antifungal antibiotic
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

328
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

38
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Yutian Shao ◽  
Eliza Molestak ◽  
Weike Su ◽  
Marek Stankevič ◽  
Marek Tchórzewski


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-04
Author(s):  
Dr. Sandhya Vaid ◽  

Cow is cited as Aditi (Mother of all Gods) in Ancient Hindi texts. In Artharaveda, Cow is said as adobe of 33Cr Hindu deities. Cow Urine (CU); the liquid metabolic excretion of Cow, is treated as sacred and pious in India. CU has diversified uses. It is used in raw and refined forms. Research reveals that CU distillate (CUD) is even more effective in therapeutic applications. CUD; Gomutra Ark or Kamdhenu Ark, was used since ancient times in Indian, Chinese and Egyptian civilizations. CU is also used in Myanmaar, Nepal, Nigeria and Zimbabwe as curator [1,2]. Variants of CU are also sold in departmental stores in America, Britain, Canada, Germany and India. Several Cow Urine Concoctions (CUC) serve as curative agents against deadly ailments. Being easily available, having long shelf life and economically cheaper; Gomutra variants are now becoming alternative medicines against innumerable diseases [3-6]. Biochemical composition of CU makes it perfect supplement against various disorders. CU of milking Cow contains 95% Water, 2.5% Urea and 2.5% Enzymes, Hormones, Minerals and Salts. pH of fresh CU ranges from 7.27 to 8.74. CU from a healthy Cow is pale yellow colored. Traces of Gold are found in CU of Gir Cows. Gold ions are generated when blood vessels of Cow hump comes in contact with sunrays. On an average about 18 Lit/Day of CU can be collected from an Indian Cow. Branded CUD can be easily obtained @ of Rs 250/500 ml in India. Advances on Gomutra are so prominent that America granted US Patent No: 6410059 and No: 6896907 for the medicinal ability of CU, especially as Anticancer, Antifungal, Antibiotic and Bioenhancer agent [16]. Present text is an overview of applications of Gomutra, particularly therapeutic applications.



2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 602-617
Author(s):  
Kangwen Xu ◽  
Danyu Shen ◽  
Nianda Yang ◽  
Shan‐Ho Chou ◽  
Mark Gomelsky ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Han ◽  
Mingming Yang ◽  
Alex M. Fulano ◽  
Long Lin ◽  
Shan-Ho Chou ◽  
...  

Abstract Small molecules are able to regulate numerous cellular processes through binding to various bacterial receptor proteins, but the mechanisms and functions by which these chemicals coordinate and execute remain poorly understood. 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA) and cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) are two such molecules with distinct structures that are produced in Lysobacter enzymogenes to synergistically affect the secretion of an antifungal antibiotic, known as heat-stable antifungal factor (HSAF). In our earlier studies, we showed that CdgL, a YajQ-like protein without DNA-binding domain, was able to physically interact with LysR, a transcription factor, to enhance its binding affinity toward the upstream region of the HSAF biosynthesis operon promoter, hence increasing the HSAF biosynthesis. Interestingly, 4-HBA or c-di-GMP can bind to its cognate receptor of LysR or CdgL, respectively, to regulate the HSAF biosynthesis. Further, c-di-GMP acts by binding to CdgL to induce the dissociation of the CdgL-LysR complex, leading to decreased downstream expression. We now showed that CdgL controlled the transcription of lenB2, which encodes an oxygenase to convert chorismate to 4-HBA. Notably, overexpression of cdgL was found to stimulate lenB2 transcription, which likely increased the intracellular 4-HBA content. Also, 4-HBA could bind to LysR to interrupt the LysR-CdgL complex formation and release of CdgL, which caused a lower affinity of LysR toward DNA and hence decreased HSAF operon expression. These findings, along with our earlier report, allow us to propose a coordination mechanism demonstrating how the HSAF biosynthesis is co-regulated by 4-HBA and c-di-GMP through interactions with their cognate receptors. This new mechanism shall shed light on improving the HSAF yield for practical usage.



2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-114
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Portnoi ◽  
M. B. Kobrin ◽  
S. A. Dovzhenko ◽  
A. N. Tevyashova ◽  
M. I. Treshchalin ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Han ◽  
Danyu Shen ◽  
Yu‐Chuan Wang ◽  
Shan‐Ho Chou ◽  
Mark Gomelsky ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
Akira Kitagawa ◽  
Tomoo Hosoe ◽  
Ken-ichi Kawai ◽  
Hiroyuki Kitagawa ◽  
Kiyoshi Kawai


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
W John Owen ◽  
Kevin G Meyer ◽  
Thomas J Slanec ◽  
Stacy T Meyer ◽  
Nick X Wang ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E.P. Yakovleva ◽  
V.A. Kolodyaznaya ◽  
O.V. Topkova


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document