scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty Versus Supramalleolar Osteotomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongyu Yang ◽  
Liang Cui ◽  
Shiwu Tao ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Fengqi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Patients ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Distraction Arthroplasty ◽  
Supramalleolar Osteotomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Traumatic ◽  
Improved Function ◽  
Surface Angle

Abstract BackgroundPost-traumatic ankle arthritis is increasing in young people and it is very important to preserve the ankle range of motion in young patients. This study aimed to compare ankle distraction arthroplasty versus supramalleolar osteotomy for post-traumatic ankle arthritis.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed 32 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for post-traumatic ankle arthritis from January 2015 to December 2018 after failure of conservative treatment. Thirteen ankles that underwent ankle distraction arthroplasty were age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched with 19 ankles that underwent supramalleolar osteotomy. Patients returned for clinical and radiologic follow-up at an average of 32 (range, 24–48) months postoperatively. Outcomes were the comparison of the pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, complications, subjective patient-rated satisfaction, and ankle function.ResultsThe VAS and AOFAS scores of the two groups were significantly improved at final follow-up compared with preoperatively (p<0.05), but did not significantly differ between groups. The ankle distraction arthroplasty group had better postoperative ankle mobility than the supramalleolar osteotomy group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the tibial anterior surface angle, talar tilt angle, tibial lateral surface angle, and other imaging parameters, but supramalleolar osteotomy was more effective in correcting the load-bearing line of the ankle and hindfoot. The complication rate was similar in both groupsConclusionsAnkle distraction arthroplasty and supramalleolar osteotomy both achieved good pain relief and improved function in patients with traumatic ankle arthritis.Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

scholarly journals Supramalleolar Osteotomy combined with Intra-articular Osteotomy for the Reconstruction of Malunited Supination-Adduction Ankle Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Guo Changjun ◽  
Xiangyang Xu
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Supramalleolar Osteotomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Effective Option ◽  
Vertical Impaction ◽  
Control Study

Category: Ankle Arthritis, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The supination-adduction ankle fractures often showed vertical impaction of the tibial medial plafond. The malunion of these fractures cause the varus ankle deformity and secondary ankle arthritis. This retrospective control study looked at the use of supramalleolar osteotomy combined with intra-articular osteotomy in patients with malunited supination- adduction ankle fractures. Methods: Twelve patients were treated with malunited supination-adduction ankle fractures between January 2013 and December 2014. All of these patients had the varus ankle deformity and secondary ankle arthritis. Supramalleolar osteotomy combined with intra-articular osteotomy were underwent for the reconstruction surgery. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain during daily activities, Olerud and Molander Scale scores, subjective satisfaction survey rating and the modified Takakura classification stage were obtained. Ten patients were available for follow-up at a mean of 35.4 months (range, 28 to 40 months). Results: Average postoperative Olerud and Molander Scale score 24 months after surgery was 83±10 compared with 60±14 preoperatively. The mean VAS score decreased from 7±2 preoperatively to 2±2 at the latest follow-up. Six patients rated their result as excellent, 3 as good and 1 as fair. No significant difference in the modified Takakura classification stage was observed between the preoperative and the last follow-up. Conclusion: The use of supramalleolar osteotomy combined with intra-articular osteotomy was an effective option for the treatment of malunited supination-adduction ankle fractures.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee for Adults 40 Years and Older

