mixed oxide fuel
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

304
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 103844
Author(s):  
Mariana C. Betancourt ◽  
Carlos R. García Hernández ◽  
Dany S. Dominguez ◽  
Leorlen Y. Rojas Mazaira ◽  
Carlos A. Brayner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 318 ◽  
pp. 39-47
Author(s):  
Ahli K.D. Willie ◽  
Hong Tao Zhao ◽  
M. Annor-Nyarko

In this work, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was utilized in relation to access the thermal conductivity of UO2, PuO2 and (U, Pu)O2 in temperature range of 500–3000 K. Diffusion study on mixed oxide (MOX) was also performed to assess the effect of radiation damage by heavy ions at burnup temperatures. Analysis of the lattice thermal conductivity of irradiated MOX to its microstructure was carried out to enhance the irradiation defects with how high burnup hinders fuel properties and its pellet-cladding interaction. Fission gas diffusion as determined was mainly modelled by main diffusion coefficient. Degradation of diffusivity is predicted in MOX as composition deviate from the pure end members. The concentration of residual anion defects is considerably higher than that of cations in all oxides. Depending on the diffusion behavior of the fuel lattice, there was decrease in the ratio of anion to cation defects with increasing temperature. Besides, the modern mixed oxide fuel releases fission gas compared to that of UO2 fuel at moderate burnups.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Richard M. Ambrosi ◽  
Daniel P. Kramer ◽  
Emily Jane Watkinson ◽  
Ramy Mesalam ◽  
Alessandra Barco

Author(s):  
Jean H J Lavarenne ◽  
Evaldas Bubelis ◽  
Una Davies ◽  
Simone Gianfelici ◽  
Solène Gicquel ◽  
...  

Abstract Accurate coupled neutronic-thermal-hydraulic analysis of SFRs requires an accurate calculation of the fuel-to-clad gap conductance. In this paper, the gap conductance of the ESFR-SMART MOX pins is investigated through modelling in seven independent fuel performance codes, to provide confidence in results and understand the uncertainties associated with the predictions. This paper presents a comparison of the conductance and predicted fuel temperature distribution between codes. The values produced from the codes are then combined to produce a best-estimate prediction of the gap conductance expressed as a function of nodal fuel rating and burn-up for all seven codes. A fit was applied to the data thus obtained. The spread between results is such that, to 95% confidence, conductance predictions may vary from the correlation by up to a factor of ~4. The gap conductance results show a general increase of conductance with fuel rating and burn-up, from 0.22 at 0 burn-up and 10 kW.m^(-1) to 0.45 at 0 burn-up and 50 kW.m^(-1) and to 1.00 W.?cm?^(-2).K^(-1) at 150 GWd.t^(-1) and 50 kW.m^(-1). Some spread between codes has been noted and appears to be consistent with the spread previously published. There is good agreement between codes at low burn-up for fuel temperature predictions. The spread between codes increases with burn-up due to multiple phenomena including JOG formation and clad swelling.


Energy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 118744
Author(s):  
Eeshu Raaj Saasthaa Arumuga Kumar ◽  
Mihir Kiritbhai Pancholi ◽  
Piotr Darnowski ◽  
Aleksandra Dzido

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document