crop modeling
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

152
(FIVE YEARS 60)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
Vol 262 ◽  
pp. 107429
Author(s):  
Olufemi P. Abimbola ◽  
Trenton E. Franz ◽  
Daran Rudnick ◽  
Derek Heeren ◽  
Haishun Yang ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 276 ◽  
pp. 108394
Author(s):  
Yubin Yang ◽  
Lloyd T. Wilson ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Livia Paleari ◽  
Roberto Confalonieri ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 126419
Author(s):  
Alireza Araghi ◽  
Christopher J. Martinez ◽  
Jørgen E. Olesen

Author(s):  
Caio Teodoro Menezes ◽  
Derblai Casaroli ◽  
Alexandre Bryan Heinemann ◽  
Vinicius Cintra Moschetti ◽  
Rafael Battisti

2022 ◽  
pp. 96-113
Author(s):  
T. M. DeJong

Abstract Tree crop modeling could be instrumental in facilitating integration of numerous aspects of the development, growth and physiology of fruit tree crops and provide a valuable tool for testing concepts for understanding how fruit trees work, if it could be achieved. This chapter presents a synopsis of how modeling of fruit trees was approached. It focuses on the development of a mechanistic, compartmental model of mature peach tree carbon partitioning over a growing season. The model was termed a compartmental model because carbohydrates were only distributed to the collective compartments of fruits, leaves, stems and large branches, and the trunk according to their relative demand functions as the season progressed. Roots were only given carbohydrates when the demands of all of the other organs were fulfilled. This model demonstrated that carbohydrate partitioning in trees could be modeled without deterministic, empirically derived, partitioning coefficients and was useful for indicating periods of the growing season when calculated photosynthetic assimilation was not adequate to supply calculated carbohydrate demands of growing organs. The development of the described model is so complex that the modeling work will never be fully completed. However, to demonstrate the utility of this modeling approach, it was decided to develop an L-Almond model using the same approach.


2021 ◽  
pp. 301-324
Author(s):  
Lin Liu ◽  
◽  
Bruno Basso ◽  

This chapter discusses existing yield forecasting systems in which the yield forecasts are driven by integration of different data sources, such as output of crop modeling, remote sensing and gridded climate datasets. It first provides overviews of the two predominant modeling approaches— crop simulation modeling and statistical modeling— to forecasting crop yield, with an emphasis on their respective use for operational crop yield forecasting systems. The chapter then briefly describes the accuracy and lead time of the existing yield forecasting models. Lastly, it provides a case study that integrates digital tools, field surveys, and crop modeling to provide on-time maize yield forecasts in small fields in Tanzania. The chapter concludes with a summary and future perspectives for research.


Author(s):  
Ru Xu ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Kaiyu Guan ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Bin Peng ◽  
...  

Abstract How maize yield responds to precipitation variability in space and time over broader scales is largely unknown compared with the well-understood temperature response, even though precipitation change is more erratic with greater spatial heterogeneity. Here, we develop a method to quantify the spatially explicit precipitation response of maize yield using statistical data and crop models in the contiguous United States. We find the precipitation responses are highly heterogeneous with inverted-U (40.3%) being the leading response type, followed by unresponsive (30.39 %), and linear increase (28.6%). The optimal precipitation threshold derived from inverted-U response exhibits considerable spatial variations, which is higher under wetter, hotter, and well-drainage conditions but lower under drier and poor-drainage conditions. Irrigation alters precipitation response by making yield either unresponsive to precipitation or having lower optimal thresholds than rainfed conditions. We further find that the observed precipitation responses of maize yield are misrepresented in crop models, with a too high percentage of increase type (59.0% versus 29.6%) and an overestimation in optimal precipitation threshold by ~90 mm. These two factors explain about 30% and 85% of the inter-model yield overestimation biases under extreme rainfall conditions. Our study highlights the large spatial heterogeneity and the key role of human management in the precipitation responses of maize yield, which need to be better characterized in crop modeling and food security assessment under climate change.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 6541-6569
Author(s):  
Phillip D. Alderman

Abstract. The Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Cropping Systems Model (DSSAT-CSM) is a widely used crop modeling system that has been integrated into large-scale modeling frameworks. Existing frameworks generate spatially explicit simulated outputs at grid points through an inefficient process of translation from binary spatially referenced inputs to point-specific text input files, followed by translation and aggregation back from point-specific text output files to binary spatially referenced outputs. The main objective of this paper was to document the design and implementation of a parallel gridded simulation framework for DSSAT-CSM. A secondary objective was to provide preliminary analysis of execution time and scaling of the new parallel gridded framework. The parallel gridded framework includes improved code for model-internal data transfer, gridded input–output with the Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) library, and parallelization of simulations using the Message Passing Interface (MPI). Validation simulations with the DSSAT-CSM-CROPSIM-CERES-Wheat model revealed subtle discrepancies in simulated yield due to the rounding of soil parameters in the input routines of the standard DSSAT-CSM. Utilizing NetCDF for direct input–output produced a 3.7- to 4-fold reduction in execution time compared to R- and text-based input–output. Parallelization improved execution time for both versions with between 12.2- (standard version) and 13.4-fold (parallel gridded version) speed-up when comparing 1 to 16 compute cores. Estimates of parallelization of computation ranged between 99.2 % (standard version) and 97.3 % (parallel gridded version), indicating potential for scaling to higher numbers of compute cores.


Plant Direct ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubí Raymundo ◽  
Sarah Sexton‐Bowser ◽  
Ignacio A. Ciampitti ◽  
Geoffrey P. Morris
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document