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711880544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon E. Anderson ◽  
Katlyn S. Robinson ◽  
Jack Wiedrick ◽  
Dennis C. Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Model ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Growth Curves ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has become a standard therapy for cartilage restoration in young patients. Purpose: To determine the efficacy of fresh OCA transplantation for focal cartilage lesions in patients aged ≥40 years compared with a group of patients aged ≤39 years. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A database was used to identify patients who underwent fresh OCA transplantation in the knee in a single-surgeon practice over a 10-year period and who completed baseline patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC); Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Quality of Life (QOL), and Sports & Recreation; and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). Patients who completed the same PRO measures at a minimum 12-month follow-up were categorized into 2 groups based on age at surgery and were observed longitudinally. Mixed-model regression was used to predict longitudinal growth curves for each PRO score while controlling for confounding patient and surgical variables. Results: The study group consisted of 38 patients with a mean age of 52.32 years (range, 40-69 years) and mean final follow-up of 44.47 ± 24.32 months. The control group consisted of 42 patients with a mean age of 27.19 years (range, 15-39 years) and mean final follow-up of 33.75 ± 19.53 months. A statistically significant improvement from baseline to final follow-up was seen for the IKDC score and all 5 KOOS subscores in both the study and the control groups ( P < .01 in 10 of 12 comparisons and P < .05 for the other 2 comparisons). Maximum improvements were seen in the KOOS QOL and Sports & Recreation subscores for both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the change from baseline to final follow-up or in differences at any time point in model-based longitudinal projections for any PRO score through 5 years. Conclusion: There was a significant improvement of outcomes for both groups, with no statistically significant difference between groups over longitudinal follow-up. The efficacy of fresh OCA transplantation in adults aged ≥40 years with a focal chondral lesion and without osteoarthritis is similar to that of younger adults, and benefits are greatest for the KOOS QOL and Sports & Recreation subscales, which reflect functional outcomes.

Comparison of Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Patients Younger and Older Than 55 Years

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 762-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gun-Woo Lee ◽  
Jong‑Keun Seon ◽  
Nack-Sung Kim ◽  
Keun-Bae Lee
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Background: Total ankle arthroplasty is often not recommended to younger patients with ankle arthritis because of their high functional demands. The purpose of this study was to compare intermediate-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survivorship rates of total ankle arthroplasty between patients younger and older than 55 years. Methods: A total of 117 consecutive patients (123 ankles) who underwent primary total ankle arthroplasty using Hintegra prosthesis with a mean follow-up of 78 months were enrolled and divided into 2 age groups: under 55 years (38 ankles; mean age 45 years) and over 55 years (85 ankles; mean age 65 years). Results: Clinical scores of Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale pain and disability, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot, Short Form–36 Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary, and visual analog scale were not significantly different between the 2 age groups at the final follow-up ( P > .05). There were no significant differences in complications and survivorship rates between the two at a mean follow-up of 78 months ( P > .05). Conclusions: Clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates of total ankle arthroplasty in patients under age of 55 years were satisfactory and comparable to those in patients older than 55 years in the intermediate-term follow-up. Therefore, total ankle arthroplasty may be considered as a viable treatment option in young patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative series, therapeutic.

Repositional Subtalar Arthrodesis Combined With Supramalleolar Osteotomy for Late-Stage Varus Ankle Arthritis With Hindfoot Valgus

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110366
Author(s):  
Chul Hyun Park ◽  
Jaeyoung Kim ◽  
Ji Beom Kim ◽  
Woo-Chun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Late Stage ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Subtalar Arthrodesis ◽  
Supramalleolar Osteotomy ◽  
Directional Motion ◽  
Foot Function

Background: Late-stage varus ankle arthritis is thought to be associated with varus of the tibial plafond and hindfoot. However, some late-stage varus arthritis show hindfoot valgus, which can be explained by subtalar subluxation with opposite directional motion between the talus and calcaneus. We hypothesized that late-stage varus ankle arthritis with hindfoot valgus could improve with repositional subtalar arthrodesis and supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of the repositional subtalar arthrodesis combined with SMO for late-stage varus ankle arthritis with hindfoot valgus. Methods: This study includes 16 consecutive patients (16 ankles) with late-stage varus ankle arthritis of Takakura stage 3-b and hindfoot valgus who were treated using repositional subtalar arthrodesis combined with SMO and followed for a minimum of 2 years. Clinical results were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Foot Function Index (FFI). Radiographic results were assessed with standard parameters measured on weightbearing foot and ankle radiographs. Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Results: VAS and FFI significantly improved after surgery. Mean talar tilt angle improved from 12.8 ± 2.8 degrees to 3.9 ± 3.1 degrees ( P < .001). Talus center migration and Meary angle significantly improved after surgery. Medial distal tibial angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, hindfoot moment arm, and talonavicular coverage angle significantly changed after surgery. Radiographic stage improved in 15 ankles (93.8%) after surgery. Conclusion: In this series with minimum 2-year follow-up, we found that late-stage (Takakura stage 3-b) varus ankle arthritis with hindfoot valgus clinically and radiographically improved with repositional subtalar arthrodesis combined with SMO. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic.

