Peripheral blood eosinophil count is associated with response to chemoimmunotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Introduction: There is evidence for an association between peripheral blood eosinophil count (PBEC) and response to cancer immunotherapy; however, such data is limited in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Patients & methods: This report presents patients (n = 14) who received a combination of durvalumab and paclitaxel for mTNBC (NCT02628132). Results: There was a statistically significant correlation (p = 0.028) between an increase in PBEC (>300/mm3) during treatment and response to the combination therapy. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant association between progression-free survival and increased PBEC, after therapy (p = 0.005). A similar trend existed for overall survival, although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.167). Conclusion: This is the first study to report on eosinophilia in mTNBC treated with chemoimmunotherapy and supports a role for eosinophils in immunotherapy for mTNBC.

Saudi Arabian real-life experience with biologic therapy in severe asthma

Background: Severe asthma (SA) is a common health problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality and high medical costs. Biological therapies have emerged in recent decades as promising treatment options for patients with high type 2 (T2) SA. This retrospective observational study from Saudi Arabia aimed to investigate the effects of additional biologics therapy on reducing oral corticosteroid (OCS) consumption, frequency of asthma exacerbations, improvement in lung function, and asthma control.Methods: This multicenter observational study enrolled a cohort of 97 patients from Mach 2019 to February 2021. Outcomes of anti-IgE, anti-IL5/IL5R, and anti-IL4R therapies in severe type 2 asthma were recorded and analyzed in terms of number of exacerbations (emergency visits or hospitalizations required), asthma symptoms, and use of oral corticosteroids, blood eosinophil count, asthma control according to GINA classification, and FEV1 before and during biologic therapy.Results: Ninety-seven patients were included in the analysis The mean age was 46.7±14.1 years, and 69.1% of them were female. The average duration of biological treatment was 16.4±6.8 months. At the time of data collection, the four biologic therapies reduced the exacerbation rate per year from 82/97 (84.5%) to 14/97 (14.4%) with a percent improvement of 83% from 2.9 per year in the year before biologic treatment to 1.6 per year (p<0.001). OCS was reduced from 75/97 (77.3%) to 10/97 (10.3%) for a percent improvement of 86.7%, and the average OCS dose decreased from 7.12 mg to 6.8 mg. Mean blood eosinophil count also decreased after biologic therapy from 750.5±498.5 to 188.0±122.4 cells/μl, most significant result achieved with benralizumab, and mean FEV1 improved from 59.0±12.9% to 76.0±10.2%, most significant result achieved with omalizumab. ll patients had uncontrolled asthma before biologics therapy, but asthma control improved by 91.8% after treatment.Conclusions: Biologic as add-on therapy for high T2 SA was found to reduce asthma exacerbations, systemic glucocorticoid doses, and SA symptoms.

Blood eosinophils to guide inhaled maintenance therapy in a primary care COPD population

Blood eosinophils are a potentially useful biomarker for guiding inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment decisions in COPD. We investigated whether existing blood eosinophil counts predict benefit from initiation of ICS compared to bronchodilator therapy.We used routinely collected data from UK primary care in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants were ≥40 years with COPD, ICS-naïve and starting a new inhaled maintenance medication (intervention group: ICS; comparator group: long-acting bronchodilator, non-ICS). Primary outcome was time-to-first exacerbation, compared between ICS and non-ICS groups, stratified by blood eosinophils (“high” (≥150/µL) and “low” (<150/µL) groups).Of 9475 eligible patients, 53.9% initiated ICS and 46.1% non-ICS treatment with no difference in eosinophils between treatment groups (p=0.71). Exacerbation risk was higher in patients prescribed ICS than non-ICS, but with a lower risk in those with “high” eosinophils (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.10) than “low” eosinophils (1.19, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.31) (p value for interaction=0.01). Risk of pneumonia hospitalisation with ICS was greatest in those with “low” eosinophils (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50; p value for interaction=0.04). Results were similar whether the most recent blood eosinophil count or the mean of blood eosinophil counts was used.In a primary care population, the most recent blood eosinophil count could be used to guide initiation of ICS in COPD patients. We suggest that ICS should be considered in those with higher eosinophils and avoided in those with lower eosinophils (<150/µL).

Effect of atorvastatin on serum periostin and blood eosinophils in asthma – a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

Objective To investigate the effect of atorvastatin on serum periostin level and blood eosinophil count in patients with asthma. Methods Patients diagnosed with asthma were enrolled and randomised into an intervention or placebo group, to receive 40 mg atorvastatin or similar placebo, daily, for 8 weeks. Spirometry was performed at baseline, and at the end of weeks 4 and 8; patients also provided blood samples and completed an asthma control test (ACT) at baseline and at the end of week 8. Primary study outcomes were blood eosinophil count and serum periostin levels. Results Eighty patients completed the study (40 per group). Mean ACT scores were similar between the intervention and placebo groups at baseline (17.95 ± 3.75 versus 17.98 ± 3.77, respectively), and improved in the intervention group (19.88 ± 3.28), but remained unchanged in the placebo group (18.6 ± 3.26) during the treatment period. No statistically significant differences in spirometric changes, blood eosinophil count or serum periostin levels were observed between the groups during the treatment period. Conclusion Spirometric parameters and inflammatory markers did not change significantly in response to atorvastatin treatment, and did not differ between the placebo and intervention groups.

