Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Pharmacokinetic and Safety Assessments Based on Hepatic Impairment Status and Geographic Region

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Phase 1b GO30140 and phase 3 IMbrave150 studies evaluated first-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety by hepatic impairment status and geographic region. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients received atezolizumab 1,200 mg + bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Drug concentrations were evaluated by descriptive statistics and population PK. PK and adverse event frequencies were evaluated by hepatic impairment status and region. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 323 IMbrave150 patients and 162 GO30140 patients were PK evaluable. Compared with IMbrave150 patients who had normal hepatic function per the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) criteria (<i>n</i> = 123), patients with mild impairment (<i>n</i> = 171) had a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 0.92 for cycle 1 atezolizumab area under the concentration-time curve (AUC); patients with moderate impairment (<i>n</i> = 27) had a GMR of 0.88. Patients in Asia ([<i>n</i> = 162] vs. outside [<i>n</i> = 161]) had a GMR of 1.25 for cycle 1 atezolizumab AUC. Compared with GO30140 patients who had normal hepatic function (NCI-ODWG [<i>n</i> = 61]), patients with mild impairment (<i>n</i> = 92) had a GMR of 0.97 for cycle 1 peak bevacizumab concentrations; those with moderate impairment (<i>n</i> = 9) had a GMR of 0.94. Patients in Asia (<i>n</i> = 111) versus outside Asia (<i>n</i> = 51) had a GMR of 0.94 for cycle 1 peak bevacizumab concentration. PK results were generally comparable when evaluated based on additional hepatic functional definitions (Child-Pugh or albumin/bilirubin criteria) or study enrollment in Japan. No associations between atezolizumab PK and HCC etiology were seen. Adverse event frequencies were similar across evaluated groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IMbrave150 and GO30140 patients with unresectable HCC had varying baseline hepatic impairment and high enrollment from Asia. PK data demonstrated considerable exposure overlap across groups. Treatment was tolerable across groups. No need for dose adjustment based on mild or moderate hepatic impairment or region is recommended based on this analysis.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic impairment

Purpose The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib is approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; however, limited data are available on its use in patients with hepatic dysfunction. This study investigated whether hepatic impairment affects the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods Patients with normal hepatic function or moderate hepatic impairment according to the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) criteria were enrolled and received a single oral dose of rucaparib 600 mg. Concentrations of rucaparib and its metabolite M324 in plasma and urine were measured. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between hepatic function groups, and safety and tolerability were assessed. Results Sixteen patients were enrolled (n = 8 per group). Rucaparib maximum concentration (Cmax) was similar, while the area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–inf) was mildly higher in the moderate hepatic impairment group than in the normal control group (geometric mean ratio, 1.446 [90% CI 0.668–3.131]); similar trends were observed for M324. Eight (50%) patients experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 2 had normal hepatic function and 6 had moderate hepatic impairment. Conclusion Patients with moderate hepatic impairment showed mildly increased AUC0–inf for rucaparib compared to patients with normal hepatic function. Although more patients with moderate hepatic impairment experienced TEAEs, only 2 TEAEs were considered treatment related. These results suggest no starting dose adjustment is necessary for patients with moderate hepatic impairment; however, close safety monitoring is warranted.

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Analysis To Predict the Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Isavuconazole in Patients with or without Hepatic Impairment

ABSTRACT Isavuconazole (ISA) is an azole antifungal used in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment have lower clearance (CL) than the healthy population. Currently, there are no data on ISA in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C). The purposes of this study were to build a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous ISA and to predict changes in ISA disposition in different patient populations and in patients with hepatic impairment so as to guide personalized dosing. By incorporating the systemic and drug-specific parameters of ISA, the model was initially developed in a healthy population and was validated with 10 independent PK profiles obtained from healthy subjects and from patients with normal liver function. The results showed satisfactory predictive capacity; most of the relative predictive errors were within ±30% for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration of the drug in serum (Cmax). The observed concentration-time profiles of ISA in plasma were well described by the model-predicted profiles. The model adequately predicted the reduced CL of ISA in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Furthermore, the model predicted a decrease in CL of about 60% in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Therefore, we recommend reducing the dose by 50% in patients with severe hepatic impairment. The model also predicted differences in the PK of ISA between Caucasian and Asian populations, with a Chinese/Caucasian CL ratio of 0.67. The PBPK model of ISA that was developed provides a reasonable approach for optimizing the dosage regimen in different ethnic populations and in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of BMS-986177/JNJ-70033093 in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy participants

