Analisa Pencarian Data *.Doc pada Komputer Menerapkan Metode Sequensial With Sentinel

In the development of computers often encounter problems about how to get a data in a large data set and various types of data. In its need to find that data, there are various search algorithms, namely the sequential with Sentinel method. Searching is data search by searching where the data is searched. The place for searching the data can be an array in memory, it can also be in a file in external storage. When the amount of data is already so large, a method is needed to get the data needed. Several methods of organizing data have made the process of finding data more efficient. In the problem that often occurs a lot of lost doc data dimension or forget the name of the stored data and therefore applied how to find doc document data that is on the computer. A data contained in the storage media with this search method is created using a search algorithm that uses successive method so that the data sought knows its whereabouts. in overcoming the problem is applied The method of doc data extension can be done in two ways, namely internal search (internal searching) and external search (external searching). In an internal search, all records that are known to be in a computer reminder are on an external search, not all records that are known to be in a computer reminder.

Introduction of screening guidelines for men who have sex with men at an STD clinic, the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Australia

Background: A recent audit indicated that a substantial proportion of men who have sex with men (MSM) were not screened for rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia at the Melbourne Sexual Health Clinic, Melbourne, Australia. In response, screening guidelines for MSM were introduced at the clinic using a computer reminder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the guidelines and alert on screening MSM for gonorrhoea and chlamydia. Methods: The medical records of MSM were reviewed for gonorrhoea and chlamydia screening by site (pharyngeal, urethral and rectal), four months before the implementation of the guidelines and alert (July to October 2002), and one year thereafter (beginning November 2002). Results: After the introduction of the guidelines there was a significant increase in rectal chlamydia testing (55% to 67%, P < 0.001), and significant reduction in pharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing (65% to 28%, P < 0.001, and 83% to 76%, P = 0.015 respectively). The proportion of tests that were positive by any site did not change (7% to 7%). Conclusions: The introduction of a computer reminder for new guidelines was temporally associated with screening that conformed more closely to clinical guidelines.