Nonisothermal crystallization behaviors of ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer and ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer/chloroprene rubber thermoplastic vulcanizate

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer (EAA) and thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) based on EAA/chloroprene rubber (CR) were extensively studied using differential scanning calorimetry. Several methods, including the Avrami, Ozawa, and Mo equations, were carried out to analyze the process of nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of EAA and EAA/CR TPV. The results showed that the Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny and a method developed by Mo could describe the nonisothermal crystallizations of pure EAA and the EAA/CR TPV very well. However, the Ozawa analysis did not give an adequate description. The crystallization processes of pure EAA and the EAA/CR TPV were accelerated by increasing the cooling rates. Moreover, the initial crystallization temperature and the crystallization termination temperature of EAA/CR TPV were higher than those of pure EAA at the same cooling rate, thus showing the nucleating function of CR in the beginning. While the crystallization half time of EAA/CR TPV was apparently longer than that of pure EAA, meaning that the more CR could cause the steric effect and retard the crystallization process of the TPV during the late stages of crystallizing. Although the CR phase of EAA/CR TPV could provide more nucleation sites, the presence of more CR phase must impose a much more significant confinement effect on the crystal growth of EAA. It was believed that this confinement effect overweighed the nucleation effect, thereby slowing down the overall crystallization rate.