scholarly journals Sexual Dimorphism of Bizygomatic distance & Maxillary sinus using CT Scan

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massarat Jehan ◽  
◽  
Vipendra Bhadkaria ◽  
Akhilesh Trivedi ◽  
S.K. Sharma
2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Thomas ◽  
Scott M. Graham ◽  
Keith D. Carter ◽  
Jeffrey A. Nerad

Background Enophthalmos in a patient with an opacified hypoplastic maxillary sinus, without sinus symptomatology, describes the silent sinus syndrome. A current trend is to perform endoscopic maxillary antrostomy and orbital floor reconstruction as a single-staged operation. A two-staged approach is performed at our institution to avoid placement of an orbital floor implant in the midst of potential infection and allow for the possibility that enophthalmos and global ptosis may resolve with endoscopic antrostomy alone, obviating the need for orbital floor reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review identified four patients with silent sinus syndrome evaluated between June 1999 and August 2001. Patients presented to our ophthalmology department with ocular asymmetry, and computerized tomography (CT) scanning confirmed the diagnosis in each case. Results There were three men and one woman, with ages ranging from 27 to 40 years. All patients underwent endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. Preoperative enophthalmos determined by Hertel's measurements ranged from 3 to 4 mm. After endoscopic maxillary antrostomy, the range of reduction in enophthalmos was 1–2 mm. Case 2 had a preoperative CT scan and a CT scan 9 months after left endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. Volumetric analysis of the left maxillary sinus revealed a preoperative volume of 16.85 ± 0.06 cm3 and a postoperative volume of 19.56 ± 0.07 cm3. This represented a 16% increase in maxillary sinus volume postoperatively. Orbital floor augmentation was avoided in two patients because of satisfactory improvement in enophthalmos. In the other two patients, orbital reconstruction was performed as a second-stage procedure. There were no complications. Conclusion Orbital floor augmentation can be offered as a second-stage procedure for patients with silent sinus syndrome. Some patients’ enophthalmos may improve with endoscopic antrostomy alone.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Rupesh Gautam ◽  
Deepak Adhikari ◽  
Matrika Dhital ◽  
Sudip Thakur ◽  
Bhawana Adhikari

Introduction: The variation in the course of infraorbital canal and protrusion of the infraorbital nerve through it to the maxillary sinus may lead to its accidental injury during reconstructive or endoscopic sinus surgery. Preoperative identification of this variant will prevent unintended injuries. Methods: A retrospective study of 307 patients who underwent CT scan study of the paranasal sinuses at Chitwan Medical College, Nepal was conducted. The protrusion of infraorbital nerve to the maxillary sinus was identified and the length of the bony septum along with the infraorbital nerve was measured. It was further classified as Class I to III according to the length of the septum.Results: The prevalence of protrusion of inferior orbital nerve in our study was 11.40 % and bilateral protrusion was 5.8 %.  The median length of the protruding component along with the septum was 4.9 mm. Conclusion: Preoperative identification of the normal protrusion of infraorbital nerve to the maxillary sinus will prevent accidental injuries during sinus surgery. CT scan of the paranasal sinus would be the modality of choice for identification of this variant. 


2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Kasabah ◽  
Radovan Slezák ◽  
Antonín Šimůnek ◽  
Jiří Krug ◽  
Miguel Cevallos Lecaro

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of panoramic radiography in identification of maxillary sinus septa. Out of 68 sinuses were radiographically examined using both panoramic and computerized tomographic radiographs (CT scan). Using CT scan, 24 (35.9 %) out of 68 cases maxillae showed at least one septum, 22 sinuses (32.3 %) showed one septum, whereas two sinuses (2.9 %) exhibited two septa. Panoramic radiograph led to a false diagnosis regarding the presence or absence of sinus septa in 18 of 68 sinuses (26.5 %). On the other hand, they gave negative diagnosis of sinus septa in 12 of 24 septa (50 %). There was fully agreement between the two methods (positive septa) only in 12 of 24 septa (50 %). We cannot depend on panoramic radiograph for the detection of sinus septa because it can lead to false or negative results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 200409
Author(s):  
C.B.R.B. Soares ◽  
M. Miranda-Viana ◽  
A.A. Pontual ◽  
F.M.M. Ramos-Perez ◽  
D.E.C. Perez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-91
Author(s):  
Pankaj Kumar Singh ◽  
Ram Chandra Paudel ◽  
Ritesh G Menezes ◽  
Kishor Khanal

Background: In forensic science, skeletal examination is often done with primary focus on identification. Complete identification is a rare event in this type of examination. However, anthropological identification can be done in skeletal examination. Skull is the second best for determination of sex next to pelvis. Maxillary sinuses are paranasal sinuses, and a feature for sexual dimorphism which remains intact in partially charred. The study of maxillary sinus is best done on Computed Tomography.Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate bilateral maxillary sinus for sexual dimorphism using Computed Tomography.Methodology: A total of 104 CT head cases were studied of which 52 were male and 52 female. The anterior posterior length, transverse width and height of bilateral maxillary sinus were measured in male and female through their DICOM images using inbuilt electronic calliper. Descriptive analysis for mean, paired t test to compare right and left maxillary sinus in both male and female, and student t test for compare male and female were used for analysing the value measured and calculated.Results: Male maxillary sinus (Right 12.76±4.62 & Left 12.39±3.81) was found be to larger than that of female (Right 12.16±4.78 & Left 11.80±4.49). Right and left maxillary sinus of both the sexes showed no significant difference when paired t test was used. Using independent t-test showed no sexual dimorphism between the two sexes.Conclusion: Maxillary sinus is not good tool for sex determination in Nepalese population. However further studies could be done on larger population sample, as smaller sample size could be the limitation of this study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Kishan Dhanak ◽  
Sundeep Ingale ◽  
SR Kochar ◽  
Akhilesh Pathak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document