knee stiffness
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

102
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gastón Caracciolo ◽  
Roberto Yáñez ◽  
Rony Silvestre ◽  
Carlos De la Fuente ◽  
Héctor Zamorano ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The knee stiffness acquired following an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury might affect clinical knee tests, i.e., the pivot-shift maneuver. In contrast, the motor effects of spinal anesthesia could favor the identification of rotatory knee deficiencies prior to ACL reconstruction. Hence, we hypothesized that the intra-operative pivot-shift maneuver under spinal anesthesia generates more acceleration in the lateral tibial plateau of patients with an injured ACL than without. Methods Seventy patients with unilateral and acute ACL rupture (62 men and 8 women, IKDC of 55.1 ± 13.8 pts) were assessed using the pivot-shift maneuver before and after receiving spinal anesthesia. A triaxial accelerometer was attached to the skin between Gerdys’ tubercle and the anterior tuberosity to measure the subluxation and reduction phases. Mixed ANOVA and multiple comparisons were performed considering the anesthesia and leg as factors (alpha = 5%). Results We found a higher acceleration in the injured leg measured under anesthesia compared to without anesthesia (5.12 ± 1.56 m.s− 2 vs. 2.73 ± 1.19 m.s− 2, p < 0.001), and compared to the non-injured leg (5.12 ± 1.56 m.s− 2 vs. 3.45 ± 1.35 m.s− 2, p < 0.001). There was a presence of significant interaction between leg and anesthesia conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusions The pivot-shift maneuver performed under anesthesia identifies better rotatory instability than without anesthesia because testing the pivot-shift without anesthesia underestimates the rotatory subluxation of the knee by an increased knee stiffness. Thus, testing under anesthesia provides a unique opportunity to determine the rotational instability prior to ACL reconstruction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 53-55
Author(s):  
Musaab Mohamed Abdalla ◽  
Mohammed Elkhatim ◽  
Elhadi Abdelrahim

2021 ◽  
pp. 855-858
Author(s):  
Charalambos Panayiotou Charalambous

2021 ◽  
pp. 363-372
Author(s):  
Charalambos Panayiotou Charalambous
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110112
Author(s):  
John J. Davis ◽  
Allison H. Gruber

Background: The spring-like behavior of the leg and the joints of the lower body during running are thought to influence a wide range of physiologic and mechanical phenomena, including susceptibility to overuse injury. If leg and joint stiffness are associated with running-related injuries, altering joint or leg stiffness may be a useful avenue for injury rehabilitation and injury prevention programs. Purpose: To test the associations between running-related injury and leg stiffness, knee stiffness, and ankle stiffness in a prospective study of recreational runners. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 49 healthy recreational runners took part in a year-long study. Participants completed a 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic biomechanical assessment at baseline and reported training volume and injury status in a weekly survey during the follow-up period. Relationships between stiffness and injury were assessed at the level of individual legs (n = 98) using spline terms in Cox proportional hazards models. Results: During follow-up, 23 participants (29 legs) sustained injury. The median time to injury was 27 weeks (53.27 hours of training). Relative injury rate as a function of knee stiffness displayed a weak and nonsignificant U-shaped curve ( P = .187-.661); ankle and leg stiffness displayed no discernable associations with relative injury rate (leg stiffness, P = .215-.605; ankle stiffness, P = .419-.712). Conclusion: Leg and joint stiffness may not be important factors in the development of running-related injuries. Moderate changes in leg and joint stiffness are unlikely to substantially alter injury risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Alabi Ibrahim Abolaji

Background: The management of bone gap in the femoral shaft has remained difficult and challenging to the orthopaedic and trauma Surgeons. Distraction osteogenesis using the linear rail system (LRS) may be a useful tool in bridging such defects in our environment. Objective: To study the radiologic bone union, functional outcome and complications of distraction osteogenesis in the management of femoral bone gap using linear rail system (LRS). Methodology: A hospital based prospective interventional study conducted at National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dala and Albarka clinic, Dandishe, Kano, between March 2013 and March 2018. Sixty-eight cases were recruited. Every patient had LRS applied after adequate debridement when needed. Primary or interval corticotomy was done depending on the extent of soft tissue dissection in relation to the corticotomy site. Follow up was done until the regenerate had corticalized and LRS removed. Complications were noted and recorded. Radiologic union and functional outcome were assessed using the RUST and ASAMI outcome scores respectively. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: Sixty-eight cases were recruited with M: F ratio of 16: 1. The mean age was 36.7 +/- 10.5years. The age range between 36-45years was more commonly treated representing 34(50.0%). Primary corticotomy was done in 52 (76.5%) while interval corticotomy was done in 16 (23.5%). The mean regenerate length achieved was 9.6 +/- 2.7cm. The mean duration of treatment was 20.3 +/- 6 months. Radiologic union was achieved in 66 (97.1%) patients. Sixty-four (94.1%) had excellent or good ASAMI functional outcome scores. Sixty-six (97.1%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their treatment while 2 (2.9%) were indifferent. The common complications were intermittent pin tract infections recorded in 28 (41.2%), knee stiffness in 18 (26.5), proximal or distal varus deformity in 10 (14.7%) and non-union in 2 (2.9%) of cases. Conclusion: Distraction osteogenesis using LRS can achieve bone union and excellent outcome in the management of bone gap in the femur. However, intermittent pin tract infection, knee stiffness and varus deformities post significant challenges.


BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyong Ren ◽  
Kai Huang ◽  
Peijian Tong ◽  
Yansheng Zhu

Abstract Background Posttraumatic patella osteomyelitis is rare, and the treatment of osteomyelitis remains to be challenging. Control of the infection commonly costs a long time, and it is easily to cause knee stiffness. In addition, there is no unified protocol for the treatment of knee stiffness. Case presentation We reported a case of posttraumatic patella osteomyelitis that successive infected with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) after multiple surgeries. We successfully treated osteomyelitis by one-staged surgery, but the patient present knee stiffness after treatment. Thus Ilizarov external fixation system was further used to gradually adjust the mobility by exerting mechanical stress to the joint. After adjusting the frame under a scheduled plan, the patient successfully restored satisfactory knee function. Conclusions Adequate debridement is the key to control infections of posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Control the infection of posttraumatic patella osteomyelitis by one-staged surgery is achievable and could shorten the knee immobilization period. When knee stiffness occurs, scheduled range of motion (ROM) adjustment using Ilizarov frame with hinges might be a safe and useful method to restore function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document