scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEHUTANAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2013 TENTANG PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN PERUSAKAN HUTAN DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat ◽  
Luisa Srihandayani ◽  
Kexia Goutama ◽  
Yoefanca Halim
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Ignorance Of Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Implementation Level

Forest destructions has been escalating worldwide, including in Indonesia. Therefore, the Government issued Law Number 18 / 2013 on the Prevention and Eradiction of Deforestation (P3H) which was expected to guarantee legal certainty with emphasis on eradication of organized forest destruction. The problem to be discussed in this paper is about law enforcement and application of Law Number 18 / 2013 which frequently used to criminalize the indigenous people in Indonesia. The indigenous people have been criminalized on the ground of unlawful forest products utilization, while they merely foraging to fulfill their basic necessities. The criminalization of indigenous people is a conclusive evidence, which proof that Indonesian Goverment has been neglecting the indigenous people’s right. This paper use normative approach. The conclusion of this paper analyze that the problem of the criminalization happens in implementation level, which caused by the ignorance of law enforcement apparatus and vested interest.

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KONTEKS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Cyber Crime Handling by the Special Criminal Directorate North Maluku Polda

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Irwan Ahdi ◽  
Syawal Abdulajid ◽  
Suwarti Suwarti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Special Training ◽  
The North ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Indicators Of Success

This study aims to analyze the indicators that affect the effectiveness of the handling of Cyber Crime by the Directorate of Crimes at the North Maluku Police. As well as to reveal the process of handling Cyber Crime by the Directorate of Crime and Crime of North Maluku Police. Currently there are technical obstacles that result in the lack of legal certainty related to the problem of Cyber Crime, including the lack of structural and channeled coordination, as well as an understanding of the application of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 About Information and Electronic Transactions. Thus, the indicators of success that can affect the effectiveness of handling Cyber Crime by the Directorate of Crimes at the North Maluku Police are the Legal Mastery of the Directorate of Crimes in North Maluku regarding the ITE Law, Appropriate Law Enforcement, Community Participation, and Adequate Facilities and Infrastructure. Efforts to Handle Cyber Crime by the Crimean Directorate of North Maluku Police are the control of investigators in the field of Technology by equipping and facilitating officers with special training related to Cyber Crime, as well as providing modern facilities in investigations/investigations. In addition, in dealing with cybercrimes, it is necessary to introduce the paradigm and construction of investigator thinking from formalistic to imaginative, progressive and prioritizes the benefit of the community.

scholarly journals Tinjaun Yuridis Terhadap Media Sosial Yang Menyalahgunakan Dan Mengakibatkan Penyemaran Nama Baik (putusan : No574 K/pid.sus/MA/2018)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pardamean Sitompul ◽  
Okmin Manurung
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Many ◽  
Research Show

The misuse of social media that causes defamation Decision: No 574 K / pid.sus / MA / 2018, is one of the many legal problems that have been ensnared due to the misuse of social media. The author uses three types of data sources, namely primary data sources of data obtained from laws and Supreme Court decisions. And secondary data data obtained from law books, law magazines and legal writings. And the last is tertiary legal material is complementary legal material obtained from dictionaries and the internet. and data analysis using qualitative data which is data in the form of words that talk about statutory regulations. The results of the research show that in the application of law enforcement of the ITE Law article 27 paragraph 1 in conjunction with article 45 paragraph 1 there is still a sense of injustice for the community, factors that must also be considered in imposing sanctions on victims of Baiq Nuril. and sociology of law and a strong conscience against actions or decisions in law enforcement. In this case, the government should have strict supervision of the use of information technology. This is aimed at preventing and overcoming efficiently and effectively the act of defamation through social media.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI ASAS TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KERUSAKAN TERUMBU KARANG (Studi Kasus Kecelakaan Kapal MV Caledonian Sky di Raja Ampat)

Law Review ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Kristwan Genova Damanik
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
State Responsibility ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Law System ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
The People ◽  
Legal Sanctions ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Understanding

