vacuum biopsy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

32
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-318
Author(s):  
Christophe Tourasse ◽  
Elina Khasanova ◽  
Philippe Sebag ◽  
Jean Paul Beregi

Objective: In this study, we aimed to analyze technical and diagnostic potential, and safety of the small-caliber vacuum-assisted biopsy (SCVAB) device in a multicenter consecutive study taking into consideration the type and location of breast lesion. Methods: We collected data from 5 breast imaging centers where radiologists used the SCVAB device for biopsies in 162 patients. We analyzed the conditions for using the SCVAB device according to the characteristics of the lesions, the volume of excision, and the analyzability obtained by biopsy samples. Results: The biopsies of 80 circumscribed masses, 61 complex lesions, and 24 microcalcification foci were included in the study. The reasons for choosing SCVAB as an initial technique were identified. A total of 47 lesions were removed with SCVAB; among them, 24 lesions were initially chosen for total excision. SCVAB was used as a second-choice biopsy method after core-needle biopsy failure in 20 cases. If SCVAB had not been available, vacuum-assisted biopsy would have been the most frequently used technique (106 under ultrasound, and 18 under stereotactical guidance). Conclusions: The SCVAB system is an alternative to classical vacuum biopsy, enabling representative samples to be obtained from lesions that are difficult to access, complex, small, or in cases of unsuccessful previous biopsy. The SCVAB system was determined as the chosen technique by the radiologists in this study due to feasibility, ergonomics and absence of side effects detected in this study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christin Madjar ◽  
James Seabert ◽  
Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff ◽  
Christian Gustmann ◽  
Isabell Hoffmann ◽  
...  

AbstractWith improvements in breast imaging and minimally invasive interventions, detection of early breast cancer has increased. However, with the improved diagnostic capabilities, the risk of false-positive benign lesions as well as lesions classified as B3 by histopathology has also increased. Varying rates of malignancies are associated with B3 lesions, raising the question of whether such lesions should always be surgically removed. The results of our retrospective analysis should assist in this decision-making process.307 core needle or vacuum-assisted needle biopsies in which B3 lesions were found were examined. The most common lesions were intraductal papillomas (44 %), atypical ductal hyperplasia (22.8 %), flat epithelial atypia (9.4 %), phyllodes tumours (6.5 %), radial scars (5.9 %), LIN 1 (4.9 %), complex fibroadenomas (3.3 %) and LIN 2 (1.6 %). The frequencies depended considerably on whether the tissue was obtained by core biopsy or vacuum biopsy. Stereotactic vacuum biopsy was generally performed in the case of microcalcification not apparent on sonography. Lesions visible on ultrasound had core needle biopsy.Surgery was performed in 254 cases and a malignancy was found in 27.2 % on the final histopathology. Malignancy was found in 24.6 % of 114 cases initially diagnosed as intraductal papilloma. Similarly, cancer was discovered in 48.4 % of the 62 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia, in 2.4 % of the 41 cases of flat epithelial atypia, complex fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour, in 20.7 % of the 29 cases of LIN 1 and radial scar as well as in 50 % of the 8 cases of LIN 2, adenomyoepithelioma and atypical apocrine metaplasia.These data indicate the necessity for complete surgical removal of a B3 lesion when it is discovered using the core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy technique. The decision not to perform surgery can be made when the risk of associated malignancy is deemed low in the clinical pathology conference, but careful follow-up is essential.


Breast Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Paepke ◽  
Stephan Metz ◽  
Anika Brea Salvago ◽  
Ralf Ohlinger

With improvements in breast imaging, mammography, ultrasound and minimally invasive interventions, the detection of early breast cancer, non-invasive cancers, lesions of uncertain malignant potential, and benign lesions has increased. However, with the improved diagnostic capabilities comes a substantial risk of false-positive benign lesions and vice versa false-negative malignant lesions. A statement is provided on the manifestation, imaging, and diagnostic verification of isolated benign breast tumours that have a frequent manifestation, in addition to general therapy management recommendations. Histological evaluation of benign breast tumours is the most reliable diagnostic method. According to the S3 guideline and information gained from analysis of the literature, preference is to be given to core biopsy for each type of tumour as the preferred diagnostic method. An indication for open biopsy is also to be established should the tumour increase in size in the follow-up interval, after recurring discrepancies in the vacuum biopsy results, or at the request of the patient. As an alternative, minimally invasive procedures such as therapeutic vacuum biopsy, cryoablation or high-intensity focused ultrasound are also becoming possible alternatives in definitive surgical management. The newer minimally invasive methods show an adequate degree of accuracy and hardly any restrictions in terms of post-interventional cosmetics so that current requirements of extensive breast imaging can be thoroughly met.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean M. Seely ◽  
Raman Verma ◽  
Ania Kielar ◽  
Karl R. Smyth ◽  
Kalesha Hack ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrew Barnett ◽  
Patrick W. McLaughlin ◽  
Haojun Zheng ◽  
Jason Z. Moore

This paper explores the benefits of vacuum assistance to 18 gauge needle biopsy. Current biopsy methods are inefficient or have a high rate of failure, causing the need for further painful insertions. A novel needle insertion device was developed to create the vacuum in the needle. Using multiple pneumatic cylinders, a vacuum is created inside the end-cut needle by retracting the trocar while inserting the needle. Calculations were done to determine the force caused by the vacuum. Experiments inserting the needle into porcine kidney have shown that the vacuum assistance increases cutting efficiency.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (04) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hahn ◽  
U. Krainick-Strobel ◽  
T. Toellner ◽  
J. Gissler ◽  
S. Kluge ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: The vacuum biopsy of the breast under sonographic guidance (VB) was introduced in Germany in the year 2000 and the first consensus recommendations were published by Krainick-Strobel et al. in 2005. Since then, many clinical studies on this technique have been published. The purpose of this publication is to update the consensus recommendations from 2005 regarding the latest literature. Materials and Methods: The consensus statements were the result of two preliminary meetings after the review of the latest literature by members of the Minimally Invasive Breast Intervention Study Group from the German Society of Senology. The final consensus text was review by all members of the working group. The statements listed under results obtained complete acceptance (consensus 100 %). Results: The consensus recommendations describe the indications, investigator qualifications, technical requirements, documentation, quality assurance and follow-up intervals regarding the latest literature. Conclusion: The VB is a safe method for extracting breast tissue for histological workup. The technique allows the resection of breast tissue up to 8 cm3. Besides the diagnostic indications, the method qualifies for a therapeutic resection of symptomatic benign lesions (e. g. fibroadenomas). The technique should be used in specialized breast centers working in a multidisciplinary setup. This paper is an expert’s recommendation for the use of VB under sonographic guidance. It is not formulated as a nationwide guideline.


2012 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. e739-e745 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.K.W. Schaefer ◽  
B.M. Order ◽  
C. Eckmann-Scholz ◽  
A. Strauss ◽  
F. Hilpert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document