Fanci-FANCD2 Promotes Genome Stability and DNA Repair By Down-Regulating BLM Helicase Activity

Background: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disease characterized by bone marrow failure, developmental defects, and higher risk of cancer. Mutations in FA genes have been detected commonly in a large swath of cancers. In the FA DNA repair pathway, DNA damage induces the mono-ubiquitination of the FANCI-FANCD2 (ID2) heterodimer and this regulation licenses the execution of downstream DNA damage signaling and repair steps. In response to replication stress, FANCD2 also prevents replication fork collapse during S phase. Bloom syndrome (BS) is also a genomic instability disease, characterized by growth abnormalities and cancer predisposition. The single BS protein, BLM helicase, participates in DNA repair by promoting DNA end resection and double Holliday junction dissolution. It has been shown that BLM is involved in restart of stalled replication fork. FA and BS have functional interactions. In tumor DNA sequencing of the Yale Precision Tumor board, we identified a somatic 6 amino acid deletion in FANCD2 in a head and neck tumor, while a germline point mutation was found on the other allele. We have identified a FANCD2-L822A mutant with defective BLM binding, which was used to further investigate the role of FANCD2-BLM interaction in genome stability and DNA repair. Methods: Highly purified proteins were used to investigate how ID2 affects helicase and DNA end resection activity of the BLM complex. HeLa, FANCD2-deficient, and FANCD2 corrected fibroblast cell lines were used to examine pRPA2 and RAD51 foci formation. We also used DNA fiber assay to detect end resection and isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND) assay to examine the RAD51 recruitment on replication fork. Results: A somatic 6 amino acid deletion (p819-824) in FANCD2 was identified in a head and neck tumor. FA-D2 mutant cells expressing the mutant cDNA demonstrated defects in FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination and DNA damage hypersensitivity. A FANCD2-L822A mutant with defective BLM binding was identified (Figure A, B). We found that Bloom helicase and its DNA end resection activity within BLM-DNA2-RPA were negatively regulated by the heterodimer ID2 (Figure C, D). Both DNA and BLM binding of the ID2 are required for the inhibitory function. The premature DNA end resection and HU sensitivity in FANCD2 deficient and mutant cells are rescued by BLM knockdown. By iPOND assay, we discovered that FANCD2 antagonizes BLM to promote RAD51 recruitment on HU-stalled replication fork. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the DNA end resection activity of BLM-DNA2 is tightly regulated by FANCD2 to ensure that the nuclease DNA2 normally resects the DNA intermediate needed for efficient DNA repair and RAD51 recruitment to protect replication forks. Our findings highlight that ID2-BLM interaction functions in DNA damage repair to maintain genome stability. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Regulation of Mus81-Eme1 structure-specific endonuclease by Eme1 SUMO-binding and Rad3(ATR) kinase is essential in the absence of Rqh1(BLM) helicase

The Mus81-Eme1 structure-specific endonuclease is crucial for the processing of DNA recombination and late replication intermediates. In fission yeast, stimulation of Mus81-Eme1 in response to DNA damage at the G2/M transition relies on Cdc2(CDK1) and DNA damage checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Eme1 and is critical for chromosome stability in absence of the Rqh1(BLM) helicase. Here we identify Rad3(ATR) checkpoint kinase consensus phosphorylation sites and two SUMO interacting motifs (SIM) within a short N-terminal domain of Eme1 that is required for cell survival in absence of Rqh1(BLM). We show that catalytic stimulation of Mus81-Eme1 depends entirely on direct phosphorylation of Eme1 by Rad3(ATR) and that while Eme1 also undergoes Chk1-mediated phosphorylation, this is not essential for catalytic modulation. Both Rad3(ATR)- and Chk1-mediated phosphorylation of Eme1 as well as the SIMs are independently critical for cell fitness in absence of Rqh1(BLM) and abrogating bimodal phosphorylation of Eme1 along with mutating the SIMs is incompatible with rqh1∆ cell viability. Our findings unravel an elaborate regulatory network that is essential for Mus81-Eme1 to fulfill functions that are essential in absence of Rqh1(BLM).

Distinct pathways of homologous recombination controlled by the SWS1–SWSAP1–SPIDR complex

Homology-directed repair (HDR), a critical DNA repair pathway in mammalian cells, is complex, leading to multiple outcomes with different impacts on genomic integrity. However, the factors that control these different outcomes are often not well understood. Here we show that SWS1–SWSAP1-SPIDR controls distinct types of HDR. Despite their requirement for stable assembly of RAD51 recombinase at DNA damage sites, these proteins are not essential for intra-chromosomal HDR, providing insight into why patients and mice with mutations are viable. However, SWS1–SWSAP1-SPIDR is critical for inter-homolog HDR, the first mitotic factor identified specifically for this function. Furthermore, SWS1–SWSAP1-SPIDR drives the high level of sister-chromatid exchange, promotes long-range loss of heterozygosity often involved with cancer initiation, and impels the poor growth of BLM helicase-deficient cells. The relevance of these genetic interactions is evident as SWSAP1 loss prolongs Blm-mutant embryo survival, suggesting a possible druggable target for the treatment of Bloom syndrome.

