Background:
Currently, post-resuscitative care for survivors of cardiac arrest (CA) is independent of the etiology of CA. We have previously reported that asphyxial CA (ACA) results in different injury pattern vs. ventricular fibrillation CA (VFCA). Exploration of the early inflammatory response could identify insult-specific targets for future therapies. We hypothesized that the early systemic and regional neuroinflammatory cytokine response could differ between ACA vs. VFCA.
Methods:
Adult male rats were subjected to a 10 min ACA, or 10 min VFCA (n=12/group). Naives (n=12) and shams (n=12) subjected to anesthesia and instrumentation but not CA served as controls. Serum, heart and regional brain cytokine signatures were assessed in selectively vulnerable brain regions: cerebellum, cortex, hippocampus and striatum at 3 h. NSE, S100b and troponin T were also assessed.
Results:
Asphyxiation produced an ~4 min period of severe hypoxemia followed by a no-flow duration of ~ 6±1 min. VF immediately induced no-flow. Brain cytokines in naïve rats were low or undetectable. Shams had a modest effect on selected cytokines. Both ACA and VFCA resulted in robust selected cytokine responses in serum, heart and brain (Fig. 1) with significant regional differences in brain that identified striatum as a selective neuroinflammatory target. No significant differences in cytokines between CA models were observed. NSE, S100b and troponin T were similarly increased after ACA and VFCA vs. naives and/or shams.
Conclusions:
Both models of CA resulted in marked systemic, heart and brain cytokine response. Biomarkers of organ injury were also comparable. Contrasting prior studies showing greater oxidative stress and brain injury in ACA, but greater hemodynamic impairment after VFCA, systemic and brain cytokine profiles revealed similar increases across insults, suggesting that the cytokine response may not mediate key secondary injury differences between these two CA phenotypes.