strength anisotropy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

208
(FIVE YEARS 41)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 251
Author(s):  
Liqin Ding ◽  
Zhiqiao Wang ◽  
Jianguo Lv ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Baolin Liu

Severe wellbore stability issues were reported while drilling in laminated formation with weak planes such as beddings. To accurately determine the safe mud weight according to the changing environment is of primary importance for safety control of drilling. Considering both the elastic and strength anisotropy of bedding formation, a novel theoretical model is established and the stress and failure around wellbores are analyzed. The accuracy and applicability of the theoretical model is verified by in situ field data. For the purpose of fulfilling real-time prediction, the method flowchart of programming is also provided. The results show that the model built can be conveniently used to predict the stress distribution, failure area, and collapse and fracture pressure while drilling, and rather good predictions can be made compared to real field data. In addition, the inhomogeneity of in situ stress and elastic parameters affect the upper limit of the safe mud weight window (SMWW) greater than the lower limit. Negative SMWW may appear with the direction change of the wellbore or weak plane, especially when the azimuths of them change. As to the magnitude of SMWW, the anisotropic effects of Young’s modulus are greater than the Poisson’s ratio. The method established in this paper can greatly help with the precise prediction of wellbore stability as drilling proceeds in bedding formation.


Author(s):  
Sumaya Altamimi ◽  
Dong-Wook Lee ◽  
Imad Barsoum ◽  
Reza Rowshan ◽  
Iwona M. Jasiuk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 106186
Author(s):  
J.M. Insua-Arévalo ◽  
M. Tsige ◽  
J.L. Sánchez-Roldán ◽  
E. Rodríguez-Escudero ◽  
J.J. Martínez-Díaz

2021 ◽  
Vol 710 (1) ◽  
pp. 012025
Author(s):  
Magnus T Aamodt ◽  
Gustav Grimstad ◽  
Steinar Nordal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb Holyoke ◽  
Casey Braccia

<p>Much of our understanding of the strength of the continental crust is based on flow laws derived from homogeneous mono-mineralic aggregates (quartzites).  However, crystal plastic deformation of rocks in the middle to lower continental crust during orogenic events forms foliations, lineations and lattice preferred orientations (LPOs) which produce physical and viscous anisotropies in rocks.  In some of these orogenic events, such as in the Appalachian mountains, multiple deformation events form different, cross-cutting foliations and overprint existing LPOs.  In order to determine the effects foliation/lineation and preexisting LPO have on the strength of rocks in the middle crust, we deformed a natural quartzite with a cross-girdle LPO from the Moine Thrust in Scotland with the compressive stress at six different primary orientations relative to the foliation and lineation. This quartzite has aligned but distributed fine-grained muscovite which defines a foliation and lineation.  The cores were deformed at the same temperature (800°C), pressure (1500 MPa) and strain rate (1.6*10<sup>-6</sup>/s) to similar strains (50-58%), leaving the foliation/lineation orientation as the only difference between experiments.  Peak stresses occur at strains of 10-20% and are lowest for the sample with foliation at 45<sup>o</sup> to the compression direction (400 MPa, the weak orientation).  All other cores (hard orientations) have peak strengths of 600 to 1100 MPa and highest for the cores with lineation perpendicular to the compression direction (1100 MPa). These cores in hard orientations all strain weaken to a similar stress (~500 MPa), but are still ~100 MPa stronger than the core with both foliation and lineation initially oriented at 45 degrees to the compression direction.  Optical microstructures include undulatory extinction, deformation lamellae, and at high strain (58%), the quartzite is more than 50% recrystallized. Scanning electron microscope electron backscatter diffraction analyses indicate that recrystallized grains in all cores reflect the deformation conditions of the experiment and original grains retain their initial LPO.  Strength anisotropy at low strains is due to placing the foliation and lineation at non-ideal (hard) orientations relative to the compression direction and is greatest in cores with the lineation perpendicular to the compression direction.  The evolution to a similar strength at high strains indicates that dynamic recrystallization creates new grains oriented for easy slip in the second (experimental) deformation event. These results suggest that differences in lineation and foliation orientations and a pre-existing LPO may cause strength anisotropy in rocks in the mid to lower continental crust, but this anisotropy may be transient and unlikely to exist to high strains.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document