hemodynamic therapy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

71
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Mohammed Salah Hussein ◽  
Sarah Jamal Almujil ◽  
Ahmed Saeed S. Banheem ◽  
Nasser Naif Alsuhaymi ◽  
Mansour Hemaid Alhelali ◽  
...  

Cardiac cirrhosis (congestive hepatopathy) refers to a group of hepatic abnormalities that develop as a result of right-sided heart failure.  Cirrhosis of the liver can be induced by any right-sided pathology that leads to right-sided heart failure, which leads to increased venous congestion and pressure in the hepatic sinusoids. Because cardiac cirrhosis might be asymptomatic or diagnosed incorrectly due to other types of liver disease, determining its prevalence is difficult. The underlying heart disease, rather than the hepatic congestion and damage, is usually the cause of death in cardiac cirrhosis. The control of the underlying cardiac disease, as well as the optimization of cardiac output, are the mainstays of congestive hepatopathy treatment. Diuresis can help with hepatic congestion, but it must be used with caution to avoid causing hepatic ischemia. Hemodynamic therapy may be able to reverse the early stages of congestive hepatitis. The widespread use of heart transplantation (HT) and considerable breakthroughs in medical and surgical treatments have drastically altered the profile of CH patients. In this overview we will be looking at the disease cause, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Anetsberger ◽  
Bettina Jungwirth ◽  
Manfred Blobner ◽  
Florian Ringel ◽  
Isabell Bernlochner ◽  
...  

AbstractTroponinT levels are frequently elevated after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, their clinical impact on long term outcomes still remains unclear. This study evaluates the association of TroponinT and functional outcomes 3 months after SAH. Data were obtained in the frame of a randomized controlled trial exploring the association of Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy and outcomes after SAH (NCT01832389). TroponinT was measured daily for the first 14 days after admission or until discharge from the ICU. Outcome was assessed using Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 3 months after discharge. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between initial TroponinT values stratified by tertiles and admission as well as outcome parameters. TroponinT measurements were analyzed in 105 patients. TroponinT values at admission were associated with outcome assessed by GOS in a univariate analysis. TroponinT was not predictive of vasospasm or delayed cerebral ischemia, but an association with pulmonary and cardiac complications was observed. After adjustment for age, history of arterial hypertension and World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade, TroponinT levels at admission were not independently associated with worse outcome (GOS 1–3) or death at 3 months. In summary, TroponinT levels at admission are associated with 3 months-GOS but have limited ability to independently predict outcome after SAH.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Emmanouil Stamatakis ◽  
Guram Devadze ◽  
Sofia Hadzilia ◽  
Dimitrios Valsamidis

Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy is a protocolized treatment strategy aimed at optimization of global cardiovascular dynamics, including oxygen delivery to tissues and organ perfusion pressure. This is achieved by titrating fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes to predefined physiological target values of hemodynamic variables. Its scope is to reduce complications (acute kidney disease, pulmonary oedema, respiratory distress syndrome, wound infections), decrease major abdominal and systemic postoperative complications, length of stay and postoperative morbidity and mortality mainly in high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. Identifying patients in whom perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy can actually improve postoperative outcomes is crucial. This is a review focusing on all the aspects of GDFT compared to standard fluid therapy during surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani Nasser Abdelhamid

