The functions of pauses in penginyongan daily conversation

The role of language in daily communication is undoubtedly important because language as a means of communication convey message from speaker to hearer. In the process of transferring message, particularly in oral communication, speaker and hearer may undergo some hesitation and silence cannot be avoided. Silence becomes one specific feature in oral communication. Pause and other phenomenon of spontaneous speech are commonly connected to changes in speakers’ responsiveness in a stable interpersonal situation. Daily conversation is a social praxis that encompasses human life and it is usually conducted in local or indegenous language. Pauses are widely found in this type of exchange and thus the importance of pause in oral talk is worth-analyzing. This paper tries to find out the functions of pauses in Penginyongan daily conversation. Penginyongan is a variant of Javanese language spoken along Serayu River. This research was conducted by using empirical data which were collected by using recording and in-depth interview. Participants of the research were native speaker without considering their sexes. Pauses in Penginyongan daily conversation are used for keeping a secret, refusal, acceptance, end a conversation, and changing topic. A further research needs to develop to gain the insight of pause phenomenon in Penginyongan related to participants’ sexes.

The Populist Identity of the Promoters of Alternative Medicine

In this paper, the author compares phenomena of political populism and alternative medicine on the ground of – similar in structure and content – narrations (and identities created on their basis) of propagators and followers of these ideas/ social praxis. The main thesis of the paper is the assumption that the narrative and identity mechanisms of alternative medicine are analogous to those of political populism. The author tries to prove it in the context of their relation to their counterparts in the mainstream of power/knowledge, with the assumption that these are dialectical relations understood in a specific manner. The oppositions of populism–liberal democracy and alternative medicine–conventional medicine are real, but in the broader sense, they complement and need each other to preserve the cores of the system, which implicates ineffectiveness of those alternative discourses. This article presents examples of anti-elitism and conspiratorial thinking both in political populism and in alternative medicine. It turns out that populism and unconventional medicine are so closely connected that alternative medicine, in its attitudes, refers not only to medical statements, but also to political ones.

Avaliação, monitoramento e acompanhamento do processo formativo na RCT: aspectos teórico-práticos e operacionais

The article at stake approaches thematic related to the evaluation, monitoring and accompaniment of the Rede ColaborAção Tocantins (RCT) developed in the pandemic period. The present reflection has objective to problematize the instrumental conception of the education and the evaluation by means of theoretician-philosophical reflection, which understands the education as social práxis, based on principles of the democratic management and the substantive formation. The study which originated this text was carried through in the perspective critical-dialectic, starting from the empirical reality understood as complex reality, contradictory and mediatized by multiples determinative. The study provided - as a theoretical-practical result – the explanation of the philosophical, political and methodological foundations of evaluation, monitoring and follow-up in the instrumental and substantive perspectives, as well as this enabled the composition of a set of criteria and procedures applicable to training in municipal education management. The discussion includes, in addition to the theoretical and practical aspects of management, evaluation, monitoring and accompaniment, the practical operational aspects of the training process.

Between Affects and Norms

This article seeks to explore the meaning of emotional content in a transnational public sphere, in particular with regard to the concept of solidarity. The main normative question that the author discusses here is how far it is possible – if it’s the case at all – to move beyond the basic structure of nation-linked patriotic feeling to solidarity as a transnational political emotion. He divides his argument into two steps. First, he analyzes how the concept of constitutional patriotism could be reframed around the contours of post-national contexts. He suggests that Hegel’s concept of patriotism as a political disposition can contribute to a transnational framework. In a second step, the author discusses solidarity as a transnational political emotion, arguing that one should have in view both its formative process and its contingencies in order to understand the institutional and symbolic mediation of affective contents of social praxis.

Mengulik Akar Kritis dalam Analisis Wacana Kritis dan Implementasinya Terhadap Teks Berita (Exploring Critical Roots in Critical Discourse Analysis and Its Implementation on News Text)

Paradigma atau pemikiran kritis memandang bahwa individu tidaklah dianggap sebagai subjek yang netral yang bisa menafsirkan secara bebas sesuai dengan pikirannya karena dipengaruhi oleh kekuatan sosial yang ada di masyarakat. Bahasa/teks merupakan representasi yang berperan dalam membentuk subjek tertentu, tema wacana tertentu, maupun strategi di dalamnya. Reproduksi realitas dalam suatu teks pada dasarnya sangat dipengaruhi oleh bahasa, simbolisasi pemaknaan dan politik penandaan. Praksis sosial memerlukan makna dan makna tidak bisa lepas dari bahasa. Makna mempertajam serta memengaruhi segala sesuatu yang dilakukan seseorang, maka semua praktik sosial tidak bisa lepas dari dimensi wacana.Analisis wacana termasuk dalam kategori paradigma kritis.Oleh karenanya, istilah analisis wacana kritis hadir untuk membedah kuasa-kuasa dalam teks. Analisis wacana kritis digunakan untuk membongkar kuasa yang ada dalam setiap proses bahasa, batasan yang diperkenankan menjadi wacana, perspektif yang digunakan, dan topik yang dibicarakan, yang dalam berupa teks berita. Analisis wacana kritis yang digunakan mengacu pada model Van Dijk. Kata kunci: kritis, analisis wacana kritis, teks beritaABSTRACTParadigm or critical view considers that an individual is not considered a neutral subject who can interpret freely according to his mind because it is influenced by the social forces that exist in society. Language/text is a representation that plays a role in shaping a particular subject, a particular theme of discourse, as well as a strategy in it. Reproduction of reality in a text is basically strongly influenced by language, meaning symbolization, and political tagging. Social praxis requires meaning and meaning cannot be separated from language. Meaning can strengthen and influence everything that a person does, all social practices cannot be separated from the dimensions of discourse. Discourse analysis belongs to the category of critical paradigms. Therefore, the term critical discourse analysis is present to analyze the powers in the text. Critical discourse analysis is used to uncover the power that exists in each language process, the boundaries that are allowed to become discourse, the perspectives used, and the topics discussed, which in this study are news texts. Critical discourse analysis used refers to the Van Dijk model.