<em>In Law No.32/2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, the principle of state responsibility is one of the means of protecting pollution and/or environmental damage. The principle of state responsibility server to ensure the utilization of natural resources for the welfare of the people, both present and future generations.Normatively, laws and regulations regulate sanctions for perpetrators of environmental violations, but in the application of law there is unity of action (ego sectoral), so the dispute resolution becomes complicated<strong>. </strong>Inadequate legal understanding of the state’s affirmative officials results  in  constrained law enforcement, and well as regulated legal sanctions for officials who neglect to carry out the task of giving the impression the government is not serious about addressing environment violations.The various  weaknesses and obstacles in applying the principle of state responsibility in the environmental law system in Indonesia related to ship MV Caledonian Sky  accident is the core of research that poured  in this paper</em>

scholarly journals Incoming Extradition in Indonesia and Its Implication to Human Rights

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Efendi Lod Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Field Study ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
International Dimension ◽  
Political Concern ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Government

<p class="WalrevAbstrak"><span lang="NL">Law enforcement to transnational fugitives especially those perpetrators of money laundering with international dimension in Indonesia, in particular related to incoming extradition is needed to reconstruct. This is because hitherto, the decision to extradite is the decision of the executive branch as stipulated in Act No.1 of 1979 on Extradition. Hence, the consideration for the government to extradite is more on political concern rather than judicial. This practice is deemed neglecting the protection of human rights and creating legal uncertainty, especially in relation to detention period that could exceed beyond admissible time as stipulated in KUHAP because of the grace period on the issuance of the Presidential Decision. This research is doctrinal and field study. Based on findings in the field, incoming extradition request must be based on the court’s decision, or judicial order in the future to ensure protection of human rights and legal certainty of the person who is subject of the extradition and to the requested country.</span></p><p class="WalrevAbstrak"> </p><p class="IABSSS">Penegakan hukum terhadap buronan transnasional, terutama para pelaku pencucian uang di Indonesia, perlu sebuah rekontruksi khususnya terkait dengan ekstradisi. Ini karena sampai sekarang, keputusan untuk mengekstradisi adalah keputusan cabang eksekutif sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.1 tahun 1979 tentang Ekstradisi. Oleh karena itu, pertimbangan bagi pemerintah untuk mengekstradisi lebih pada masalah politik daripada peradilan. Praktik ini dianggap mengabaikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum, terutama dalam kaitannya dengan masa penahanan yang dapat melebihi melampaui waktu yang dapat diterima sebagaimana diatur dalam KUHAP karena masa tenggang pada penerbitan Keputusan Presiden. Penelitian ini bersifat doktrinal dan studi lapangan. Berdasarkan temuan di lapangan, permintaan ekstradisi yang masuk harus didasarkan pada keputusan pengadilan, atau perintah pengadilan di masa depan untuk memastikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan kepastian hukum dari orang yang menjadi sasaran ekstradisi dan ke negara yang diminta.</p>

scholarly journals The Prosecutor’s Authority to Conduct a Criminal Investigation Based on The Government Administration Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
Leonardo Adiguna
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Corruption Case ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Coordination Patterns ◽  
Financial Losses

This research uses a normative approach, which is carried out by examining laws and theories. Also, this study uses a case approach, namely the 2017 village fund corruption case in Pekon Sukaratu. The main problem in this res­earch is what is the authority of the prosecutor in conducting investigations into criminal acts of corruption after the passage of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and whether the investigation carried out by the prosecutor at the Pringsewu District Prosecutor's Office in coordination with the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus or Aparatur Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (APIP) against the allegations a criminal act of corruption in the management of village funds in 2017 in Pekon Sukaratu whose losses to the state have been returned have met the principle of legal certainty. The research results show that the prosecutor has the authority to carry out the law enforcement process, namely the investigation of suspected corruption crimes as stipulated in Article 30 paragraph (1) letter d of the law on the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the results of the research that has been done, it is better if changes in laws and regulations related to the elements of corruption in Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime because there is a product of the Constitutional Court with the decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Besides, there is a need for socialization for prosecutors regarding their authority in TPK investigations and related to coordination patterns with the authority of APIP in carrying out investigations and calculating state financial losses.

scholarly journals Incoming Extradition in Indonesia and Its Implication to Human Rights

