How to Prevent, Reduce, and Treat Severe Post Sympathetic Chain Compensatory Hyperhidrosis: 2021 State of the Art

The role of thoracic surgery in the management of hyperhidrosis is well-known and thoracoscopic sympathetic interruption is commonly accepted as being the most effective treatment. However, some concerns still remain regarding the potential to develop compensatory hyperidrosis (CH), the most troublesome and frequent side effect after surgery and its management. Compensatory hyperidrosis prevention may be achieved by identifying subjects at higher risk and/or targeting nerve interruption level on the base of single patient characteristics gathered during the preoperative survey. Furthermore, the surgical treatment may consist of different techniques aimed at reversing the effects of previous sympathetic interruption. To predict CH after sympathectomy, the most interesting proposals in recent literature are a temporary thoracoscopic sympathetic block and the introduction of new and targeted preoperative surveys. If the role of nerve clipping technique vs. the definitive cutting is still intensely under debated, new approaches have been recently proposed to reduce the incidence of CH. In particular, extended sympathicotomy has been described as an alternative to overcome severe forms. Last, among the techniques developed to reverse sympathetic interruption effect, diffuse sympathicotomy (DS) and microsurgical sympathetic trunk reconstruction represent advances in this field. An all-round review of these topics is strongly needed. Our aim is to cover all the above issues point by point. Although sympathectomy represents a small part of thoracic surgery, we believe that it is worthy of interest because of the profound effect that complications for a benign condition can have on patients.

Selective T3–T4 sympathicotomy versus gray ramicotomy on outcome and quality of life in hyperhidrosis patients: a randomized clinical trial

Compensatory hyperhidrosis is the leading cause of patients' dissatisfaction after thoracic sympathicotomy. The study aimed to reduce compensatory hyperhidrosis to increase patients’ satisfaction. A prospective randomized study on palmar hyperhidrosis, May 2016–September 2019. Twenty-one patients T3–T4 sympathicotomy and 21 T3–T4 gray ramicotomy. Data prospectively collected. Analysis at study's end. Focus on the sweating, temperature, quality of life baseline and postoperatively, compensatory hyperhidrosis, hand dryness, patients' satisfaction, and if they would undergo the procedure again and recommend it. No baseline differences between groups. Hyperhidrosis was controlled postoperatively in all patients. No mortality, serious complications, or recurrences. Sympathicotomy worse postoperative quality of life (49.05 (SD: 15.66, IR: 35.50–63.00) versus ramicotomy 24.30 (SD: 6.02, IR: 19.75–27.25). After ramicotomy, some residual sweating on the face, hands, and axillae. Compensatory sweating worse with sympathicotomy. Satisfaction higher with ramicotomy. Better results with ramicotomy than sympathicotomy regarding hand dryness, how many times a day the patients had to shower or change clothes, intention to undergo the procedure again or recommend it to somebody else, and how bothersome compensatory hyperhidrosis was. T3–T4 gray ramicotomy had better results than T3–T4 sympathicotomy, with less compensatory sweating and higher patients' satisfaction.

The Effect of T3 versus T4 Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy on Hyperhidrosis

Background: Primary hyperhidrosis is a disorder characterized by excessive sweating. However, surgical therapy is the most effective treatment for patients with primary hyperhidrosis. In between all different surgical approaches, video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sympathectomy has been considered as a safe and minimally invasive procedure for palmer and axillary hyperhidrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of T3 vs. T4 sympathectomy regarding postoperative complications, recurrence and compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) on 6 months follow up. Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted over 20 patients undergoing VATS sympathectomy diagnosed with palmar hyperhidrosis and failed medical treatment and undergoing thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Patients were divided randomly into two groups; group A (T3 sympathectomy) and group B (T4 sympathectomy). Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the degree of treatment success, compensatory hyperhidrosis after one month and after 6 months. There was non-significant difference between the two groups regarding the recurrence, late postoperative complications and satisfaction. Conclusions: Video-assisted T3 or T4 sympathectomy is a safe and effective procedure for treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis and T3 or T4 sympathectomy had no difference regarding to dryness and Compensatory Hyperhidrosis in follow-up for 6 months. Both techniques were effective for treating palmar hyperhidrosis with high rates of success and no recurrence for 6 months.

Bilateral one-stage single-port sympathicotomy in primary focal hyperhidrosis, a prospective cohort study: treat earlier?

