Characterization of the Stretch Flangeabitity of High-Strength Bainitic Steel: The Significance of Variant Pairs

Variant pairs have an indispensable function on mechanical properties such as low impact toughness. Therefore, it was assumed that they would also affect the HER (Hole Expansion Ratio, an indicator to evaluate stretch flanging performance). To clarify this, a comprehensive analysis of the common influential factors in an 800 MPa grade low carbon micro-alloyed steel, i.e., the retained austenite, the M/A (Martensite/Austenite) island, the titanium precipitations, the grain diameter, the density of high angle grain boundaries and the textures, was first conducted. It was found that they did not match well with the HER, suggesting that they were not the governing factor for HER in this steel. However, the dominating crystallography groups and the variant pairing results indicated that they fitted well with the HER. In the samples with high HERs, the CP (Close Packed) groups dominated the transformation, wherein one individual CP group consisted of two or more Bain groups, whereas it evolved into the domination of joint CP groups and Bain groups for the low HER sample. Further analysis on the variant pairing features indicated that a correlation occurred between the HER and the high angle variant pairs. In the steels with high HERs, high-angle variant pairs of V1/V2, V1/V3 that transformed from the same CP group, particularly of V1/V2 pair, were mostly generated. They turned to V1/V9, V1/V10, V1/V12, V1/V15, V1/V17, and V1/V18 pairs from differential CP groups, especially the V1/V12 and V1/V15 pair for low-HER steel. This result showed that V1/V2, V1/V12, and V1/V15 might have accounted most for the HER in this steel. The underlying reason was that the V1/V2 pair was specialized in supplying a slip passage for dislocation transmission across a grain boundary with little resistance, whereas the dislocation transmission ability for V1/V12 and V1/V15 pair was particularly poor. Thus, to efficiently enhance the HER, one should regulate the variant pairs by augmenting the V1/V2 fraction and suppressing the formation of the V1/V12 and V1/V15 pair.

EXPERIMENTAL AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF NONAXISYMMETRIC STRETCH FLANGING PROCESS USING AA 5052

This paper deals with experimental and finite element analysis of the stretch flanging process using AA- 5052 sheets of 0.5 mm thick. A parametrical study has been done through finite element simulation to inspect the influence of procedural parametrical properties on maximum thinning (%) within the stretch flanging process. The influence of preliminary flange length of sheet metal blank, punch die clearance, and width was examined on the maximum thinning (%). An explicit dynamic finite element method was utilized using the finite element commercial package ABAQUS. Strain measurement was done after conducting stretch flanging tests. A Mesh convergence examination was carried out to ascertain the maximum percentage accuracy in FEM model. It is found through finite element simulation that the width of sheet metal blanks has a greater impact on the maximum percentage of thinning as compared to preliminary flange length, and clearance of the punch dies.

Compensation of Contour Distortion in Stretch-Flanging Metal Sheets

Stretch-flanging commonly appears at the concave edge of the panel part. Sheet thickness tends to decrease at the center of flange attributed to the outflow of metal flow, and hence causes a radial shrinking of the material. This shrinking pulls the ends of the flange and makes the adjacent surface overcrown. In this paper the effect of punch profiles on a laboratory scale profile, which assimilates the front fender part adjoining the head light, was investigated for the stretch-flanging process. Both the concave and convex punch profiles were considered. SUS 304 stainless steel sheet of 0.6 mm thick was used as the model metal sheet. DynaForm software was used in simulating the stretch flanging process and followed by experimental verification. The results show that a depression angle of 4.4° and an elevation angle 2.6° can produce lowest crown-contour for the concave and convex punches, respectively. The concave punch also causes less thinning at the flange center which makes it a favorable solution than that of the convex punch.