serum tumor marker
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

109
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 2553-2560
Author(s):  
Yunqi Bao ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Dandan Shi ◽  
Weili Bai ◽  
Dongdong He ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yu-Hsueh Wu ◽  
Ping-Yi Lin ◽  
Ju-Hsuan Yang ◽  
Ying-Shiung Kuo ◽  
Yang-Che Wu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Moon WS ◽  
◽  
Ahn AR ◽  
Song JS ◽  
Yang JD ◽  
...  

A 68-year-old man presented to our hospital for the evaluation of an incidentally detected pancreatic mass. Serum tumor marker levels were within normal limits. On delayed-phase computed tomography, a homogeneous enhancing 1.8 cm-sized hypervascular mass was detected in the pancreatic head (Figure 1). As the radiologic impression was that of a neuroendocrine tumor, the patient underwent pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodectomy. Microscopically, the tumor exhibited typical features of pancreatic solid hamartoma (Figure 2). Pancreatic solid hamartoma is an extremely rare entity that shows components that are present in the normal pancreas with distorted architecture and are considered as malformative lesions. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult because the clinicopathological features of solid hamartoma have not yet been fully clarified. The radiologic findings in this mass were similar to those of a neuroendocrine tumor. All patients with pancreatic hamartomas present with a benign clinical course. Recognition of this entity is desirable to avoid unnecessary extended surgical resection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Ahmad Nugroho ◽  
Johan Renaldo ◽  
Wahjoe Djatisoesanto

The purpose of this study to describe patientscharacteristics, correlation between stagingnon-seminomacancer and chemotherapyresponse. Data on age, location of tumor, staging, serum levels of the tumor marker post operative, adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy side effects, and response of patient to chemotherapy were gained from medical records inSoetomo Hospital Surabaya from January 2012 to December 2015, and analyzed with SPSS. Correlation between staging and chemotherapyresponse, correlation primary tumor staging (pT) and Metastasis (M), correlation regional lymph nodes staging (N) and metastasis (M), correlation serum tumor marker and chemotherapy response was proccessed by Spearman correlation test. There were no significant correlation between pT staging and M and no significant correlation between N and M staging. Based on tumor markers (S), mostly patients were S2. There were no significant correlation between the response to chemotherapy and serum tumor marker levels. In category of staging group, the mostare 14 patientsstage III. BEP was the most adjuvant Chemotherapy.Nausea and vomiting were The most complained during chemotherapy. Anemia were the most hematologic side effects of chemotherapy.There are no significant correlation between the staging of non-seminoma and the response to chemotherapy. Conclusion: Non seminoma mostly happened in young males. Non-seminoma responses to chemotherapy. Patients in early stage would give a good response to chemotherapy compared to those with advanced stage. After chemotherapy, evaluation should be done to the patients' complaints and complete blood count to detect side effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 113-121
Author(s):  
David Lang ◽  
Wolfgang Haslinger ◽  
Kaveh Akbari ◽  
Mario Scala ◽  
Benedikt Hergan ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Xu ◽  
Jian Song ◽  
Beizheng Xu ◽  
Jiang Wang ◽  
Jianjun Mao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study is designed to investigate the clinical value of systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic interventional cryotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. Methods A total of 412 lung cancer patients admitted to Cangzhou People’s Hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were collected and divided into test group and control group based on their treatment schedules. The test group received systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic interventional cryotherapy, while the control group received systemic chemotherapy alone. Tumor objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), serum tumor marker levels, serum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) content, T cell subset level, survival time and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed. Results The ORR and DCR of the test group were better than those of the control group, while those of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the test group were better than patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (P <  0.05). There was no significant difference in serum tumor marker levels, MMP content and T cell subset level between the two groups before treatment. After treatment, the serum tumor marker levels along with serum MMP-2, MMP-9 and CD8+ levels in the test group decreased more remarkably, while CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels increased more significantly than those in the control group (P <  0.05). The serum MMP-2 and MMP-9 of NSCLC patients in the test group decreased more remarkably than those of SCLC patients, while there was no significant difference in CD8+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+. The progression-free survival and overall survival of the test group were obviously longer than those of the control group. The same trend was observed in NSCLC patients compared with SCLC patients in the test group (P <  0.05). Conclusions Systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic interventional cryotherapy for lung cancer has good clinical efficacy and safety, and can be widely used in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Achmad Nugroho ◽  
Johan Renaldo ◽  
Wahjoe Djatisoesanto

The purpose of this study was to describe patients’ characteristics, correlation between staging non-seminoma cancer and chemotherapy response. Data on age, location of tumor, staging, serum levels of the tumor marker post operative, adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy side effects, and response of patient to chemotherapy were gained from medical records in Soetomo Hospital Surabaya from January 2012 to December 2015, and analyzed with SPSS. Correlation between staging and chemotherapy response, correlation primary tumor staging (pT) and Metastasis (M), correlation regional lymph nodes staging (N) and metastasis (M), correlation serum tumor marker and chemotherapy response was proccessed by Spearman correlation test. There were no significant correlation between pT staging and M and no significant correlation between N and M staging. Based on tumor markers (S), mostly patients were S2. There were no significant correlation between the response to chemotherapy and serum tumor marker levels. In category of staging group, the most are 14 patients stage III. BEP was the most adjuvant Chemotherapy. Nausea and vomiting were The most complained during chemotherapy. Anemia were the most hematologic side effects of chemotherapy. There are no significant correlation between the staging of non-seminoma and the response to chemotherapy. Conclusion: Non seminoma mostly happened in young males. Non-seminoma responses to chemotherapy. Patients in early stage would give a good response to chemotherapy compared to those with advanced stage. After chemotherapy, evaluation should be done to the patients' complaints and complete blood count to detect side effects. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document