Higher pedicle screw density does not improve curve correction in Lenke 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Purpose Higher pedicle screw density posterior spinal fusion (PSF) constructs have not been shown to result in improved curve correction in Lenke 1 and 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) but do increase cost. The purpose of this study questioned whether higher screw density constructs improved curve correction and maintenance of correction in Lenke 2 AIS. Secondary goals were to identify predictive factors for correction and postoperative magnitude of curves in Lenke 2 AIS. Methods We identified patients 11 to 17 years old who underwent primary PSF for Lenke 2 AIS between 2007 and 2017 who had minimum follow-up of 2 years. Demographic and radiographic data were collected to perform regression and elimination analysis. Results Thirty patients (21 females, 9 males) were analyzed. Average age and SD at time of surgery was 14.0 ± 1.8 years (range, 11–17 years), and median follow-up was 2.8 years (IQR 2.1–4.0 years). Implant density did not predict final postoperative curve magnitude. Predictors of final postoperative curve magnitude were sex and preoperative curve magnitude. Predictors of percentage of correction of major curve were sex and age at the time of surgery. Predictors of final postoperative thoracic kyphosis were sex and percent flexibility preop. Females had lower final postoperative major curve magnitude, a higher percent curve correction, and lower postoperative thoracic kyphosis. Conclusions Increased implant density is not predictive of postoperative curve magnitude in Lenke 2 AIS. Predictors of postoperative curve magnitude are sex and preoperative curve magnitude. Level of evidence Level III, retrospective observational

“Higher Pedicle Screw Density Does Not Result in Improved Curve Correction in Lenke 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis”

Purpose: Higher pedicle screw density posterior spinal fusion (PSF) constructs have not been shown to result in improved curve correction in Lenke 1 and 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) but do increase cost. The purpose of this study questioned whether higher screw density constructs improved curve correction and maintenance of correction in Lenke 2 AIS. Secondary goals were to identify predictive factors for correction and postoperative magnitude of curves in Lenke 2 AIS. Methods: We identified patients 11 to 17 years old who underwent primary PSF for Lenke 2 AIS between 2007 and 2017 who had minimum follow up of 2 years. Demographic and radiographic data were collected to perform regression and elimination analysis. Results: Thirty patients (21 Female, 9 male) were analyzed. Average age and SD at time of surgery was 14.0 ± 1.8 years (range, 11-17 years) and median follow-up was 2.8 years (IQR 2.1-4.0 years). Implant density did not predict final postoperative curve magnitude. Predictors of final postoperative curve magnitude were sex and preoperative curve magnitude. Predictors of percentage of correction of major curve were sex and age at the time of surgery. Predictors of final postoperative thoracic kyphosis were sex and percent flexibility preop. Females had lower final postoperative major curve magnitude, a higher percent curve correction, and lower postoperative thoracic kyphosis.Conclusions: Increased implant density is not predictive of postoperative curve magnitude in Lenke 2 AIS. Predictors of postoperative curve magnitude are sex and preoperative curve magnitude.Level of Evidence: Level III Retrospective Observational

Implant Distribution Versus Implant Density in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Does the Position of the Screw Matter?

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that increased implant density (ID) results in improved coronal deformity correction. However, low-density constructs with strategically placed fixation points may achieve similar coronal correction. The purpose of this study was to identify key zones along the spinal fusion where high ID statistically correlated to improved coronal deformity correction. Our hypothesis was that high ID within the periapical zone would not be associated with increased percent Cobb correction. Methods: We identified patients with Lenke type 1 curves with a minimum 2-year follow up. The instrumented vertebral levels were divided into 4 zones: (1) cephalad zone, (2) caudal zone, (3) apical zone, and (4) periapical zone. High and low percent Cobb correction groups were compared, high percent Cobb group was defined as percent correction >67%. Total ID, total concave ID, total convex ID, and ID within each zone of the curve were compared between the groups. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for coronal correction. Subsequently increased and decreased thoracic kyphosis (TK) groups were compared, increased TK was defined as post-operative TK being larger than preoperative TK and decreased TK was defined as post-operative TK being less than preoperative TK. Results: The cohort included 68 patients. The high percent Cobb group compared with the low percent Cobb group had significantly greater ID for the entire construct, the total concave side, the total convex side, the apical convex zone, the periapical zone, and the cephalad concave zone. The high percent Cobb group had greater pedicle screw density for the total construct, total convex side, and total concave side. In the multivariate model ID and pedicle screw density remained significant for percent Cobb correction. Ability to achieve coronal balance was not statistically correlated to ID ( P = .78). Conclusions: Increased ID for the entire construct, the entire convex side, the entire concave side, and within each spinal zone was associated with improved percent Cobb correction. The ability to achieve coronal balance was not statistically influence by ID. The results of this study support that increasing ID along the entire length of the construct improves percent Cobb correction.