Smoking Status Modifies the Relationship between Th2 Biomarkers and Small Airway Obstruction in Asthma

Background. Cigarette smoking and Th2-inflammation are both crucial in the pathogenesis of asthma. However, it is unknown whether smoking can affect the association between Th2-inflammation and small airway obstruction in adults with asthma. Methods. Adults diagnosed with asthma by a pulmonologist according to Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines were recruited from September 2016 to April 2018 to participate in this study. Participants were divided into two groups, the small airway obstruction group (those with FEF25–75% predicted value ≤ 65%) and the normal small airway function group (those with FEF25–75% predicted value > 65%). Final data analysis included 385 and 93 people in the Obstructive Group and the Normal Group, respectively. Total serum IgE level and blood eosinophil count were used as biomarkers of the Th2 phenotype. Results. The Obstructive Group had a larger fraction of smokers, higher blood eosinophil count, and lower lung function than the Normal Group. Current-smoking status was associated with an increased risk of small airway obstruction (adjusted odds ratio = 4.677, 95% confidence interval [1.593–13.730]); and log-IgE level was associated with a decreased risk of small airway obstruction (0.403 [0.216–0.754]). Smoking status stratified analysis showed an association between log-IgE level and a decreased risk of small airway obstruction only in never-smoker asthmatics (0.487 [0.249–0.954]). Conclusions. Current-smoking status and total serum IgE are, respectively, associated with small airway obstruction. Smoking status modifies the relationship between Th2 biomarkers and small airway function. These findings contribute to the understanding of risk factors associated with asthma endotyping.

Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count Optimizes Pembrolizumab-Based Immunotherapy in The First-Line Setting of Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

For cancer immunotherapy, the tumor proportion score for the programmed death-1 ligand is not a robust biomarker. The peripheral blood eosinophil count (PEC) is a potential alternative. However, it is not yet established. To test the efficacy of PEC-guided selection of pembrolizumab monotherapy (MONO) or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (COMBO), we retrospectively reviewed data of patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the first-line setting (April 2017 to April 2020). Among 137 patients enrolled, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the MONO (n = 84) and COMBO (n = 53) therapies. The influence of PEC before the second administration of each regimen (PEC2) was evaluated. The low PEC2 subgroup (<150 × 106/L) receiving MONO had poorer survival rates than those receiving COMBO (median progression-free survival [mPFS]: 5.75 vs. 7.59 months and median overall survival [mOS]: 12.0 months vs. not reached [NR), respectively). In patients receiving MONO, the low PEC2 showed worse prognosis compared with the high PEC2 group (mPFS: 5.75 vs. 16.1 months and mOS: 12.0 months vs. NR, respectively). PEC2 can be a potential predictive/prognostic biomarker for MONO, which encourages the switch from MONO to COMBO to avoid treatment failure.

Study of Eosinophil Count in Nasal and Peripheral Blood Smear Compare with Serum IgE Level in Children with Allergic Rhinitis

Introduction: Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common respiratory diseases. Patient with allergic rhinitis may have elevated level of serum IgE and eosinophil than normal person. Nasal smear eosinophil count is a simple test as well as noninvasive, can be repeated and inexpensive method for diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Objective: To assess the eosinophil count in nasal smear as an alternative diagnostic test for children with allergic rhinitis. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Laboratory medicine and Paediatrics, BSMMU, Dhaka from September 2019 to August 2020 in 120 children (Age up to 18 years both sex). Diagnosed patients of allergic rhinitis according to ARIA-WHO guideline with history and clinical feature who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected as study population. After taking informed written consent blood and nasal secretion of allergic patient were drawn for serum IgE and eosinophil count. Nasal smears for eosinophil were stained using Giemsa stain and observed eosinophil under light microscope. Peripheral blood eosinophil count was estimated by hematology auto-analyzer (SYSMEX-XN 2000) and rechecked manually. The serum total IgE level was performed based on sandwich principle of ELISA. Results: The serum IgE level, nasal smear eosinophil count and blood eosinophil count were found increased with severity of allergic rhinitis, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). Pearson’s correlation coefficient test revealed significant positive correlation between nasal smear eosinophil count with serum IgE (r= +.656, p<0.001) and blood absolute eosinophil count (r= +.415, p<0.001). Conclusion: Nasal smear eosinophil count was significantly raised alone with absolute eosinophil count and serum IgE level with the severity of allergic rhinitis in children.