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Efendi Lod Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Field Study ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
International Dimension ◽  
Political Concern ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Government

<p class="WalrevAbstrak"><span lang="NL">Law enforcement to transnational fugitives especially those perpetrators of money laundering with international dimension in Indonesia, in particular related to incoming extradition is needed to reconstruct. This is because hitherto, the decision to extradite is the decision of the executive branch as stipulated in Act No.1 of 1979 on Extradition. Hence, the consideration for the government to extradite is more on political concern rather than judicial. This practice is deemed neglecting the protection of human rights and creating legal uncertainty, especially in relation to detention period that could exceed beyond admissible time as stipulated in KUHAP because of the grace period on the issuance of the Presidential Decision. This research is doctrinal and field study. Based on findings in the field, incoming extradition request must be based on the court’s decision, or judicial order in the future to ensure protection of human rights and legal certainty of the person who is subject of the extradition and to the requested country.</span></p><p class="WalrevAbstrak"> </p><p class="IABSSS">Penegakan hukum terhadap buronan transnasional, terutama para pelaku pencucian uang di Indonesia, perlu sebuah rekontruksi khususnya terkait dengan ekstradisi. Ini karena sampai sekarang, keputusan untuk mengekstradisi adalah keputusan cabang eksekutif sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.1 tahun 1979 tentang Ekstradisi. Oleh karena itu, pertimbangan bagi pemerintah untuk mengekstradisi lebih pada masalah politik daripada peradilan. Praktik ini dianggap mengabaikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum, terutama dalam kaitannya dengan masa penahanan yang dapat melebihi melampaui waktu yang dapat diterima sebagaimana diatur dalam KUHAP karena masa tenggang pada penerbitan Keputusan Presiden. Penelitian ini bersifat doktrinal dan studi lapangan. Berdasarkan temuan di lapangan, permintaan ekstradisi yang masuk harus didasarkan pada keputusan pengadilan, atau perintah pengadilan di masa depan untuk memastikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan kepastian hukum dari orang yang menjadi sasaran ekstradisi dan ke negara yang diminta.</p>

scholarly journals KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN BUDAYA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boni Suparto Wuarlela
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Early Age ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Unitary State ◽  
The Future ◽  
Learning Programs ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

One of the biggest problems faced by the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is the handling of the problem of corruption which seems to never end, both in terms of eradicating or implementing laws regarding corruption. In Indonesia, an independent institution specifically dealing with corruption issues has been established, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) since 2002. However, the fact is that until 2020 it has not really been able to effectively address the problem of corruption in Indonesia with various arrests made by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). proves that the problem of corruption that occurs inthis country and the government in Indonesia needs serious attention from various parties who play an important role in dealing with the problem. This writing aims to determine the extent to which legal certainty applies in the process of eradicating corruption in Indonesia, the researchmethod used is the normative research method. Based on the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that the laws governing and law enforcement officials inovercoming the problem of corruption in Indonesia have not been fully effective in providing legal certainty to corrupt actors and the application of existing laws has not been able to fully guarantee the disappearance or no more corruption. will happen in the future, and there is a need for prevention that can give birth to new corruptors in the future by further increasing anti-corruption learning programs and carrying out various socialization or prevention of acts of corruption from an early age which is felt to help overcome the problem of corruptors in this country.

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM KONFLIK AGRARIA YANG TERKAIT DENGAN HAK-HAK MASYARAKAT ADAT PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO.35/PUU-X/2012 (Agrarian Conflict Law Enforcement That Was Related to The Rights of Indigenous Peoples Following the Ruling of the Constitutional CourtNo.35/ PUU- X/2012)

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Ahyar Ari Gayo
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Indigenous Forest ◽  
National Police