Essential lordosis revisited

Aims Significant correction of an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the coronal plane through a posterior approach is associated with hypokyphosis. Factors such as the magnitude of the preoperative coronal curve, the use of hooks, number of levels fused, preoperative kyphosis, screw density, and rod type have all been implicated. Maintaining the normal thoracic kyphosis is important as hypokyphosis is associated with proximal junctional failure (PJF) and early onset degeneration of the spine. The aim of this study was to determine if coronal correction per se was the most relevant factor in generating hypokyphosis. Methods A total of 95 patients (87% female) with a median age of 14 years were included in our study. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were measured and the operative data including upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), metal density, and thoracic flexibility noted. Further analysis of the post-surgical coronal outcome (group 1 < 60% correction and group 2 ≥ 60%) were studied for their association with the postoperative kyphosis in the sagittal plane using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results Of the 95 patients, 71.6% (68) had a thoracic correction of > 60%. Most (97.8%) had metal density < 80%, while thoracic flexibility > 50% was found in 30.5% (29). Preoperative hypokyphosis (< 20°) was present in 25.3%. A postoperative thoracic hypokyphosis was four times more likely to occur in patients with thoracic correction ≥ 60% (odds ratio (OR) 4.08; p = 0.005), after adjusting for confounding variables. This association was not affected by metal density, thoracic flexibility, LIV, UIV, age, or sex. Conclusion Our study supports the ‘essential lordosis’ hypothesis of Roaf and Dickson, i.e. with a greater ability to translate the apical vertebra towards the midline, there is a commensurate lengthening of the anterior column due to the vertebral wedging. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):513–518.

Utilization of Offset Iliac Connectors as Anchoring Sites in Severe Rigid Scoliosis: New Technique

Study Design: This was a prospective cohort study. Objectives: To introduce the iliac connectors as fixation options in spinal constructs used for correction of severe scoliosis at locations other than the lumbopelvic region. Methods: Nine patients with severe rigid scoliosis undergoing surgical release and posterior instrumentation in the period between January 2013 and January 2015 were included in this prospective cohort study. Mean age was 18.4 years; 8 had triple structural curves, and the remaining patient had double structural curves. Cobb angles of the primary and compensatory curves were compared with the immediate, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative measurements using the F test, with P value ≤.05 indicating statistical significance. Screw densities of the final constructs were calculated and compared with the screw densities when the offset iliac connectors were not used. Results: One to 4 offset iliac connectors were used in all 9 patients, increasing screw density by a mean of 6.24 ( P < .001). The mean Cobb angle of the major curve was corrected from 98.44° to 58.2° ( P < .001), that of the first compensatory curve, from 56.55° to 38.33° ( P < .001), and that of the second compensatory curve, from 40.75° to 26.63° ( P < .001). There were no intraoperative neurological complications. After a mean follow-up of 30.6 months, the construct remained stable in all patients with no loss of correction. Conclusion: Offset iliac connectors can be a valuable tool to increase screw density in correction of severe scoliosis, thus increasing overall biomechanical strength of the final construct.

ROTATION ASSESSMENT IN ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WITH ROD DEROTATION

ABSTRACT Objective: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is characterized by rotational and lateral deformity of the spine. The measurement of vertebral rotation is important for prognosis and treatment. Our objective was to evaluate whether the Nash-Moe method can be used to measure axial deformity correction with surgical treatment using the rod derotation maneuver at both the apex and extremities of the deformity in patients with AIS. Methods: Rotation was assessed using the Nash and Moe criteria, on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. We also evaluated the severity on the coronal plane using the Cobb method, ratio of correction achieved, screw density, and number of vertebrae involved in the instrumentation. Results: The Cobb method correction average was 54.8%. When we disregarded vertebrae that presented preoperative Nash-Moe grade 0, the average measurable correction was 54.5% in the first non-instrumented vertebra above, 69.2% in the first instrumented vertebra, 32.2% in the apical vertebra, 36.8% in the last instrumented vertebra, and 30% in the first non-instrumented vertebra below. In our study, 32.14% of the patients presented a measurable correction in the apical vertebra. Conclusion: On the axial plane, correction can be satisfactorily evaluated using the Nash-Moe method. Level of Evidence VI. Case Series.