scholarly journals Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome with and without Central TFC Lesion

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Herold ◽  
Frank Unglaub ◽  
Kai Megerle ◽  
Holger Erne ◽  
Steffen Löw
Keyword(s):  
Wrist Pain ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy ◽  
Ulnar Impaction ◽  
Shortening Osteotomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage ◽  
Improved Function ◽  
Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Background Arthroscopic debridement of the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) is well accepted in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome with central TFC lesions. Treatment remains controversial, however, when there is no such lesion from radiocarpal view. Purpose This study assessed the clinical outcome of arthroscopic central TFC resection and debridement and secondary ulnar shortening in patients with ulnar impaction with central TFC lesion compared with patients without TFC lesion. Patients and Methods Thirty-two consecutive patients with ulnar impaction syndrome were arthroscopically treated, 16 of whom had a central lesion of the TFC that was debrided. In the 16 patients with no lesion from the radiocarpal view, the TFC was centrally resected and debrided to decompress the ulnocarpal joint. Persisting symptoms necessitated ulnar shortening in four patients in each group. Two patients underwent repeat arthroscopic TFC debridement. All patients were examined at 3, 6, and 12 months, and at final follow-up (mean: 1.7 years) following arthroscopy, respectively ulnar shortening or hardware removal. Results In both groups, pain, Krimmer, and DASH scores significantly improved. Improvements of DASH scores were significantly higher in patients without lesion at 12 months and at final follow-up. For other parameters, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion In both situations, with and without central TFC lesion, resection and debridement sufficiently reduced the ulnar-sided wrist pain and improved function in three out of four patients, and therefore qualified as the first-line treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome as arthroscopy is performed, anyway. Those patients who complained of persisting or recurrent ulnar-sided wrist pain finally benefitted from ulnar shortening osteotomy as the secondary procedure. Level of Evidence Therapeutic III, case–control study.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy Combined With an Intra-articular Osteotomy for the Reconstruction of Malunited Medial Impacted Ankle Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1457-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changjun Guo ◽  
Zongbao Liu ◽  
Yangbo Xu ◽  
Xingchen Li ◽  
Yuan Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Supramalleolar Osteotomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: Malunion of a medial impacted ankle fracture may cause varus ankle deformity. This retrospective study examined the use of supramalleolar osteotomy combined with an intra-articular osteotomy in patients with malunited medial impacted ankle fractures. Methods: Twenty-four patients with malunited medial impacted ankle fracture were treated between January 2011 and December 2014. Using Weber’s classification, 10 had type A fractures and 14 had type B, and with the AO classification, 20 had 44A2 and 4 had 44B3. All of these patients had varus ankle deformity. Supramalleolar osteotomy combined with an intra-articular osteotomy was performed. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during daily activities, the Olerud and Molander Scale and the modified Takakura classification stage were used to determine the clinical outcomes and a radiographic analysis was performed. Results: The radiographic parameters, including the tibial ankle surface (TAS) angle and talar tilt angle (TTA), showed significant differences between the preoperative and follow-up assessments. The mean tibial lateral surface (TLS) did not show a significant change. The average Olerud and Molander Scale score improved significantly from 56.4 ± 6.21 preoperatively to 77.0 ± 6.11 at the latest follow-up ( P < .01). The mean VAS decreased significantly from 6.7 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 3.1 ± 0.6 at the latest follow-up ( P < .01). No significant difference in the modified Takakura classification stage was observed between the preoperative assessment and the last follow-up. Conclusions: The use of a supramalleolar osteotomy combined with an intra-articular osteotomy was an effective option for the treatment of malunited medial impacted ankle fractures associated with varus ankle deformity. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Combining Microfractures, Autologous Bone Graft, and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for the Treatment of Juvenile Osteochondral Talar Lesions

