boron removal
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

397
(FIVE YEARS 88)

H-INDEX

48
(FIVE YEARS 7)

Desalination ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 526 ◽  
pp. 115548
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Mingjie Wei ◽  
Zhe Zhang ◽  
Xiansong Shi ◽  
Yong Wang

Chemosphere ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 133587
Author(s):  
A. Yagmur Goren ◽  
Yasar K. Recepoglu ◽  
Ahmet Karagunduz ◽  
Alireza Khataee ◽  
Yeojoon Yoon

2022 ◽  
pp. 112639
Author(s):  
Ge Yan ◽  
Liang Fu ◽  
Xin Lu ◽  
Yutong Xie ◽  
Jiayi Zhao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Turan Gulcin Torunoglu ◽  
Korkmaz Burak ◽  
Yavuz Erdem ◽  
Senkal Bahire Filiz

Author(s):  
Şahin AKPINAR ◽  
Hasan KOÇYİĞİT ◽  
Fatma GÜRBÜZ ◽  
Mehmet ODABAŞI

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 654-663
Author(s):  
Yu Chang Kim ◽  
Sungil Lim ◽  
Bangwoo Han ◽  
Sang Bok Kim ◽  
Inyong Park ◽  
...  

Objectives : This article provides a comparative analysis of boron removal for brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO), boron selective ion exchange (IX), or capacitive deionization (CDI) processes. Permeate of 1st-Pass RO process has to be post-treated for additional boron removal. Hence, we experimentally analyzed the performance of boron removal and specific energy consumption (SEC) of three aforementioned processes and investigated whether the processes are suitable for 2nd pass process of RO desalination.Methods : Raw feed water was prepared using NaCl and B(OH)3. Semi-pilot scale RO and IX systems (over 1 m3/hr capacity) and bench scale CDI system (over 2.5 L/min) were tested for performance comparison. Boron concentration was measured using Azomethine-H method for feed and product water. Energy consumption was monitored by using power quality analyzer.Results and Discussion : Each process has its own operating conditions. The RO process required high pH of feed water for high boron removal rate, the IX process was operated below breakthrough point considering adsorption capacity of boron selective resin, and the CDI process didn’t remove boron because chloride ion has higher ion selectivity for carbon electrode than boron. In terms of SEC, the pressure-driven RO process showed the highest SEC among three processes. The CDI process based on electrical adsorption of carbon electrode showed a considerable energy consumption as well. On the other hand, the IX process was operated at low energy consumption because its removal is just based on adsorption-desorption mechanism.Conclusions : The RO and CDI processes have received a lot of attention as leading and emerging technology while the IX process was regarded as a stubborn process because of regeneration of resin and its several segmentalized steps. However, we found that the IX process has a better performance for boron removal and energy consumption.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 2284-2292
Author(s):  
Jinmei Li ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Baoyu Gao ◽  
Zhining Wang

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 731
Author(s):  
Ikhlass Marzouk Trifi ◽  
Lobna Chaabane ◽  
Lasâad Dammak ◽  
Lassaad Baklouti ◽  
Béchir Hamrouni

The removal of boron by Donnan dialysis from aqueous solutions has been studied according to response surface methodology (RSM). First, a preliminary study was performed with two membranes (AFN and ACS) in order to determine the experimental field based on different parameters, such as the pH of the feed compartment, the concentration of counter-ions in the receiver compartment, and the concentration of boron in the feed compartment. The best removal rate of boron was 75% with the AFN membrane, but only 48% with the ACS membrane. Then, a full-factor design was developed to determine the influence of these parameters and their interactions on the removal of boron by Donnan dialysis. The pH of the feed compartment was found to be the most important parameter. The RSM was applied according to the Doehlert model to determine the optimum conditions ([B] = 66 mg/L, pH = 11.6 and [Cl–] = 0.5 mol/L) leading to 88.8% of boron removal with an AFN membrane. The use of the RSM can be considered a good solution to determine the optimum condition for 13.8% compared to the traditional “one-at-a-time” method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document