: Beyond being an excellent protective material for bioentities, zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8) have advanced several applications, including biomedical applications. The straightforward synthesis of ZIF-8 at mild conditions improved the biomineralization of several biomolecules, e.g., protein, peptides, carbohydrate, and biological cells, such as viruses and bacterial cells. Bioinspiration of ZIF-8 enhanced and improved the material's applications for biomedicine. This review article summarized the recent achievements of ZIF-8 for biomedical applications, such as cancer therapy, antimicrobial, biosensing, and biocatalysis. ZIF8-based materials advanced cancer therapy via drug delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs, photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), hemodynamic therapy (CDT), gene therapy, and starvation therapy. Antibacterial agent encapsulated ZIF-8 exhibited superior biological activity compared to the free antibacterial agents. ZIF-8 based materials enhanced the selectivity and sensitivity for analytes' biosensing, ensuring their potential for electronic devices. Biocatalysis of enzyme encapsulated ZIF-8 offered high catalytic performance with robust properties for recycling. ZIF-8 acts as a protective host for enzymes, proteins, and drugs from degradation induced due to temperature, solvents, and proteolytic agents. The first part of the review discussed the structure, chemistry, and bioinspiration of ZIF-8. The second part reviewed the biomedical applications of ZIF-8. The potential risks and current challenges of using ZIF-8 for biomedical applications were also reviewed.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Huang ◽  
Da-Wei Liu ◽  
Xiao-Ting Wang
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. McEvoy ◽  
Jonathan P. Wanderer ◽  
Yaping Shi ◽  
Krishnan S. Ramanujan ◽  
Timothy M. Geiger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recent literature has demonstrated that hemodynamic instability in the intraoperative period places patients at risk of poor outcomes. Furthermore, recent studies have reported that stroke volume optimization and protocolized hemodynamic management may improve perioperative outcomes, especially surgical site infection (SSI), in certain high-risk populations. However, the optimal strategy for intraoperative management of all elective patients within an enhanced recovery program remains to be elucidated. Methods We performed a pre-post quasi-experimental study to assess the effect of adding goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to an enhanced recovery program (ERP) for colorectal surgery on SSI and other outcomes. Three groups were compared: “Pre-ERP,” defined as historical control (before enhanced recovery program); “ERP,” defined as enhanced recovery program using zero fluid balance; and “ERP+GDHT,” defined as enhanced recovery program plus goal-directed hemodynamic therapy. Outcomes were obtained through our National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participation. Results A total of 623 patients were included in the final analysis (Pre-ERP = 246, ERP = 140, and ERP + GDHT = 237). Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were balanced between groups. We did not observe statistically significant differences in SSI or composite complication rates in unadjusted or adjusted analysis. There was no evidence of association between study group and 30-day readmission. American Society of Anesthesiologists status ≥ 3 and open surgical approach were significantly associated with increased risk of SSI, composite complication, and 30-day readmission (p < 0.05 for all) in all groups. Conclusions There was no evidence that addition of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy for all patients in an enhanced recovery program for colorectal surgery affects the risk of SSI, composite complications, or 30-day readmission. Further research is needed to investigate whether there is benefit of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy for select high-risk populations. Trial registration NCT03189550. Registered 16 June 2017–Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT03189550&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pin-Hsin Chen ◽  
Fon-Yih Tsuang ◽  
Chen-Tse Lee ◽  
Yu-Chang Yeh ◽  
Hsiao-Liang Cheng ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundDespite dexmedetomidine may be neuroprotective in patients undergoing cranial surgery by inhibiting neuroinflammation; however, it reduces cardiac output and cerebral blood flow. We proposed that dexmedetomidine infusion combined with goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) could improve cranial surgery neurological outcomes without hemodynamic perturbation.MethodsA randomized, double-blind trial was conducted. One hundred sixty adult patients undergoing elective cranial surgery received either dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg kg−1 h−1) or saline during surgery. The goal-directed hemodynamic therapy was used for stroke volume optimization. The proportion of patients who developed postoperative new neurological deficits was compared. The severities of new neurological deficit were assessed by using in-hospital Barthel index changes and the 30-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Postoperative delirium was identified using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICSDC) criteria. The level of a perioperative serum neuroinflammatory mediator, high motility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), was compared.ResultsThe dexmedetomidine group exhibited a lower cardiac index than did the control group (3.0 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 1.8 L min−1 m−2; p = 0.0482) without lactate accumulation. Fewer patients in the dexmedetomidine group developed new postoperative deficits (26.3% versus 43.8%; p = 0.031) but numbers of patients remained symptomatic neurological deficit before discharge were comparable between the two groups (23.8% vs. 38.8%; p= 0.060). In addition, an attenuated Barthel index decline (−6.3 ± 20.4 vs. −13.6 ± 24.8; p = 0.043), a more favorable 30-day mRS profile (p = 0.013), and a higher incidence of postoperative delirium-free (ICDSC scored 0: 84.6% versus 64.2%; p = 0.012) were observed in the dexmedetomidine group. Furthermore, dexmedetomidine induced a significant decline in perioperative serum HMGB1 level (222.5 ± 408.3 vs. 152.2 ± 280.0 ng mL−1; p = 0.0033).ConclusionsDexmedetomidine infusion combined with GDHT mitigates neuroinflammation during cranial surgery without hemodynamic perturbation, thus achieving neuroprotective effects.Clinical Trial RegistrationProspectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov. (identifier NCT02878707, date of registration: August 25, 2016)


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Pan ◽  
Longxiang Su ◽  
Dawei Liu ◽  
Xiaoting Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document