Superior Colliculus Neurons Use Distinct Operational Modes in the Integration of Multisensory Stimuli

Many neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) integrate sensory information from multiple modalities, giving rise to significant response enhancements. Although enhanced multisensory responses have been shown to depend on the spatial and temporal relationships of the stimuli as well as on their relative effectiveness, these factors alone do not appear sufficient to account for the substantial heterogeneity in the magnitude of the multisensory products that have been observed. Toward this end, the present experiments have revealed that there are substantial differences in the operations used by different multisensory SC neurons to integrate their cross-modal inputs, suggesting that intrinsic differences in these neurons may also play an important deterministic role in multisensory integration. In addition, the integrative operation employed by a given neuron was found to be well correlated with the neuron's dynamic range. In total, four categories of SC neurons were identified based on how their multisensory responses changed relative to the predicted addition of the two unisensory inputs as stimulus effectiveness was altered. Despite the presence of these categories, a general rule was that the most robust multisensory enhancements were seen with combinations of the least effective unisensory stimuli. Together, these results provide a better quantitative picture of the integrative operations performed by multisensory SC neurons and suggest mechanistic differences in the way in which these neurons synthesize cross-modal information.

Neuron-Specific Response Characteristics Predict the Magnitude of Multisensory Integration

Multisensory neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) typically respond to combinations of stimuli from multiple modalities with enhancements and/or depressions in their activity. Although such changes in response have been shown to follow a predictive set of integrative principles, these principles fail to completely account for the full range of interactions seen throughout the SC population. In an effort to better define this variability, we sought to determine if there were additional features of the neuronal response profile that were predictive of the magnitude of the multisensory interaction. To do this, we recorded from 109 visual-auditory SC neurons while systematically manipulating stimulus intensity. Along with the previously described roles of space, time, and stimulus effectiveness, two features of a neuron's response profile were found to offer predictive value as to the magnitude of the multisensory interaction: spontaneous activity and the level of sensory responsiveness. Multisensory neurons with little or no spontaneous activity and weak sensory responses had the capacity to exhibit large response enhancements. Conversely, neurons with modest spontaneous activity and robust sensory responses exhibited relatively small response enhancements. Together, these results provide a better view into multisensory integration, and suggest substantial heterogeneity in the integrative characteristics of the multisensory SC population.

Two Corticotectal Areas Facilitate Multisensory Orientation Behavior

It had previously been shown that influences from two cortical areas, the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) and the rostral lateral suprasylvian sulcus (rLS), play critical roles in rendering superior colliculus (SC) neurons capable of synthesizing their cross-modal inputs. The present studies examined the consequences of selectively eliminating these cortical influences on SC-mediated orientation responses to cross-modal stimuli. Cats were trained to orient to a low-intensity modality-specific cue (visual) in the presence or absence of a neutral cue from another modality (auditory). The visual target could appear at various locations within 45° of the midline, and the stimulus effectiveness was varied to yield an average of correct orientation responses of approximately 45%. Response enhancement and depression were observed when the auditory cue was coupled with the target stimulus: A substantially enhanced probability in correct responses was evident when the cross-modal stimuli were spatially coincident, and a substantially decreased response probability was obtained when the stimuli were spatially disparate. Cryogenic blockade of either AES or rLS disrupted these behavioral effects, thereby eliminating the enhanced performance in response to spatially coincident cross-modal cues and degrading the depressed performance in response to spatially disparate cross-modal cues. These disruptive effects on targets contralateral to the deactivated cortex were restricted to multisensory interactive processes. Orientation to modality-specific targets was unchanged. Furthermore, the pattern of orientation errors was unaffected by cortical deactivation. These data bear striking similarities to the effects of AES and rLS deactivation on multisensory integration at the level of individual SC neurons. Presumably, eliminating the critical influences from AES or rLS cortex disrupts SC multisensory synthesis that, in turn, disables SC-mediated multisensory orientation behaviors.

Pontine Gustatory Activity Is Altered by Electrical Stimulation in the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala

Visceral signals and experience modulate the responses of brain stem neurons to gustatory stimuli. Both behavioral and anatomical evidence suggests that this modulation may involve descending input from the forebrain. The present study investigates the centrifugal control of gustatory neural activity in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN). Extracellular responses were recorded from 51 single PBN neurons during application of sucrose, NaCl, NaCl mixed with amiloride, citric acid, and QHCl with or without concurrent electrical stimulation in the ipsilateral central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA). Based on the sapid stimulus that evoked the greatest discharge, 3 neurons were classified as sucrose-best, 32 as NaCl-best, and 16 as citric acid-best. In most of the neurons sampled, response rates to an effective stimulus were either inhibited or unchanged during electrical stimulation of the CeA. Stimulation in the CeA was without effect in two sucrose-best neurons, nine NaCl-best neurons, and one citric acid-best neuron. Suppression was evident in 1 sucrose-best neuron, 18 NaCl-best neurons, and 15 citric acid-best neurons. In NaCl-best neurons inhibited by CeA stimulation, the magnitude of the effect was similar for spontaneous activity and responses to the five taste stimuli. Nonetheless, the inhibitory modulation of gustatory sensitivity increased the relative effectiveness of NaCl resulting in narrower chemical selectivity. For citric acid–best neurons, the magnitude of inhibition produced by CeA activation increased with an increase in stimulus effectiveness. The responses to citric acid were inhibited significantly more than the responses to all other stimuli with the exception of NaCl mixed with amiloride. The overall effect was to change these CA-best neurons to CA/NaCl-best neurons. In a smaller subset of NaCl-best neurons ( n = 5), CeA stimulation augmented the responsiveness to NaCl but was without effect on the other stimuli or on baseline activity. It appears that electrical stimulation in the CeA modulates response intensity, as well as the type of gustatory information that is transmitted in a subset of NaCl-best neurons. These findings provide an additional link between the amygdala and the PBN in the control of NaCl intake, modulating the response and the chemical selectivity of an amiloride-sensitive Na+-detecting input pathway.