acoustic dissipation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

21
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Lucklum ◽  
Nikolay Mukhin ◽  
Bahram Djafari Rouhani ◽  
Yan Pennec

Resonant mechanical sensors are often considered as mass balance, which responds to an analyte adsorbed on or absorbed in a thin sensitive (and selective) layer deposited on the surface of the resonant device. In a more general sense, the sensor measures properties at the interface of the mechanical resonator to the medium under inspection. A phononic crystal (PnC) sensor employs mechanical resonance as well; however, the working principle is fundamentally different. The liquid medium under inspection becomes an integral part of the PnC sensor. The liquid-filled compartment acts as a mechanical resonator. Therefore, the sensor probes the entire liquid volume within this compartment. In both sensor concepts, the primary sensor value is a resonant frequency. To become an attractive new sensing concept, specifically as a bio and chemical sensor, the PnC sensor must reach an extraordinary sensitivity. We pay attention to the liquid viscosity, which is an important factor limiting sensitivity. The main part of our analysis has been performed on 1D PnC sensors, since they underlie the same material-related acoustic dissipation mechanisms as 2D and 3D PnC sensors. We show that an optimal relation of frequency shift to bandwidth and amplitude of resonance is the key to an enhanced sensitivity of the sensor-to-liquid analyte properties. We finally address additional challenges of 2D and 3D PnC sensor design concept. We conclude that the sensor should seek for a frequency resolution close to 10−6 the probing frequency, or a resolution with speed of sound approaching 1 mm s−1, taking water-based analytes as an example.


Author(s):  
R. Gaudron ◽  
M. Gatti ◽  
C. Mirat ◽  
T. Schuller

The frequency response of a confined premixed swirled flame is explored experimentally through the use of describing functions that depend on both the forcing frequency and the forcing level. In these experiments, the flame is forced by a loudspeaker connected to the bottom of the burner in the fresh gas region or by a set of loudspeakers connected to the combustion chamber exhaust tube in the burnt gas region. The experimental setup is equipped with a hot-wire (HW) probe and a microphone, both of which located in front of each other below the swirler. The forcing level is varied between |v′0|/v¯0=0.10 and 0.72 RMS, where v¯0 and v′0 are, respectively, the mean and the fluctuating velocity at the HW probe. An additional microphone is placed on a water-cooled waveguide connected to the combustion chamber backplate. A photomultiplier equipped with an OH* filter is used to measure the heat release rate fluctuations. The describing functions between the photomultiplier signal and the different pressure and velocity reference signals are then analyzed in the case of upstream and downstream forcing. The describing function measured for a given reference signal is shown to vary depending on the type of forcing. The impedance of the injector at the HW location is also determined for both upstream and downstream forcing. For all describing functions investigated, it is found that their phase lags do not depend on the forcing level, whereas their gains strongly depend on |v′0|/v¯0 for certain frequency ranges. It is furthermore shown that the flame describing function (FDF) measured with respect to the HW signal can be retrieved from the specific impedance at the HW location and the describing function determined with respect to the signal of the microphone located in front of the HW. This relationship is not valid when the signal from the microphone located at the combustion chamber backplate is considered. It is then shown that a one-dimensional (1D) acoustic model allows to reproduce the describing function computed with respect to the microphone signal inside the injector from the microphone signal located at the combustion chamber backplate in the case of downstream forcing. This relation does not hold for upstream forcing because of the acoustic dissipation across the swirler which is much larger compared to downstream forcing for a given forcing level set at the HW location. This study sheds light on the differences between upstream and downstream acoustic forcing when measuring describing functions. It is also shown that the upstream and downstream forcing techniques are equivalent only if the reference signal used to determine the FDF is the acoustic velocity in the fresh gases just before the flame.


Author(s):  
Daesik Kim ◽  
Seungchai Jung ◽  
Heeho Park

The side-wall cooling liner in a gas turbine combustor serves main purposes—heat transfer and emission control. Additionally, it functions as a passive damper to attenuate thermoacoustic instabilities. The perforations in the liner mainly convert acoustic energy into kinetic energy through vortex shedding at the orifice rims. In the previous decades, several analytical and semi-empirical models have been proposed to predict the acoustic damping of the perforated liner. In the current study, a few of the models are considered to embody the transfer matrix method (TMM) for analyzing the acoustic dissipation in a concentric tube resonator with a perforated element and validated against experimental data in the literature. All models are shown to quantitatively appropriately predict the acoustic behavior under high bias flow velocity conditions. Then, the models are applied to maximize the damping performance in a realistic gas turbine combustor, which is under development. It is found that the ratio of the bias flow Mach number to the porosity can be used as a design guideline in choosing the optimal combination of the number and diameter of perforations in terms of acoustic damping.


Author(s):  
R. Gaudron ◽  
M. Gatti ◽  
C. Mirat ◽  
T. Schuller

The frequency response of a confined premixed swirled flame is explored experimentally through the use of describing functions that depend on both the forcing frequency and forcing level. In these experiments, the flame is forced by a loudspeaker connected to the bottom of the burner in the fresh gas region or by a set of loudspeakers connected to the combustion chamber exhaust tube in the burnt gas region. The experimental setup is equipped with a hot-wire probe and a microphone, both of which located in front of each other below the swirler. The forcing level is varied between |v′0|/v̄0 = 0.10 and 0.72 RMS where v̄0 and v′0 are respectively the mean and fluctuating velocity at the hot-wire probe. An additional microphone is placed on a water-cooled waveguide connected to the combustion chamber backplate. A photomultiplier equipped with an OH* filter is used to measure the heat release rate fluctuations. The describing functions between the photomultiplier signal and the different pressure and velocity reference signals are then analyzed in the case of upstream and downstream forcing. The describing function measured for a given reference signal is shown to vary depending on the type of forcing. The impedance of the injector at the hot-wire location is also measured using the hot-wire and microphone signals for both upstream and downstream forcing. For all describing functions investigated, it is found that their phase lags do not depend on the forcing level whereas their gains strongly depend on |v′0|/v̄0 for certain frequency ranges. It is furthermore shown that the Flame Describing Function measured with respect to the hot-wire signal can be retrieved from the specific impedance at the hot-wire location and the describing function determined with respect to the signal of the microphone located in front of the hot-wire. This relationship is not valid when the signal from the microphone located at the combustion chamber backplate is considered. It is then shown that a ID acoustic model allows to reproduce the describing function computed with respect to the microphone signal inside the injector from the microphone signal located at the combustion chamber backplate in the case of downstream forcing. This relation does not hold for upstream forcing because of the acoustic dissipation across the swirler which is much larger compared to downstream forcing for a given forcing level set at the hot-wire location. This study sheds light on the differences between upstream and downstream acoustic forcing when measuring describing functions. It is also shown that the upstream and downstream forcing techniques are equivalent only if the reference signal used to determine the flame describing function is the acoustic velocity in the fresh gases just before the flame.


2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 2840-2848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henri Boutin ◽  
Sandie Le Conte ◽  
Stéphane Vaiedelich ◽  
Benoit Fabre ◽  
Jean-Loïc Le Carrou

2017 ◽  
Vol 390 ◽  
pp. 39-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Webster ◽  
Justin Hardi ◽  
Michael Oschwald
Keyword(s):  

CrystEngComm ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 370-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiying Zhang ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Michael A. Carpenter ◽  
Christopher J. Howard ◽  
Anthony K. Cheetham

Elastic properties and acoustic dissipation associated with the disorder–order ferroelectric transition in a single crystal metal–organic framework (MOF), [NH4][Zn(HCOO)3], have been investigated using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) in the temperature range between 10 K and 300 K.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document