Abstract The aim of the current study was to investigate the predictive markers for males with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) before they received conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE) or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE). Between January 2010 and December 2020, a total of 56 patients who received cTESE or microTESE surgery at the Urology department of the MacKay Memorial Hospital were included. Our univariate analysis revealed that the following parameters was associated with sperm retrieval: Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, testicular volume, histopathology of maturation arrest and Sertoli cell-only. The multivariate analysis showed that Sertoli cell-only was significantly less likely to harvest spermatozoa than normal spermatogenesis (OR = 0.03 (0.002-0.42); p = 0.01). A comparison of cTESE and microTESE revealed that the overall successful sperm retrieval rate was not significantly different between the two methods (74.1% vs. 58.6, p = 0.22). This study demonstrated that lower levels of FSH, LH and prolactin, and a higher testicular volume and better histopathology were associated with a higher sperm retrieval rate in the univariate analysis. In the multivariable analysis, only Sertoli cell-only syndrome appeared to have a significantly negative effect on the successful harvesting of sperm when compared with normal spermatogenesis.

scholarly journals Predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed mTESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Long-term experience at a single institute

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Yücel ◽  
Salih Budak ◽  
Mehmet Zeynel Keskin ◽  
Erdem Kisa ◽  
Zafer Kozacioglu
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Retrieval Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Long Term Experience

Objective: To observe the clinical practice of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and to determine the factors that may predict the presence of spermatozoa in preoperative salvage mTESE. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 445 patients with the diagnosis of NOA, who had undergone the mTESE operation consecutively in our institution between the dates of March 2008 and June 2017. The study included a total of 49 patients with failure to detect spermatozoa in the first mTESE and who had then undergone salvage mTESE. In order to investigate the factors that predict the result of salvage mTESE, the patients were classified into two groups according to the outcome of salvage mTESE, as those with and without spermatozoa retrieval. Patients in these two groups were compared with regard to age, body mass index, history of varicocele, history of cryptorchidism, duration of infertility, outcomes of genetic analysis, results of hormone profiles and the testicular histopathology results of the first mTESE. Results: The sperm retrieval rate following salvage mTESE was observed to be 42.8%. Statistically a significant difference was determined between the mean follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) values of the groups (p = 0.013). No significant difference was observed between the groups with regard to the remaining parameters.Conclusion: It was observed that among the factors that predict the success of sperm retrieval in salvage mTESE in patients with NOA and previous unsuccessful sperm retrieval in mTESE operation, only the pre-operative FSH level was observed to significantly correlate with the success in salvage mTESE.

scholarly journals Two Decades from the Introduction of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: How This Surgical Technique Has Improved the Management of NOA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1374
Author(s):  
Nahid Punjani ◽  
Caroline Kang ◽  
Peter N. Schlegel
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Tissue ◽  
Seminiferous Tubules ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Patient Optimization

The treatment of men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) has improved greatly over the past two decades. This is in part due to the discovery of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), but also significantly due to improvements in surgical sperm retrieval methods, namely the development of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). This procedure has revolutionized the field by allowing for identification of favorable seminiferous tubules while simultaneously limiting the amount of testicular tissue removed. Improving sperm retrieval rates is imperative in this cohort of infertile men as there are a limited number of factors that are predictive of successful sperm retrieval. Currently, sperm retrieval in NOA men remains dependent on surgeon experience, preoperative patient optimization and teamwork with laboratory personnel. In this review, we discuss the evolution of surgical sperm retrieval methods, review predictors of sperm retrieval success, compare and contrast the data of conventional versus mTESE, share tips for optimizing sperm retrieval outcomes, and discuss the future of sperm retrieval in men with NOA.

Evaluation of neoadjuvant gonadotropin administration with downregulation by testosterone prior to second time microsurgical testicular sperm extraction: A prospective case–control study

2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-190
Author(s):  
Medhat Kamel Amer ◽  
Hossam ElDin Hosni Ahmed ◽  
Sameh Fayek GamalEl Din ◽  
Ahmed Fawzy Megawer ◽  
Ahmed Ragab Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Hormone Levels ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stimulating Hormone

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether there is a beneficial role of combining gonadotropin administration with testosterone downregulation in non-obstructive azoospermia patients prior to a second time microsurgical testicular sperm extraction after a negative one. Methods: A total of 40 non-obstructive azoospermia men were recruited from a specialized IVF center from 2014 to 2016. Participants were divided equally into two groups: Group A was subjected to testosterone downregulation alone for 1 month and then combined with gonadotropin administration for 3 months prior to second time testicular sperm extraction; Group B (controls) underwent second time microsurgical testicular sperm extraction without prior hormonal therapy. Results: Mean baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels of the controls and the cases were 26.9 ± 11.8 and 25.4 ± 8.7, respectively. One month after testosterone downregulation, follicle-stimulating hormone level of the cases was normalized and became 2.4 ± 1.2. There was no statistically significant difference between baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels of the controls and cases (p = 0.946). Remarkably, two cases were positive after downregulation (10%) and no controls were positive at second testicular sperm extraction (0%). There was no statistically significant difference between sperm retrieval after the second microsurgical testicular sperm extraction in the controls and the cases (p = 0.072). Conclusion: Patients who underwent first time testicular sperm extraction with unfavorable outcome due to different techniques may benefit from testosterone downregulation combined with neoadjuvant gonadotropin administration as it had shown positive sperms retrieval in 2 out of the 20 cases, especially those with hypergonadotropic azoospermia.

