scholarly journals Evaluation of provider response to positive depression screenings and physician attitudes on integrating psychiatric pharmacist services in primary care settings

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany H. Denson ◽  
Rory E. Kim

Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify potential gaps in the management of depression and assess the perceptions of primary care providers (PCPs) toward integrating psychiatric pharmacists into primary care settings. Method: This was a retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 years of age seen in primary care clinics in Los Angeles County with a documented annual health screening (AHS) between January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. Primary outcomes were number and percentage of patients screened for depression with patient health questionnaire (PHQ) assessments, positive depression screenings, and interventions made for positive depression screenings. Secondary outcomes were PCPs' perceptions on management of depression, use of AHS, and roles for psychiatric pharmacists through evaluation of provider survey. Results: Of the patients who received an AHS (n = 6797), 63% received PHQ assessments. Of 145 individuals with a positive PHQ-2, 69% had a positive PHQ-9. Greater than 50% of individuals with a positive PHQ-9 had no preexisting depression diagnosis. Seventy-six percent of individuals with a positive PHQ-9 and 78% with reported suicide ideation had no documented intervention. The majority of providers reported there is a role for psychiatric pharmacists in primary care. Discussion: Gaps in the management of depression were identified. Although depression screenings were performed for the majority of individuals receiving an AHS, no documented interventions were made for most of those individuals who screened positive for depression. Primary care clinics could benefit from psychiatric pharmacist involvement in depression screening and follow-up processes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 635-643
Author(s):  
Joan S. Ash ◽  
Dian Chase ◽  
Sherry Baron ◽  
Margaret S. Filios ◽  
Richard N. Shiffman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although patients who work and have related health issues are usually first seen in primary care, providers in these settings do not routinely ask questions about work. Guidelines to help manage such patients are rarely used in primary care. Electronic health record (EHR) systems with worker health clinical decision support (CDS) tools have potential for assisting these practices. Objective This study aimed to identify the need for, and barriers and facilitators related to, implementation of CDS tools for the clinical management of working patients in a variety of primary care settings. Methods We used a qualitative design that included analysis of interview transcripts and observational field notes from 10 clinics in five organizations. Results We interviewed 83 providers, staff members, managers, informatics and information technology experts, and leaders and spent 35 hours observing. We identified eight themes in four categories related to CDS for worker health (operational issues, usefulness of proposed CDS, effort and time-related issues, and topic-specific issues). These categories were classified as facilitators or barriers to the use of the CDS tools. Facilitators related to operational issues include current technical feasibility and new work patterns associated with the coordinated care model. Facilitators concerning usefulness include users' need for awareness and evidence-based tools, appropriateness of the proposed CDS for their patients, and the benefits of population health data. Barriers that are effort-related include additional time this proposed CDS might take, and other pressing organizational priorities. Barriers that are topic-specific include sensitive issues related to health and work and the complexities of information about work. Conclusion We discovered several themes not previously described that can guide future CDS development: technical feasibility of the proposed CDS within commercial EHRs, the sensitive nature of some CDS content, and the need to assist the entire health care team in managing worker health.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitriana Murriya Ekawati ◽  
Sharon Licqurish ◽  
Jane Gunn ◽  
Shaun Brennecke ◽  
Phyllis Lau

Abstract Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a significant contributor to the high maternal mortality rate in Indonesia. At the moment, limited guidelines are available to assist primary care providers in managing HDP cases. A previous review of 16 international HDP guidelines has identified opportunities for improving HDP management in Indonesian primary care, but it has not determined the suitability of the recommendations in practice. This study aims to achieve consensus among the experts regarding the recommendations suitability and to develop HDP pathways in Indonesian primary care. Methods Maternal health experts, including GPs, midwives, nurses, medical specialists and health policy researchers from Indonesia and overseas were recruited for the study. They participated in a consensus development process that applied a mix of quantitative and qualitative questions in three Delphi survey rounds. At the first and second-round survey, the participants were asked to rate their agreement on whether each of 125 statements about HDP and HDP management is appropriate for use in Indonesian primary care settings. The third-round survey presented the drafts of HDP pathways and sought participants’ agreement and further suggestions. The participants’ agreement scores were calculated with a statement needing a minimum of 70% agreement to be included in the HDP pathways. The participants’ responses and suggestions to the free text questions were analysed thematically. Results A total of 52 participants were included, with 48, 45 and 37 of them completing the first, second and third round of the survey respectively. Consensus was reached for 115 of the 125 statements on HDP definition, screening, management and long-term follow-up. Agreement scores for the statements ranged from 70.8–100.0%, and potential implementation barriers of the pathways were identified. Drafts of HDP management pathways were also agreed upon and received suggestions from the participants. Conclusions Most evidence-based management recommendations achieved consensus and were included in the developed HDP management pathways, which can potentially be implemented in Indonesian settings. Further investigations are needed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the developed HDP pathways in primary care practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S846-S846
Author(s):  
Ben A Blomberg ◽  
Catherine Quintana ◽  
Jingwen Hua ◽  
Leslie Hargis-Fuller ◽  
Jeff Laux ◽  
...  