Kebijakan terkait dengan masyarakat adat yang paling banyak di sorot selama ini adalah di bidang tanah dan sumberdaya alam. Dengan adanya keputusan Mahkamah Konstitus atas Perkara nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 Pengujian terhadap UU No. 41 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kehutanan yang menyatakan hutan adat bukan hutan negara, belum menjadi kebaikan bagi masyaraka tadat. Adapaun permasalahan yang akan diteliti adalah: Bagaimana Penegakan Hukum Konflik-konflik Agraria yang terkait dengan hak-hak masyarakat adat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.35/PUU-X/2012, Apa hambatan-hambatan dan Kebijakan apa yang dilakukan Pemerintah untuk menyelesaikan Konflik Agraria yang terkait dengan hak-hak masyarakat adat. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis sosiologi dilengkapi penggalian informasi dengan stakeholder terkait dalam rangka mempertajam kajian dan analisis Penyelesaian yang menyeluruh sebagai implementasi norma konstitusi yang ditegaskan oleh Putusan MK 35/PUU-X/2012 tidak membuat jalan lain tertutup. Antara lain Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang bersebaran dan perlu sinkronisasi, Penerapan penegakan hukum secara sungguh-sunguh dari berbagai stikholder terkait termasuk hasil Inkuiri Nasional Masyarakat Adat yang diselenggarakan oleh Komnas HAM untuk memberi pilihan-pilihan kepada masyarakat. Upaya yang serius dan koordinasi antar kementerian atau lembaga terkait dalam rangk menegakkan konflik-konflik agraria yang terkait dengan hak-hak masyarakat adat tanpa ada ego sektoral. Rekomendasi penelitian ini adalah koordinasi antar institusi atau lembaga terkait seperti Kementerian BPN dan Tata Ruang, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Polri dan tokoh-tokoh masyarakat adat, Komnas HAM, serta Kemendagri agar mendorong Pemda segera mendata, melakukan penelitian dan mengukuhan keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat beserta wilayah adatnya. AbstractPolicies related to indigenous peoples most in highlight during this time is in the field of land and natural resources. With the Konstitus Court decision on Case No. 35 / PUU-X / 2012 Testing of Law No. 41 of 1999 on Forestry which states the indigenous forest instead of the country’s forests, yet be good for Indigenous. The problems to be studied are: How Law Enforcement Agrarian Conflicts related to the rights of indigenous peoples Following the Ruling of the Constitutional Court No.35 / PUU-X / 2012, what barriers and what policies made by the government to resolve the Agrarian Conflict related to the rights of indigenous peoples. Methods This study used juridical sociology include extracting information with relevant stakeholders in order to sharpen the research and thorough analysis of the Settlement as the implementation of the constitutional norm which is confirmed by the Constitutional Court Decision 35 / PUU-X / 2012 did not make another road closed. Among other legislation that needs to be spread and synchronization, Application of law enforcement were full of a variety of related stikholder including the results of the National Inquiry Indigenous Peoples organized by the Commission for giving choices to the public. Serious effort and coordination among relevant ministries or agencies in enforcing circuit has agrarian conflicts related to the rights of indigenous peoples without any sectoral ego. Recommendations of this study is coordination between institutions or agencies such as the Ministry of BPN and Spatial Planning, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, the National Police and leaders of indigenous peoples, the Commission, as well as the Ministry of Home Affairs in order to encourage the provincial government immediately assess, conduct research and confirm existence of Indigenous People and their customary territory.

scholarly journals IMPIAN YANG TERABAIKAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (II) ◽  
pp. 181-204
Author(s):  
Amrunsyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

This paper is entitled "The Neglected Dream" (Implementation of the Purpose of Law and Criminal Law in Indonesia). Law and the purpose of law have interrelated and inseparable links. The law always plays an important role in a country even the law has a multifunction with the aim of the public good in order to achieve justice, legal certainty, order, expediency, and others. However, this is far from the fire. That is, the public is only given the wind of heaven and dreams that wash away while the state authorities use the law as a tool to suppress society, so that society can be positioned in accordance with the desires of the state authorities. The implementation of the law and the purpose of the law in force in Indonesia is clearly visible, so through a number of legal theories set forth in this paper will be a little stomping for anyone who understands it when compensating for the facts that occur in the midst of society. In fact, for people who want to get legal justice but in reality are entangled in the law. The government should be serious in responding to this because the people have given full mandate to manage this country, including in dealing with legal issues, both in terms of legal structure, legal substance and legal culture played by law enforcement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document