scholarly journals Endocrine Tests and/or Testicular Volume are Not Predictive of Successful Sperm Retrieval by Conventional Multiple Testicular Sperm Extraction in Nonobstructive Azoospermia

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Minh Tam Le ◽  
Thi Thanh Tam Nguyen ◽  
Dac Nguyen Nguyen ◽  
Thi Nhu Quynh Tran ◽  
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Nonobstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Infertile Men ◽  
Sperm Aspiration ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the role of presurgical markers in the prediction of sperm retrieval by conventional Multiple Testicular Sperm Extraction in infertile Vietnamese men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Patients and Methods: Retrospective descriptive analysis of 136 infertile men with azoospermia, examined from August 2014 to July 2018. Patients underwent stepwise surgical sperm retrieval via percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular sperm aspiration, then conventional multiple testicular sperm extraction in up to three locations, and procedures stopped as soon as sperm were detected. Factors were analyzed to determine the prediction of the likelihood of successful sperm retrieval, in men with NOA. Results: The overall success rate of sperm retrieval in men with azoospermia was 49.3%, but it was only 18.4% in NOA group. The difference in testicular volume between men with successful sperm retrieval and unsuccessful sperm retrieval was not statistically significant in NOA group (5.68 ± 2.37 vs. 4.46 ± 2.83, p = 0.138). The differences in the endocrine tests between the two groups were also not significant in terms of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone (p ¿ 0.05). Multivariable analysis of predictive factors of sperm retrieval in NOA groups found no significant difference, except testicular density (p = 0.015). Conclusions:In infertile men with NOA, neither an endocrine test nor testicular volume should be used for predicting the results of surgical sperm retrieval by conventional multiple testicular sperm extraction.

scholarly journals Predicting The Ability To Successfully Retrieve Sperm In Infertile Men With Non-obstructive Azoospermia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh Tam Le ◽  
Thanh Tam Thi Nguyen ◽  
Quoc Huy Vu Nguyen ◽  
Janelle M. Jackman ◽  
Dinh Duong Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Volume ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Infertile Men ◽  
Sperm Aspiration

Abstract Objectives: to determine the ability of pre-surgical markers to predict the ability to retrieve sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing surgical sperm retrieval. Methods: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of 136 infertile patients with azoospermia, examined in the Hue Center for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (HUECREI), Hue University Hospital from August 2014 to July 2018. Patients underwent surgical sperm retrieval in a stepwise manner via percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) then testicular sperm extraction (TESE) until sperm were detected. Patient age, duration of infertility, body mass index (BMI), hormonal profile (FSH, LH & testosterone), and testicular volume were analyzed to determine the predictor of successful sperm retrieval. Analysis was done by univariate & multivariate generalized estimating equation modeling where the primary outcome was sperm retrieved at surgery. Results: In total of 136 infertile men with azoospermia, beside 45 cases with OA, surgical sperm retrieval was successful in 22/91 patients with NOA (24.2%). The group of men with successful sperm retrieval were more likely to live in urban area (P=0.012), higher proportion of normal testicular density (P<0.05), lower serum FSH and serum LH (P<0.001). By multiple logistic regression model, total testicular volume was found to be a only considerable predictor of sperm retrieval in NOA group (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.013-1.178, P=0.022). Conclusions: The measurement of total testicular volume can be helpful for predicting the successful result of surgical sperm retrieval in Vietnamese infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Key words: testicular ultrasound; endocrine profile; surgical sperm retrieval; non-obstructive; azoospermia.

scholarly journals Intraoperative assessment of tubules in predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with Sertoli cell-only syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 722-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yu ◽  
Qi Xi ◽  
Ruixue Wang ◽  
Hongguo Zhang ◽  
Leilei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sertoli Cell ◽  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Seminiferous Tubules ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Intraoperative Assessment ◽  
Retrieval Rate ◽  
Surgical Suture ◽  
Tubule Diameter

Objective This study aimed to assess the value of measuring the tubule diameter during microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in predicting outcomes in patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS). Methods Fifty-six consecutive patients with SCOS were included. Patients were classified into two groups on the basis of the diameter of seminiferous tubules measured against 5/0 surgical suture (≥100 µm or <100 µm). Results The sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was significantly lower than that in those with <100 µm (3.1% vs. 25.0%). The SRR from the contralateral testis in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was lower than that in those with <100 µm (0% vs. 14.3%). Men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm had a significantly larger testis and lower follicle-stimulating hormone levels than did men with <100 µm (8.1 ± 2.4 vs. 5.3±1.8 mL, 19.9 ± 9.7 vs. 25.9 ± 7.1 mIU/mL, respectively). Conclusions The diameter of tubules is a useful predictor for a successful SRR in men with SCOS. Intraoperative assessment of homogeneous large tubules allows some men to perform a limited (superficial) contralateral micro-TESE after no spermatozoa are initially identified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document