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 485-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo D’Ambrosi ◽  
Camilla Maccario ◽  
Chiara Ursino ◽  
Nicola Serra ◽  
Federico Giuseppe Usuelli
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Osteochondral Lesion ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Autologous Bone Graft ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Autologous Bone

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients younger than 20 years, treated with the arthroscopic-talus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AT-AMIC) technique and autologous bone graft for osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). Methods: Eleven patients under 20 years (range 13.3-20.0) underwent the AT-AMIC procedure and autologous bone graft for OLTs. Patients were evaluated preoperatively (T0) and at 6 (T1), 12 (T2), and 24 (T3) months postoperatively, using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle and Hindfoot (AOFAS) score, the visual analog scale and the SF-12 respectively in its Mental and Physical Component Scores. Radiologic assessment included computed tomographic (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative measurement of the lesion. A multivariate statistical analysis was performed. Results: Mean lesion size measured during surgery was 1.1 cm3 ± 0.5 cm3. We found a significant difference in clinical and radiologic parameters with analysis of variance for repeated measures ( P < .001). All clinical scores significantly improved ( P < .05) from T0 to T3. Lesion area significantly reduced from 119.1 ± 29.1 mm2 preoperatively to 77.9 ± 15.8 mm2 ( P < .05) at final follow-up as assessed by CT, and from 132.2 ± 31.3 mm2 to 85.3 ± 14.5 mm2 ( P < .05) as assessed by MRI. Moreover, we noted an important correlation between intraoperative size of the lesion and body mass index (BMI) ( P = .011). Conclusions: The technique can be considered safe and effective with early good results in young patients. Moreover, we demonstrated a significant correlation between BMI and lesion size and a significant impact of OLTs on quality of life. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Six-month outcomes of a high intensity exercise programme in young patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The SAFE-HCM trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Basu ◽  
S Jayakumar ◽  
C Miles ◽  
G Parry-Williams ◽  
H Maclachlan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Exercise Adherence ◽  
Exercise Programme ◽  
Exercise Group ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Psychological Benefits ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Cardiac Risk in the Young Background Moderate intensity exercise training in older patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) can improve functional capacity, without significant harm. However, younger patients are attracted to high intensity training (HIT) regimes. The SAFE-HCM study demonstrated that an individually tailored, HIT programme in young patients with HCM was feasible, and provided both health and psychological benefits, without an increase in the burden of arrhythmia. Purpose To assess whether observed benefits of a HIT programme in young patients with HCM are sustained at 6 months. Methods Eighty patients with HCM (45.7y+/-8.6) underwent baseline clinical and psychological assessment. Individuals were randomised to a 12-week HIT programme (n = 40) or usual care (n = 40). Baseline evaluation was repeated at 12 weeks (T12). Feasibility, safety, health and psychological benefits were assessed. At 12-weeks individuals were encouraged to continue with the frequency and intensity of physical activity (PA) achieved at the end of the cardiac rehabilitation programme. Participants in the exercise arm were invited to follow-up at 6 months (T6m). Results The majority (83%) of participants completed the 12-week study. At T12 there was no significant difference between groups in the composite arrhythmia safety outcome (p = 0.99). The indices of exercise capacity were significantly improved in the exercise compared to the control group; peak VO2 (+3.7ml/kg/min [CI 1.1,6.3], p = 0.006), VO2/kg at anaerobic threshold (VO2/kgAT) (+2.44ml/kg/min [CI 0.6,4.2], p = 0.009), time to AT (+115s [CI 54.3,175.9], p &lt; 0.001) and exercise time (max ET) (+108s [CI 33.7,182.2], p = 0.005). The exercise group also demonstrated greater reduction in systolic BP (-7.3mmHg [CI -11.7,-2.8], p = 0.002), BMI (-0.8kg/m2 [CI-1.1,-0.4], p &lt; 0.001), anxiety (-2.6 [CI-3.6,-1.6], p= &lt;0.001) and depression (-1.1 [CI -2.0,-0.2], p = 0.015) scores. At T6m patient reported exercise adherence was comparable to baseline PA in 33/34 of the exercise group attending for follow up. Most exercise gains dissipated with the exception of time to AT (p = 0.002), max ET (p = 0.003), VO2/kgAT (p = 0.04) and anxiety score (p &lt; 0.001) (Figure 1). There were no sustained episodes of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. The incidence of NSVT did not differ between time points (p = 0.09). Conclusion A 12-week HIT programme in young patients with HCM offers considerable gains in fitness and psychological outcomes, with no increase in arrhythmic burden. At T6m exercise levels as well as most physiological adaptations and health benefits returned to baseline, as seen in other studies when formal participation in an exercise programme comes to an end. This highlights the importance of the implementation of strategies to encourage ongoing engagement in PA. Potential solutions include identification of barriers to exercise, as well as adoption of novel tele-rehabilation approaches. Abstract Figure 1 Sustained benefits at T6m