Background Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis (PFH) has a detrimental effect on Quality of Life. Repetitive, non-curative symptomatic strategies dominate current treatment of PFH, in spite of the availability of an effective and permanent curative treatment like Endoscopic Thoracic Sympathectomy (ETS). Current surgical optimization may allow for a re-established position of sympathetic modulation in this treatment algorithm. We sought to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and long-term results of a Bilateral One-stage Single-port Sympathicotomy (BOSS) procedure in PFH patients and to identify subgroups benefitting most. Methods Prospective analysis of 163 patients, 35 (21.5%) underwent Rib-3 (R3) BOSS for palmar PFH, 58 (35.6%) R3-R5 BOSS for axillary PFH and 70 (42.9%) R3-R5 BOSS for combined palmar/axillary PFH. Effectiveness was measured using Skindex-29 and the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS). Results Overall Skindex-29-rating (46.5 ± 14.8 preoperatively vs 20.1 ± 20.6 postoperatively, p < 0.001), and HDSS score (3.71 ± 0.45 preoperatively vs 1.82 ± 0.86 postoperatively, p < 0.001) indicated a significant improvement in health-related quality of life after BOSS. R3 BOSS was superior to R3-R5 BOSS in terms of HDSS score (1.49 vs 1.91 respectively, p = 0.004) and in terms of severe compensatory hyperhidrosis, a frequently reported side-effect (17.1% vs 32.8% respectively, p < 0.001). No major complications occurred. Conclusions BOSS is safe, effective, and offers a long-term curative solution in the treatment of PFH. Especially in the palmar PFH subgroup, R3 BOSS treatment results compare favorably to the treatment results of non-curative alternatives published in the current literature. Therefore, R3 BOSS should be offered to all patients with severe PFH, reporting insufficient benefit of treatment options such as oral and/or local agents.

Plantar hyperhidrosis associated with primary palmar hyperhidrosis: Outcome following video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Introduction Primary palmar hyperhidrosis is an abnormal over-sweating of palms. It is usually associated with plantar hyperhidrosis. Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy is the treatment of choice for palmar hyperhidrosis; however, it may affect plantar hyperhidrosis. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of thoracoscopic sympathectomy on plantar hyperhidrosis. Methods This prospective study included patients who presented to the Cardiothoracic Surgery Department with primary palmo-planter hyperhidrosis and received thoracoscopic sympathectomy between January 2014 and December 2018. Preoperatively, patients scored subjectively the degree of palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis on Visual Analogue Scale. Following surgery, scoring was performed at three intervals: 7, 30, and 180 days. Presence of compensatory sweating and its scoring was obtained at the same intervals. Complications and patient satisfaction were recorded. Results A total of 518 patients were included. Complication rate, excluding compensatory hyperhidrosis, was 2.7%. Preoperative Visual Analogue Scale score for palmar hyperhidrosis was 9.9 ± 3.8 that following thoracoscopic sympathectomy decreased to 0.041 ± 0.2 on the seventh postoperative day. Further decrease to 0.3 ± 0.16 was noted on the 30th day and 180th day postoperatively. Preoperative Visual Analogue Scale score for plantar hyperhidrosis was 9.54 ± 0.66 that following sympathectomy decreased to 2.27 ± 1.67 on the seventh postoperative day. However, slight insignificant increase was noted to become 2.73 ± 1.65 on the 30th day and 6th month postoperatively. Compensatory hyperhidrosis was recorded in 3.9% of patients at 6th month postoperatively. Conclusion Palmar hyperhidrosis is usually associated with plantar hyperhidrosis. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy is an effective and safe treatment for palmar hyperhidrosis. It may completely or partially cure plantar hyperhidrosis.

Selective T3-T4 Sympathicotomy Versus Gray Ramicotomy On Outcome And Quality Of Life In Hyperhidrosis Patients. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: compensatory hyperhidrosis is the leading cause of patients' dissatisfaction after thoracic sympathicotomy.Objective: to reduce compensatory hyperhidrosis to increase patients' satisfaction. Patients and methods: a prospective randomized study on palmar hyperhidrosis, May 2016-September, 2019. Twenty-one patients T3-T4 sympathicotomy and 21 T3-T4 gray ramicotomy. Data prospectively collected. Analysis at study's end. Focus on the sweating, temperature, quality of life baseline and postoperatively, compensatory hyperhidrosis, hand dryness, patients' satisfaction, and if they would undergo the procedure again and would recommend it.Results: No baseline differences between groups. Hyperhidrosis was controlled postoperatively in all patients. No mortality, serious complications, or recurrences. Sympathicotomy worse postoperative quality of life (49.05 (SD: 15.66, IR: 35.50-63.00) versus ramicotomy 24.30 (SD: 6.02, IR: 19.75-27.25). After ramicotomy, some residual sweating on the face, hands, and axillae. Compensatory sweating worse with sympathicotomy. Satisfaction higher with ramicotomy. Better results with ramicotomy than sympathicotomy regarding hand dryness, how many times a day the patients had to shower or change clothes, intention to undergo the procedure again or recommend it to somebody else, and how bothersome compensatory hyperhidrosis was.Conclusions: T3-T4 gray ramicotomy had better results than T3-T4 sympathicotomy, with less compensatory sweating and higher patients' satisfaction.