Distinct pathways of homologous recombination controlled by the SWS1-SWSAP1-SPIDR complex

Homology-directed repair (HDR), a critical DNA repair pathway in mammalian cells, is complex, leading to multiple outcomes with different impacts on genomic integrity. However, the factors that control these different outcomes are often not well understood. Here we show that SWS1-SWSAP1-SPIDR controls distinct types of HDR. Despite their requirement for stable assembly of RAD51 recombinase at DNA damage sites, these proteins are not essential for intra-chromosomal HDR, providing insight into why patients and mice with mutations are viable. However, SWS1-SWSAP1-SPIDR is critical for inter-homolog HDR, the first mitotic factor identified specifically for this function. Furthermore, SWS1-SWSAP1-SPIDR drives the high level of sister-chromatid exchange, promotes long-range loss of heterozygosity often involved with cancer initiation, and impels the poor growth of BLM helicase-deficient cells. The relevance of these genetic interactions is evident as SWSAP1 loss prolongs Blm-mutant embryo survival, suggesting a possible druggable target for the treatment of Bloom syndrome.

Screening antiproliferative drug for breast cancer from bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid tetrandrine and fangchinoline derivatives by targeting BLM helicase

Background The high expression of BLM (Bloom syndrome) helicase in tumors involves its strong association with cell expansion. Bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids own an antitumor property and have developed as candidates for anticancer drugs. This paper aimed to screen potential antiproliferative small molecules from 12 small molecules (the derivatives of bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids tetrandrine and fangchinoline) by targeting BLM642–1290 helicase. Then we explore the inhibitory mechanism of those small molecules on proliferation of MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cells. Methods Fluorescence polarization technique was used to screen small molecules which inhibited the DNA binding and unwinding of BLM642–1290 helicase. The effects of positive small molecules on the ATPase and conformation of BLM642–1290 helicase were studied by the malachite green-phosphate ammonium molybdate colorimetry and ultraviolet spectral scanning, respectively. The effects of positive small molecules on growth of MDA-MB-435 cells were studied by MTT method, colony formation and cell counting method. The mRNA and protein levels of BLM helicase in the MDA-MB-435 cells after positive small molecule treatments were examined by RT-PCR and ELISA, respectively. Results The compound HJNO (a tetrandrine derivative) was screened out which inhibited the DNA binding, unwinding and ATPase of BLM642–1290 helicase. That HJNO could bind BLM642–1290helicase to change its conformationcontribute to inhibiting the DNA binding, ATPase and DNA unwinding of BLM642–1290 helicase. In addition, HJNO showed its inhibiting the growth of MDA-MB-435 cells. The values of IC50 after drug treatments for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h were 19.9 μmol/L, 4.1 μmol/L and 10.9 μmol/L, respectively. The mRNA and protein levels of BLM helicase in MDA-MB-435 cells increased after HJNO treatment. Those showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) compared with negative control when the concentrations of HJNO were 5 μmol/L and 10 μmol/L, which might contribute to HJNO inhibiting the DNA binding, ATPase and DNA unwinding of BLM helicase. Conclusion The small molecule HJNO was screened out by targeting BLM642–1290 helicase. And it showed an inhibition on MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cells expansion.

Single-molecule visualization of human BLM helicase as it acts upon double- and single-stranded DNA substrates

Bloom helicase (BLM) and its orthologs are essential for the maintenance of genome integrity. BLM defects represent the underlying cause of Bloom Syndrome, a rare genetic disorder that is marked by strong cancer predisposition. BLM deficient cells accumulate extensive chromosomal aberrations stemming from dysfunctions in homologous recombination (HR). BLM participates in several HR stages and helps dismantle potentially harmful HR intermediates. However, much remains to be learned about the molecular mechanisms of these BLM-mediated regulatory effects. Here, we use DNA curtains to directly visualize the activity of BLM helicase on single molecules of DNA. Our data show that BLM is a robust helicase capable of rapidly (∼70–80 base pairs per second) unwinding extensive tracts (∼8–10 kilobases) of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Importantly, we find no evidence for BLM activity on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that is bound by replication protein A (RPA). Likewise, our results show that BLM can neither associate with nor translocate on ssDNA that is bound by the recombinase protein RAD51. Moreover, our data reveal that the presence of RAD51 also blocks BLM translocation on dsDNA substrates. We discuss our findings within the context of potential regulator roles for BLM helicase during DNA replication and repair.