Scheuermann Kyphosis for dummies

Scheuermann kyphosis debuts in young adolescents and it is defined as a fixed hyperkyphosis >40º Cobb, with associated anterior wedging of vertebral endplates of >5º in three or more adjacent vertebrae. It is thought to be caused by mechanical stress on structurally deficitary vertebral endplates. For its diagnosis, clinical history and plain radiographs are used, but also MRI when there is neurological affection. Treatment depends on the severity of the curve: those <60º can be treated orthopedically with Milwaukee bracing in combination with rehabilitation treatment (stretching or muscle strengthening) and postural hygiene. If >70º, surgical treatment is indicated using a posterior-only approach, as it reduces de apparition of complications when compared with anterior and combined approach. Vertebral osteotomies will be made depending on the DAR. We will use pedicular screws and bars, and transverse hooks to end instrumentation, as we attach distally the SSV and proximally the first kyphotic vertebra, to avoid revision surgery. Among the complications (14%) we find surgical site infection (up to 10%), neurological injury (8%), or pulmonary complications derived from anterior approach (20%)

Posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior fusion in Scheuermann disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVECombined anterior-posterior (AP) surgery is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of Scheuermann kyphosis. There are trends toward posterior-only (PO) surgery for correcting this deformity because of the availability of multisegmental compression instruments and posterior shortening osteotomy. To date, surgical strategies for Scheuermann kyphosis remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare various surgical approaches for the treatment of Scheuermann kyphosis, including radiological correction and intraoperative outcomes, using a systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODSA comprehensive database search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies concerning Scheuermann kyphosis. The inclusion criteria were direct comparisons between AP and PO surgeries for Scheuermann kyphosis and assessment of the angle of thoracic kyphosis preoperatively and postoperatively. The authors used the principles of a cumulative meta-analysis by updating the pooled estimate of the treatment effect.RESULTSData from 13 studies involving 1147 participants (542 patients in the AP group and 605 patients in the PO group) were included. The average age was 18.2 years for the AP and 17.9 years for the PO group. The overall mean difference of changes in thoracic kyphosis angles between the AP and PO surgeries was 0.23° (95% CI −2.24° to 2.71°). In studies in which posterior shortening osteotomies were not performed, PO surgery resulted in a significantly low degree of correction of thoracic kyphosis, with a mean difference of 5.59° (95% CI 0.34°–10.83°). Studies in which osteotomies were performed revealed that the angle of correction for PO surgery was comparable to that of AP surgery. Regardless of fixation methods, PO surgical approaches achieved comparable angles.CONCLUSIONSPO surgery using posterior osteotomies can achieve correction of Scheuermann kyphosis as successfully as AP surgery does. Reflecting the advancement of surgical technology, large prospective studies are necessary to identify the proper treatments for Scheuermann kyphosis.

Under-contouring of rods: a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior correction of Scheuermann kyphosis

OBJECTIVEScheuermann kyphosis (SK) could require surgical treatment in certain situations. A posterior reduction is the most widespread treatment so far, although the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is one of the possible complications of this procedure. The contour of the proximal part of the rod could influence the occurrence of PJK in SK patients. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the proximal rod contour on the occurrence of a PJK complication in SK patients.METHODSThis retrospective monocentric study was performed in the Nanjing Spine Surgery Department. All eligible patients had undergone posterior correction surgery with pedicle screws only between 2002 and 2017 and had at least 24 months of follow-up. The presence of PJK was quantified on radiographs using the proximal junctional angle (PJA > 10° at the last follow-up). The authors propose a new radiological parameter to measure the angulation of the proximal part of the instrumentation: the proximal contouring rod angle (PCRA) is the angle between the upper endplate of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and the lower endplate of the second vertebra caudal to the UIV. The patients were analyzed according to the presence or absence of PJK. A t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and logistic regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis.RESULTSSixty-two patients treated for SK were included in this study. The mean age was 18.6 ± 8.5 years, and the mean follow-up was 42.5 ± 16.4 months. The mean correction rate of global kyphosis was 46.4% ± 13.7%. At the last follow-up, 17 patients (27.4%) presented with PJK. No significant difference was found between the PJK and non-PJK groups in terms of age and other preoperative variables. A significant difference in the postoperative PCRA was found between the PJK and non-PJK groups (8.2° ± 4.9° vs 15.7° ± 6.6°, respectively; p = 0.001). A postoperative PCRA less than 10.1° predicted a significantly higher risk for PJK (p = 0.002, OR 2.431, 95% CI 1.781–4.133).CONCLUSIONSUnder-contouring of the proximal part of the rods (lower than 10°) is a risk factor for PJK after posterior correction of SK.

Treatment approaches for Scheuermann kyphosis: a systematic review of historic and current management

OBJECTIVEScheuermann kyphosis (SK) is an idiopathic kyphosis characterized by anterior wedging of ≥ 5° at 3 contiguous vertebrae managed with either nonoperative or operative treatment. Nonoperative treatment typically employs bracing, while operative treatment is performed with either a combined anterior-posterior fusion or posterior-only approach. Current evidence for these approaches has largely been derived from retrospective case series or focused reviews. Consequently, no consensus exists regarding optimal management strategies for patients afflicted with this condition. In this study, the authors systematically review the literature on SK with respect to indications for treatment, complications of treatment, differences in correction and loss of correction, and changes in treatment over time.METHODSUsing PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, all full-text publications on the operative and nonoperative treatment for SK in the peer-reviewed English-language literature between 1950 and 2017 were screened. Inclusion criteria involved fully published, peer-reviewed, retrospective or prospective studies of the primary medical literature. Studies were excluded if they did not provide clinical outcomes and statistics specific to SK, described fewer than 2 patients, or discussed results in nonhuman models. Variables extracted included treatment indications and methodology, maximum pretreatment kyphosis, immediate posttreatment kyphosis, kyphosis at last follow-up, year of treatment, and complications of treatment.RESULTSOf 659 unique studies, 45 met our inclusion criteria, covering 1829 unique patients. Indications for intervention were pain, deformity, failure of nonoperative treatment, and neural impairment. Among operatively treated patients, the most common complications were hardware failure and proximal or distal junctional kyphosis. Combined anterior-posterior procedures were additionally associated with neural, pulmonary, and cardiovascular complications. Posterior-only approaches offered superior correction compared to combined anterior-posterior fusion; both groups provided greater correction than bracing. Loss of correction was similar across operative approaches, and all were superior to bracing. Cross-sectional analysis suggested that surgeons have shifted from anterior-posterior to posterior-only approaches over the past two decades.CONCLUSIONSThe data indicate that for patients with SK, surgery affords superior correction and maintenance of correction relative to bracing. Posterior-only fusion may provide greater correction and similar loss of correction compared to anterior-posterior approaches along with a smaller complication profile. This posterior-only approach has concomitantly gained popularity over the combined anterior-posterior approach in recent years.