Abstract There is a need for increased clinician training on advance care planning (ACP). Common barriers to ACP include perceived lack of confidence, skills, and knowledge necessary to engage in these discussions. Furthermore, many clinicians feel inadequately trained in prognostication. There is evidence that multimodality curricula are effective in teaching ACP, and may be simultaneously targeted to trainees and practicing clinicians with success. We developed a 3-hour workshop incorporating lecture, patient-oriented decision aids, prognostication tools, small group discussion, and case-based role-play to communicate a values-based approach to ACP. Cases included discussion of care goals a patient with severe COPD and one with mild cognitive impairment. The workshop was delivered to 4th year medical students, then adapted in two primary care clinics. In the clinics, we added an interprofessional case applying ACP to management of dental pain in advanced dementia. We evaluated the workshops using pre-post surveys. 34 medical students and 14 primary care providers participated. Self-reported knowledge and comfort with ACP significantly improved; attitudes toward ACP were strongly positive both before and after. The workshop was well received. On a seven-point Likert scale, (1=Unacceptable, 7=Outstanding), the median overall rating was 6 (“Excellent”). In conclusion, we developed an ACP workshop applicable to both students and primary clinicians. We saw improvements in self-reported knowledge and comfort with ACP, though long-term effects were not studied. Participants found the role-play especially valuable. Most modifications for primary care clinics focused on duration rather than content. Future directions include expanding the interprofessional workshop content.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A McCord ◽  
Mary G Lynch ◽  
April Y Maa

In 2015, a tele-ophthalmology program was undertaken at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center to provide screening eye care for veterans in their primary care clinics. Though this program was developed as a screening tool, the availability of these services in primary care clinics has enabled triage of certain acute eye complaints. These case reports describe two patients who were diagnosed with retinal detachments through this program, although their primary care providers had triaged them as requiring non-urgent referrals to the eye clinic. Although many patients are seen for acute ocular complaints in primary care clinics and emergency departments, providers in such settings may lack the ability to adequately examine eyes and thus triage ocular complaints. These cases demonstrate the ability of tele-ophthalmology to assist in diagnosing urgent ocular conditions in primary care clinics. Though tele-ophthalmology has been accepted in some parts of the world, in the United States of America it remains widely underutilized. These cases highlight the ability of tele-ophthalmology to close the gap in acute eye care coverage that exists in the USA, most prominently in rural regions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-344
Author(s):  
Erik D. Storholm ◽  
Allison J. Ober ◽  
Matthew L. Mizel ◽  
Luke Matthews ◽  
Matthew Sargent ◽  
...  

Increasing access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in primary care settings for patients who may be at risk for HIV could help to increase PrEP uptake, which has remained low among certain key risk populations. The current study conducted interviews with primary care providers identified from national claims data as having either high or low likelihood of serving PrEP-eligible patients based on their prescribing practices for other sexually transmitted infections. The study yielded important information about primary care providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about PrEP, as well as the barriers and facilitators to prescribing PrEP. Key recommendations for a provider-focused intervention to increase PrEP prescribing among primary care providers, including increasing patient education to increase demand from providers, enhancing provider education, leveraging technology, and instituting standardized sexual health checks, are provided with the goal of informing network-based interventions.


10.2196/30479 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e30479
Author(s):  
Rhiannon Martel ◽  
Matthew Shepherd ◽  
Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Background Adolescents often present at primary care clinics with nonspecific physical symptoms when, in fact, they have at least 1 mental health or risk behavior (psychosocial) issue with which they would like help but do not disclose to their care provider. Despite global recommendations, over 50% of youths are not screened for mental health and risk behavior issues in primary care. Objective This review aimed to examine the implementation, acceptability, feasibility, benefits, and barriers of e-screening tools for mental health and risk behaviors among youth in primary care settings. Methods Electronic databases—MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews—were searched for studies on the routine screening of youth in primary care settings. Screening tools needed to be electronic and screen for at least 1 mental health or risk behavior issue. A total of 11 studies that were reported in 12 articles, of which all were from high-income countries, were reviewed. Results e-Screening was largely proven to be feasible and acceptable to youth and their primary care providers. Preconsultation e-screening facilitated discussions about sensitive issues and increased disclosure by youth. However, barriers such as the lack of time, training, and discomfort in raising sensitive issues with youth continued to be reported. Conclusions To implement e-screening, clinicians need to change their behaviors, and e-screening processes must become normalized into their workflows. Co-designing and tailoring screening implementation frameworks to meet the needs of specific contexts may be required to ensure that clinicians overcome initial resistances and perceived barriers and adopt the required processes in their work.


Author(s):  
Srijana Shrestha

Despite high rates of mental illnesses, older adults face multiple barriers in accessing mental health care. Primary care clinics, and home- and community-based senior-serving agencies are settings where older adults routinely receive medical care and social services. Therefore, integration of mental health care with existing service delivery systems can improve access to mental health services and reduce the unmet mental health needs of seniors. Evidence suggests that with innovative components mental health provided in collaboration with primary care providers with or without co-location within primary care clinics can improve depression and anxiety. Home-based models for depression care are also effective, but more research is needed in examining home-based approaches in late-life anxiety treatment. It is noteworthy that integrative models are particularly helpful in expanding the reach in underserved communities: elders from minority and low-income backgrounds and homebound seniors.


