scholarly journals Impact of Adverse Reactions on Adherence To Treatment For Mdr –Tb Under Pmdt in A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 82-85
Author(s):  
Dr.Keerthivasan Sivanmani
Author(s):  
A. Noorjahan ◽  
B. Bhargavi ◽  
K. Mallikarjuna ◽  
B. Mohammad Ishaq ◽  
L. Siva Sankar Reddy ◽  
...  

Tuberculosis (TB) is a communicable systemic infectious disease with high morbidity and mortality associated with it. Resistance to medications used to treat tuberculosis has been on the rise in recent years. (multidrug-resistant tuberculosis)  (MDR-TB)  is a significant challenge to (TB) control around the world. An observational research was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital to determine the interim pharmacological and microbial results of Rifampicin resistance TB patients. Data from Santhiram Medical College and General Hospital, Nandyal, Kurnool Dist. Andhra Pradesh were obtained from Aug 2020 to Feb 2021, after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The effects of the regimen are determined in terms of cure, finished treatment, treatment failure, number of patients moved to MDR-TB, number of patients who died in long-term MDR-TB regimen patients. Microsoft Excel 2007 was used to analyse the data. There were 82 male and 23 female out of 105 patients included in the study. Of these 75 patients were from rural areas and 40 from urban areas Using the Chi-square test and X2=12.1026, p=0.0005, which was important, the correlation between geographical spread and treatment result was determined. Out of 115 patients, 99 (86.09 percent) were cured of their disease, 06 (5.22 percent) died, 10 (8.69 percent) developed MDR-TB, and 2 (1.74 percent) were deemed medication errors. Males between the ages of 51 and 70 are more vulnerable to TB than females, according to our results. Compared to females of the same age, male patients over 40 years of age are more vulnerable to MDRTB. this was not part of the research objectives, emphasis should not be placed on this as either conclusion or recommendation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
JigarD Kapadia ◽  
KunalJ Ghataliya ◽  
MiraK Desai ◽  
KM Mehariya ◽  
GH Rathod ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sheetal M. Savaliya ◽  
Anil P. Singh ◽  
Kiran G. Piparva

Background: Donor hemovigilance is an important aspect of the hemovigilance system and contributes to decrease the blood donor’s complications and improving blood donor safety and functioning of blood bank. Reporting of adverse reactions associated with blood donations has been covered under National blood donor vigilance programme. This study was carried out to estimate the adverse events in blood donors and to promote their safety.Methods: The study was conducted over a period of 6 months, from 1st January 2017 to 30th June 2017 after getting approval from institutional ethics committee at tertiary care teaching hospital. Prior informed consent was obtained and donor confidentiality was ensured. The donors were observed for adverse event during or after donation. For delayed reactions, donors were requested to contact the researcher or designated departmental staff. Data was collected in case record form. Data entry was done in excel 2013 and appropriate Statistical test (chi square) was applied.Results: During study period total 7970 donors were registered, out of which 53.27% donors have donated their blood in blood camps and 46.72% have in blood bank. Incidence of donor reactions was 1.54%. Incidence of adverse reaction was higher at blood camps (58.53%). Authors found highest number of cases of mild vaso vagal type reactions (53%). Other types of reactions observed were painful arm, hematoma, delayed bleeding, tingling and moderate type of vaso vagal reaction.Conclusions: Authors did not find any major serious events like convulsion, thrombophlebitis or arterial puncture during study period. It considers that safety of donors was maintained.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 358-360
Author(s):  
Manikanta Reddy. V Manikanta Reddy. V ◽  
◽  
Senthil Kumar. S Senthil Kumar. S ◽  
Sanjeeva Reddy. N Sanjeeva Reddy. N

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document