transitory shocks
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

68
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hardik Marfatia

Purpose There is no research on understanding the difference in the nature of volatility and what it entails for the underlying relationship between foreign institutional investors (FII) flows and stock market movements. The purpose of this paper is to explore how permanent and transitory shocks dominate the common movement between FII flows and the stock market returns. As emerging markets are a major destination of international portfolio investments, the author uses India as a perfect case study to this end. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses the permanent-transitory as well as a trend-cycle decomposition approach to gain further insights into the common movement between foreign institutional investors (FII) flows and the stock market. Findings When the author identifies innovations based on their degree of persistence, transitory shocks dominate stock returns, whereas permanent shocks explain movements in foreign institutional investors (FII) flows. Also, stock returns have a larger cyclical component compared to cycles in foreign flows. The authors find the sharp downward (upward) movement in the stock market (FII flows) cycle in the initial period of the COIVD-19 pandemic was quickly reversed and currently, the stock market (FII flows) is historically above (below) the long-term trend, hinting at a correction in months ahead. The authors find strikingly similar stock market cycles during the global financial crisis and COVID-19 period. Research limitations/implications Evidence suggests the presence of long stock market cycles – substantial and persistent deviations of actual price from its fundamental (trend) value determined by the shared relationship with foreign flows. This refutes the efficient market hypothesis and makes a case favoring diversification gains from investing in India. Further, transitory shocks dominate the forecast error of stock market movements. Thus, the Indian market provides profit opportunities to foreign investors who use a momentum-based strategy. The author also finds support for the positive feedback trading strategy used by foreign investors. Practical implications There is a need for policymakers to account for the foreign undercurrents while formulating economic policies, given the findings that it is the permanent shocks that mostly explain movements in foreign institutional flows. Further, the author finds only stock markets error-correct in response to any short-term shocks to the shared long-term relationship, highlighting the disruptive (though transitory) role of FII flows. Originality/value Unlike existing studies, the author models the relationship between stock market returns and foreign institutional investors (FII) flows by distinguishing between the permanent and transitory movements in these two variables. Ignoring this distinction, as done in existing literature, can affect the soundness of the estimated parameter that captures the nexus between these two variables. In addition, while it may be common to find that stock market returns and FII flows move together, the paper further contributes by decomposing each variable into a trend and a cycle using this shared relationship. The paper also contributes to understanding the impact of COVID-19 on this relationship.


2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Abdelraouf ◽  
Hoda El-Abbadi ◽  
Diaa Noureldin

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (02) ◽  
pp. 41-59
Author(s):  
Andrew Foerster ◽  
◽  
Pierre-Daniel Sarte ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Luis A. Gil-Alana ◽  
Rouhollah Nazari ◽  
Mahdi Khodaparast Mashhadi

This paper investigates the structure of oil production in the OPEC by using techniques based on fractional integration. This analysis permits us to determine if exogenous shocks affecting the series will have transitory or permanent effects. The results show evidence reversion to the mean (and thus transitory shocks) for Ecuador, Qatar, Algeria, Nigeria, Iraq and the U.A.E., and lack of it (and thus permanency of shocks) for Arabia Saudi and Angola. For the remaining five countries (Gabon, Kuwait, Iran, Libya and Venezuela) the results are ambiguous depending on the specification of the error term. Allowing for structural breaks, we notice that most of the countries display about four breaks and the orders of integration change substantially across the countries and the subsamples.


2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (10) ◽  
pp. 3585-3616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supreet Kaur

This paper develops a new approach to test for downward wage rigidity by examining transitory shocks to labor demand (i.e., rainfall) across 600 Indian districts. Nominal wages rise during positive shocks but do not fall during droughts. In addition, transitory positive shocks generate ratcheting: after they have dissipated, wages do not adjust back down. Ratcheting reduces employment by 9 percent, indicating that rigidities distort employment levels. Inflation, which is unaffected by local rainfall, enables downward real wage adjustments—offering causal evidence for its labor market effects. Surveys suggest that individuals believe nominal wage cuts are unfair and lead to effort reductions. (JEL E24, E31, J23, J31, O15, O18, R23)


2019 ◽  
Vol 129 (624) ◽  
pp. 2999-3024 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Bhaskar

Abstract Secular trends in cohort size cause large marriage market imbalances due to the age gap at marriage between men and women. Positive cohort growth adversely affects women in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Secular decline improves their position in East Asia. I show that the age gap at marriage will not adjust in order to equilibrate the marriage market in response to persistent imbalances, even though it accommodates transitory shocks. This implies large distributional consequences on the sexes, and may increase dowries. I also analyse transition dynamics between steady states and examine how age gaps and transfers adjust in the transition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt F. Lewis ◽  
Francisco Vazquez‐Grande

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document