THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ABILITY TO ACHIEVE SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE

The enactment of the law in society aims to create justice, legal certainty, benefit and social empowerment for the community, to lead to the ideals of the court as a protector of society, the judge must always prioritize the 4 (four) legal objectives above in every decision he makes. This is in line with what the law is based on, namely the law for the welfare of the community. The poor are often victims of unfair law enforcement due to their ignorance of law enforcement and financial incompetence. The purpose of this study is to analyze the progressive law applied to poor defendants seeking substantive justice and to find out and analyze the state should be able to assist poor defendants in the judicial process in accordance with the rule of law principle. This research uses normative juridical method. Judges in deciding legal cases for the poor should have a progressive view, thus judges will conceptualize each article in the legislation not only as a statement about the existence of a causal (cause and effect) relationship that is straightforward according to logical law but also always contains moral substance originating from ethics and professionalism of judges.

Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak

In Ignorance of Law, Doug Husak defends a version of legal moralism on which ‘we should recognize a presumption that the criminal law should…be based, on conform to, or mirror critical morality’. Here I explore whether substantive criminal law rules should directly mirror not moral blameworthiness, but a distinct legal notion of criminal culpability – akin to moral blameworthiness but refined for deployment in legal systems. Contra Husak, I argue that the criminal law departing from the moral ideal embodied in the standard of moral blameworthiness is not always to be regretted. After showing how criminal culpability might come apart from moral blameworthiness, I argue that my alternative to Husak’s view has practically interesting upshots. In particular, it allows us to resist Husak’s central conclusions about the exculpatory force of normative ignorance. There are good reasons for the criminal law to make certain charitable presumptions about citizens as competent agents, which the standard of moral blameworthiness needn’t similarly embody, and this calls into question Husak’s argument for the claim that normative ignorance exculpates.

PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEHUTANAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2013 TENTANG PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN PERUSAKAN HUTAN DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT

Forest destructions has been escalating worldwide, including in Indonesia. Therefore, the Government issued Law Number 18 / 2013 on the Prevention and Eradiction of Deforestation (P3H) which was expected to guarantee legal certainty with emphasis on eradication of organized forest destruction. The problem to be discussed in this paper is about law enforcement and application of Law Number 18 / 2013 which frequently used to criminalize the indigenous people in Indonesia. The indigenous people have been criminalized on the ground of unlawful forest products utilization, while they merely foraging to fulfill their basic necessities. The criminalization of indigenous people is a conclusive evidence, which proof that Indonesian Goverment has been neglecting the indigenous people’s right. This paper use normative approach. The conclusion of this paper analyze that the problem of the criminalization happens in implementation level, which caused by the ignorance of law enforcement apparatus and vested interest.

Stosowanie prawa a kontrola jego konstytucyjności zdania odrębne Profesora Leona Kieresa do wyroków Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

THE APPLICATION OF LAW AND THE CONTROL OF ITS CONSTITUTIONALITY DISSENTING OPINIONS FILED BY PROFESSOR LEON KIERES REGARDING THE JUDGMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRIBUNALThis article provides readers with information relating to dissenting opinions fi led by Prof. Leon Kieres regarding the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal. The intention of the author is to present Professor’s views on the application of law in various contexts. Therefore, separate subsections present a review of his ideas on the following topics: the application of law and the ability to complain to the Constitutional Tribunal, the incorrect application of law/ignorance of law and the assessment of constitutionality, the application of the unconstitutional law and the need for control, the future practice of applying the law and its constitutionality.

Basic concepts and features of good and service tax in india

This paper is an analysis of what the impact of Goods and Services Tax will be on Indian Tax Scenario. Here stated with a brief description of the historical scenario of Indian taxation and its tax structure. Then the need arose for the change in tax structure from traditional to GST model. GST has be detailed discuss in this paper as the background, silent features and the impact of GST in the present tax scenario in India. GST is the only indirect tax that directly affects all sectors and sections of our economy. Ignorance of law is no excuse but is liable to panel provisions, hence why not start learning GST and avoid the cost of ignorance. The GST is aimed at creating a single, unified market that will benefit both corporate and the economy. Several countries implemented this tax system followed by France, the first country introduced GST. India is a centralized democratic and therefore the GST will be implemented parallel by the central and state governments as CGST and SGST respectively. The objective will be to maintain a commonality between the basic structure and design of the CGST and SG