private location
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110453
Author(s):  
Shamika M. Kelley ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Eryn Nicole O’Neal

Sexual assault (SA) decision-making literature primarily focuses on criminal-legal actors and often overlooks victim decision making. This relative dearth in research is problematic, as victims are principal gatekeepers of the criminal-legal process who influence whether perpetrators are arrested and prosecuted. Subsequent victim support is also contingent on the reporting decision. Overall, this body of research would benefit from a better understanding of how victims activate and participate with the criminal-legal system and the potential impact of these decisions on criminal-legal processes. Moreover, victim decision making is often situated in a theoretical analyses. Victim decision making is complex and should be studied within a criminological decision-making framework. Therefore, the current study relies on National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data and applies a focal concerns perspective (FCP), informed by rape culture concepts, to examine why victims of sexual violence may or may not choose to report to legal authorities. The current study offers initial support for the application of FCP to victim reporting decisions. We found that victims consider each of the focal concerns (FC). Victims were more likely to report when offenders threatened them with harm (i.e., suspect blameworthiness), when the offense occurred in a private location (i.e., protection of the community), and when they sought help from victim support agencies or medical treatment (i.e., practical considerations). Additionally, we found that Black victims were more likely to report than other racial-ethnic groups (i.e., perceptual shorthand). These findings highlight a nexus between reporting to police and help-seeking via support agencies. Importantly, the results emphasize the importance for police to implement cultural competence and antiracist training to better support Black victims.


Open Praxis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 509
Author(s):  
Mohammed Juned Hussein ◽  
Javed Yusuf ◽  
Arpana Sandhya Deb ◽  
Letila Fong ◽  
Som Naidu

COVID’19 is hastening the adoption of online learning and teaching worldwide, and across all levels of education. While many of the typical learning and teaching transactions such as lecturing and communicating are easily handled by contemporary online learning technologies, others, such as assessment of learning outcomes with closed book examinations are fraught with challenges. Among other issues to do with students and teachers, these challenges have to do with the ability of teachers and educational organizations to ensure academic integrity in the absence of a live proctor when an examination is being taken remotely and from a private location. A number of online proctoring tools are appearing on the market that portend to offer solutions to some of the major challenges. But for the moment, they too remain untried and tested on any large scale. This includes the cost of the service and their technical requirements. This paper reports on one of the first attempts to properly evaluate a selection of these tools and offer recommendations for educational institutions. This investigation, which was carried out at the University of the South Pacific, comprised a four-phased approach, starting with desk research that was followed with pilot testing by a group of experts as well as students. The elimination of a tool in every phase was based on the ‘survival of the fittest’ approach with each phase building upon the milestones and deliverables from the previous phase. This paper presents the results of this investigation and discusses its key findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Kangsoo Jung ◽  
Seog Park

With the proliferation of wireless communication and mobile devices, various location-based services are emerging. For the growth of the location-based services, more accurate and various types of personal location data are required. However, concerns about privacy violations are a significant obstacle to obtain personal location data. In this paper, we propose a local differential privacy scheme in an environment where there is no trusted third party to implement privacy protection techniques and incentive mechanisms to motivate users to provide more accurate location data. The proposed local differential privacy scheme allows a user to set a personalized safe region that he/she can disclose and then perturb the user’s location within the safe region. It is the way to satisfy the user’s various privacy requirements and improve data utility. The proposed incentive mechanism has two models, and both models pay the incentive differently according to the user’s safe region size to motivate to set a more precise safe region. We verify the proposed local differential privacy algorithm and incentive mechanism can satisfy the privacy protection level while achieving the desirable utility through the experiment.


Sexual Abuse ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107906322094029
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Budd ◽  
Morgan A. Liddic

Sexual assault perpetrated against older adults remains understudied. This research examined sexual assault incidents perpetrated against older women and men (aged 60+) reported to law enforcement. It compared these sexual assault incidents with those committed against middle-age (aged 40–59) and younger (aged 18–39) women and men. National Incident-Based Reporting System data (1992–2015) were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression models. Findings showed incidents involving an older woman, relative to a middle-age and/or younger woman, were significantly more likely to involve stranger perpetrators, occur at a private location, and involve additional violent crime or property crime. Incidents involving an older man, relative to a middle-age and/or younger man, were significantly more likely to involve offenders of more than one sex, older offenders, stranger perpetrators, and additional violent crime or property crime. Results are discussed in relation to prior work and future directions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Nosouhi ◽  
Keshav Sood ◽  
Shui Yu ◽  
Marthie Grobler ◽  
Jingwen Zhang

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Hutton ◽  
Charlotte Lystor

Purpose This paper focuses on the analytical importance of voice and the value of listening and representing voices in private contexts. It highlights the under-theorised position of relationality in family research. The paper introduces the listening guide as a unique analytical approach to sharpen researchers’ understanding of private experiences and articulations. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual and technical paper. It problematises voice, authority and analytical representation in the private location of family and examines how relational dynamics interact with the subtleties of voice in research. It also provides a practical illustration of the listening guide detailing how researchers can use this analytical approach. Findings The paper illustrates how the listening guide works as an analytical method, structured around four stages and applied to interview transcript excerpts. Practical implications The listening guide bridges private and public knowledge-making, by identifying competing voices and recognises relations of power in family research. It provides qualitative market researchers with an analytical tool to hear changes and continuities in participants’ sense of self over time. Social implications The paper highlights how peripheral voices and silence can be analytically surfaced in private domains. A variety of studies and data can be explored with this approach, however, research questions involving vulnerable or marginal experiences are particularly suitable. Originality/value The paper presents the listening guide as a novel analytic method for researching family life – one, which recovers the importance of voice and serves as a means to address the lack of debate on voice and authority in qualitative market research. It also highlights the under-theorised position of relationality in tracing the multiple subjectivities of research participants. It interrupts conventional qualitative analysis methods, directing attention away from conventional coding and towards listening as an alternative route to knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document