Author(s):  
Hildi J. Hagedorn ◽  
Jennifer P. Wisdom ◽  
Heather Gerould ◽  
Erika Pinsker ◽  
Randall Brown ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite the high prevalence of alcohol use disorders (AUDs), in 2016, only 7.8% of individuals meeting diagnostic criteria received any type of AUD treatment. Developing options for treatment within primary care settings is imperative to increase treatment access. As part of a trial to implement AUD pharmacotherapy in primary care settings, this qualitative study analyzed pre-implementation provider interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify implementation barriers. Methods Three large Veterans Health Administration facilities participated in the implementation intervention. Local providers were trained to serve as implementation/clinical champions and received external facilitation from the project team. Primary care providers received a dashboard of patients with AUD for case identification, educational materials, and access to consultation from clinical champions. Veterans with AUD diagnoses received educational information in the mail. Prior to the start of implementation activities, 24 primary care providers (5–10 per site) participated in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using common coding techniques for qualitative data using the CFIR codebook Innovation/Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, and Characteristics of Individuals domains. Number and type of barriers identified were compared to quantitative changes in AUD pharmacotherapy prescribing rates. Results Four major barriers emerged across all three sites: complexity of providing AUD pharmacotherapy in primary care, the limited compatibility of AUD treatment with existing primary care processes, providers’ limited knowledge and negative beliefs about AUD pharmacotherapy and providers’ negative attitudes toward patients with AUD. Site specific barriers included lack of relative advantage of providing AUD pharmacotherapy in primary care over current practice, complaints about the design quality and packaging of implementation intervention materials, limited priority of addressing AUD in primary care and limited available resources to implement AUD pharmacotherapy in primary care. Conclusions CFIR constructs were useful for identifying pre-implementation barriers that informed refinements to the implementation intervention. The number and type of pre-implementation barriers identified did not demonstrate a clear relationship to the degree to which sites were able to improve AUD pharmacotherapy prescribing rate. Site-level implementation process factors such as leadership support and provider turn-over likely also interacted with pre-implementation barriers to drive implementation outcomes.


Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (20 Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S14.2-S14
Author(s):  
Nina Yakovlevna Riggins ◽  
Henna Sawhney ◽  
Annika Ehrlich ◽  
Mira Parekh ◽  
Morris Levin

ObjectiveTo evaluate if inpatient infusion treatments for patients with chronic migraine (CM) and history of head trauma and endocrine abnormalities can lead to headache improvement.BackgroundMany patients with CM and history of head trauma have endocrine co-morbidities that can interfere with successful management of headache. In this study, we evaluated if inpatient infusion treatments improved headache outcomes for this patient population.Design/MethodsRetrospective chart review of patients admitted and treated with 4–5 days of intravenous (IV) Dihydroergotamine (DHE), Chlorpromazine, or Valproate for headache. All cases were presented at the Headache Center Case Conference before admission, and plans for addressing co-morbidities were discussed with appropriate specialists and primary care providers. Co-morbidities addressed included diabetes mellitus, pituitary and thyroid dysfunction and endometriosis. During admission, vital signs and appropriate lab work such as serum glucose, thyroid, liver and renal function were monitored. Lifestyle recommendations provided during admission and appropriate follow ups after discharge were arranged with Headache Clinic, primary care, and specialists, when applicable.Results53 patients with CM were included in the analysis. 12 (22.6%) of the 53 patients had both reported history of head trauma and endocrine comorbidity. Of these 12 patients, 8 (66.7%) had improvement in headache up to 6 weeks after admission. Of the 8 that improved, 6 (75%) received DHE and 2 (25%) received Chlorpromazine.ConclusionsInpatient infusion treatments for patients who have CM with history of head trauma and endocrine abnormalities can lead to headache improvement, potentially due to IV infusion therapy along with holistic approaches which include addressing co-morbidities and education on lifestyle modifications. Future studies are needed to evaluate if specific endocrine system dysfunction can predict outcomes from repetitive infusion therapy for persistent headache in patients with CM and a reported history of head trauma.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-643
Author(s):  
Polly Hitchcock Noël ◽  
Chen-Pin Wang ◽  
Erin P. Finley ◽  
Sara E. Espinoza ◽  
Michael L. Parchman ◽  
...  

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) suggests that linkages between primary care practices and community-based resources can improve health in lower income and minority patients, but examples of these are rare. We conducted a prospective, mixed-methods observational study to identify indicators of primary care–community linkage associated with the frequency of visits to community-based senior centers and improvements in diabetes-related outcomes among 149 new senior center members (72% Hispanic). We used semistructured interviews at baseline and 9-month follow-up, obtaining visit frequency from member software and clinical assessments including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from colocated primary care clinics. Members’ discussion of their activities with their primary care providers (PCPs) was associated with increased visits to the senior centers, as well as diabetes-related improvements. Direct feedback from the senior centers to their PCPs was desired by the majority of members and may help to reinforce use of community resources for self-management support.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document