Concussion has become a driving force behind forensic neuropsychology practice. This chapter offers vivid, concise, accessible strategies that seasoned forensic experts use in explaining concussion to jurors. Specific topics include explaining the pathophysiology of concussion, how a concussion is diagnosed, posttraumatic amnesia, Glasgow Coma Scale scores, the difference between head injury and brain injury, the typical symptoms of concussion and expected recovery course, the sports as a laboratory research model, problems with the concept of “postconcussion syndrome,” differentiating the literature on chronic traumatic encephalopathy and concussion, and discussing the persistent idea of a “15% miserable minority.” The chapter also provides strategies for explaining alternative narratives as to why a person might feel they have persistent symptoms months or years following a concussion, including diagnosis threat, misattribution, iatrogenesis, “the grass is greener” phenomenon, litigation effects, medication effects, and emotional factors.