Dangerous Recreational Activity

Drowning isn’t the only danger in water - some aquatic animals can be deadly. The scuba diver who dies underwater poses a difficult diagnostic dilemma for investigating authorities and pathologists. Barotrauma caused by the failure of a gasfilled body cavity to equalize its internal pressure with changes in the ambient pressure is another cause of death. Investigation should be thorough and follow a standardized outline. This investigation should include the victim’s past medical and social history, dive profile, a detailed history of the terminal event and resuscitation efforts, environmental conditions, examination of the diving equipment and finally the autopsy.

Case report of peritoneal carcinomatosis of plasma cell origin in a patient with newly diagnosed HIV: A terminal event

Background B-cell tumors and plasma cell malignancies have been identified in persons living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV). The literature review has revealed numerous reports of solitary plasmacytomas with metastasis in PLHIV. Case report A young patient with no prior medical or surgical history presented with tumor lysis syndrome secondary to metastatic plasma cell Epstein-Baer virus (EBV) related malignancy with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The history and clinical picture promptly led to the diagnosis of HIV. The subsequent hospital course was dismal, and lifespan was cut short by multi-organ failure. Conclusion This case is being reported to highlight the suspicion of HIV in patients presenting acutely with aggressive plasma cell malignancies.

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in nonresectable carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer

Peritoneal carcinomatosis colorectal cancer unfortunately represents a frequently encountered condition during the natural history of this malignancy which has been considered for a long period of time as a terminal event. However, once new surgical and oncological therapies have been reported significant changes have been reported in the management of these cases. Therefore, cytoreductive surgery to no residual disease as a stand-alone procedure or in association with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy has been proposed and significant benefits in terms of survival have been reported; unfortunately not all patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis are candidates for this combined approach, especially if extended, nonresectable lesions are present. In such cases pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been proposed with promising results. The aim of the current paper is to review the most important studies conducted on this issue.

Event-specific win ratios and testing with terminal and non-terminal events

Background/aims In clinical trials, the primary outcome is often a composite endpoint defined as time to the first occurrence of either death or certain non-fatal events. Thus, a portion of available data would be omitted. In the win ratio approach, priorities are given to the clinically more important events, and more data are used. However, its power may be low if the treatment effect is predominantly on the non-terminal event. Methods We propose event-specific win ratios obtained separately on the terminal and non-terminal events. They can then be used to form global tests such as a linear combination test, the maximum test, or a [Formula: see text] test. Results In simulations, these tests often improve the power of the original win ratio test. Furthermore, when the terminal and non-terminal events experience differential treatment effects, the new tests are often more powerful than the log-rank test for the composite outcome. Whether the treatment effect is primarily on the terminal events or not, the new tests based on the event-specific win ratios can be useful when different types of events are present. The new tests can reject the null hypothesis of no difference in the event distributions in the two treatment arms with the terminal event showing detrimental effect and the non-terminal event showing beneficial effect. The maximum test and the [Formula: see text] test do not have test-estimation coherency, but the maximum test has the coherency that the global null is rejected if and only if the null for one of the event types is rejected. When applied to data from the trial Aldosterone Antagonist Therapy for Adults With Heart Failure and Preserved Systolic Function (TOPCAT), the new tests all reject the null hypothesis of no treatment effect while both the log-rank test used in TOPCAT and the original win ratio approach show non-significant p-values. Conclusion Whether the treatment effect is primarily on the terminal events or the non-terminal events, the maximum test based on the event-specific win ratios can be a useful alternative for testing treatment effect in clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes when different types of events are present.