Background According to the scientific evidence accumulated to date (ie, genetic, epidemiological, preclinical, clinical), the modulation of Factor XI (FXI) function may provide a novel mechanism for systemic anticoagulation without increasing the risk of clinically significant bleeding in a variety of conditions predisposing patients to a high risk of thrombotic or bleeding events. BMS-986177/JNJ-70033093 (BMS-177/JNJ-3093) is a small molecule that inhibits the active form of FXI (FXIa) with high affinity and selectivity. Depending on the indication, BMS-177/JNJ-3093 may provide benefit to patients as add-on or potentially replacement therapy to the current standard of care antithrombotic agents. Patients with hepatic impairment may have an increased risk of bleeding when using existing antithrombotic agents and therefore may benefit from drugs with an improved safety profile. Purpose To assess the effect of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of BMS-177/JNJ-3093. Methods This was a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, single-dose study. A single 60-mg oral dose of BMS-177/JNJ-3093 was administered to 9 participants with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A), 8 participants with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B), and 9 healthy participants with normal hepatic function. Healthy participants were matched to participants with hepatic impairment in each Child-Pugh class with regard to body weight. To assess the effects of hepatic impairment on BMS-177/JNJ-3093 PK, an analysis of variance was performed on the natural log-transformed Cmax, AUC(INF), and AUC(0-T) with hepatic function group as a fixed effect. Results BMS-177/JNJ-3093 was well tolerated when administered as an oral dose of 60 mg in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and healthy participants with normal hepatic function. There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), severe AEs, bleeding AEs, or discontinuations due to an AE reported during the study. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% CI) comparing mild hepatic impairment to normal hepatic function were 1.180 (0.735, 1.895) and 1.168 (0.725, 1.882) for total BMS-177/JNJ-3093 maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(INF)), respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) comparing moderate hepatic impairment to normal hepatic function were 1.140 (0.699, 1.857) and 0.996 (0.609, 1.628) for total BMS-177/JNJ-3093 Cmax and AUC(INF), respectively. Overall, levels of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) increased in an exposure-related manner following single oral doses of 60 mg BMS-177/JNJ-3093 in all groups. Conclusion BMS-177/JNJ-3093 was well tolerated in the normal healthy participants and those with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. The observed changes indicate that a dose adjustment in these populations may not be necessary. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): This work was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Janssen Research & Development, LLC

1009. Dolutegravir and Doravirine in Combination: When Standard Antiretroviral Regimens are Unacceptable

Background A drug-drug interaction study between dolutegravir and doravirine in healthy volunteers found no evidence of untoward interaction. Whilst we hypothesize that the combination would be safe and effective, there is no supportive clinical data. We aimed to assess the rationale for use of dolutegravir and doravirine in combination and clinical outcomes among persons with HIV infection (PWH) receiving care at the Washington DC VAMC. Methods A quality improvement initiative utilized the clinical case registry to identify all PWH receiving both dolutegravir and doravirine. We conducted chart review to examine (a) the reasons for switch from other ART to dolutegravir and doravirine, and comorbidities, HIV resistance mutations or drug interactions precluding the use of standard ART, (b) adverse events or side effects and (c) achievement of virologic suppression. Results A case registry search revealed 21 individuals receiving combination dolutegravir doravirine from 2018–2020 (Table 1 and Figure 1). Side effects were not noted except one patient developed mild diarrhea that improved with continuation of therapy. Four patients were hospitalized during the follow-up period for reasons unrelated to the medications. One patient who was admitted to the ICU with shock and multi-organ failure was switched on admission but died four days later and therefore was not included in the analysis of viral outcome (Table 2). One patient had cardiac arrest following missed dialysis, hyperkalemia and rectal hemorrhage from metastatic rectal cancer. Table 1: Patient Demographics. Figure 1: Reasons for Switching to Dolutegravir with Doravirine. Table 2: Virologic Control Before and After Switching to Dolutegravir with Doravirine. Conclusion In an era of abundant ART options, we identified a subset of older PWH whose treatment options are defined by extensive comorbidities, viral resistance, and medication interactions or toxicities. Doravirine is attractive for this population as it can be used in renal impairment, moderate hepatic impairment, is unaffected by timing of meals, and (unlike rilpivirine) has no interaction with proton pump inhibitors. Dolutegravir is included in NRTI-sparing regimens that HHS guidelines suggest should be considered in older PWH, especially with CKD. We found that dolutegravir with doravirine is well tolerated, and achieves virologic suppression in the majority of PWH, indicating this combination is useful when other ART options cannot be used. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

An Open-Label Study of the Impact of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single Oral and Intravenous Doses of Omadacycline

ABSTRACT Omadacycline is a once-daily oral or intravenous (i.v.) aminomethylcycline antibiotic approved in the United States for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) in adults. Omadacycline pharmacokinetics were characterized in 18 patients with hepatic impairment and 12 matched healthy subjects. Patients with hepatic impairment received i.v. omadacycline at 100 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 50 mg (moderate and severe hepatic impairment) and oral omadacycline at 300 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 150 mg (moderate hepatic impairment); oral omadacycline was not evaluated in those with severe hepatic impairment. Safety monitoring included the collection of adverse events (AEs), performance of laboratory tests, determination of vital signs, and performance of electrocardiograms. Omadacycline exposures were similar in patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects following i.v. or oral administration, with the geometric mean ratios for the area under the concentration-time curve and the maximum drug concentration ranging from 0.79 to 1.42. Omadacycline was safe and well tolerated. Overall, 13/30 (43.3%) participants experienced an AE; those occurring in more than 1 participant included headache (13.3%), nausea (6.7%), infusion-site pain (6.7%), contusion (6.7%), and dizziness (6.7%), with no differences based on the degree of hepatic impairment or the route of administration. Asymptomatic increases in heart rate were observed; none was considered an AE. These findings suggest that no omadacycline dose adjustment is warranted in patients with hepatic impairment.