A Prospective Comparison of 3 Hamstring ACL Fixation Devices - Rigidfix, BioScrew and Intrafix - Randomized Into 4 Groups with a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Metso ◽  
Ville Bister ◽  
Arsi Harilainen ◽  
Jerker Sandelin
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: This is a five years follow-up report of some of the new devices for graft fixation. A two years follow-up data was published previously. As there were no statistically or clinically relevant differences in the results two years postoperatively, we hypothesize that after five years of follow-up there is no difference in the outcome after either cross-pin or absorbable interference screw fixation in ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts.Methods: 120 patients were randomized into four different groups (30 each) for ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons: group I femoral Rigidfix cross-pin and Intrafix tibial extension sheath with a tapered expansion screw; group II Rigidfix femoral and BioScrew interference screw tibial fixation; group III BioScrew femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation; group IV BioScrew fixation into both tunnels. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores, and instrumented laxity measurements. Results: In this 5 years follow-up there were 102/120 (85%) patients available, but only 77 (64,2%) attended the clinical examinations. No significant difference between the groups in the clinical results was detected. There was a significant difference in additional procedures between the 2 and 5 years follow-up, group I had six additional procedures between the 2 and 5 years follow-up (P=.041). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in the additional procedures, most in group I (six). None of these procedures found problems with the ACL graft. Other statistically or clinically significant differences in the 5 years follow-up results were not found. Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.Trial registration: ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN34011837. Retrospectively registered 17.4.2020.

scholarly journals Direct Comparison of Modified Jobe and Docking Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction at Midterm Follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Edward S. Chang ◽  
Stephen Bayer ◽  
James P. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Shoulder Injuries ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The modified Jobe and docking techniques are the 2 most commonly employed techniques for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction among overhead athletes. However, no study has directly compared these techniques performed by a single surgeon. Current comparisons of these techniques have relied solely on systematic reviews and biomechanical studies. Hypothesis: There will be no difference in outcomes or return to play between the modified Jobe and docking techniques in elbow UCL reconstruction surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Twenty-five modified Jobe and 26 docking UCL-reconstructive surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon, each with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score, Conway Scale, years played, sex, handedness, sport, position, palmaris versus gracilis graft type, concomitant or future arm/shoulder injuries, and need for additional surgery were compared between the groups. Patients who underwent future shoulder or elbow surgery, no matter the cause, were included. Results: No difference was seen between the modified Jobe and docking reconstruction cases in regard to KJOC scores (mean ± SD: 78.4 ± 19.5 vs 72.0 ± 26.0, P = .44), Conway Scale (return to play, any level: 84% vs 82%, P = .61), years played (14.7 ± 6.2 vs 15.2 ± 5.8, P = .52), sex ( P = .67), handedness ( P ≥ .999), sport ( P = .44), position ( P = .60), level of competition ( P = .59), and future surgery (12% vs 4%, P = .35). Palmaris graft type had significantly higher KJOC scores than hamstring grafts (82.3 ± 20.0 vs 57.9 ± 21.2, P = .001). The mean follow-up was 6.1 years in the modified Jobe group and 7.3 years in the docking group (mean = 6.7, P = .47). Conclusion: The modified Jobe and docking techniques are both suitable surgical options for elbow UCL reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference between the techniques in regard to return to play, KJOC score, or need for subsequent surgery at 6.7-year follow-up. This is the first direct clinical comparison of these 2 techniques by a single surgeon at midterm follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document