type ii radio bursts
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

125
(FIVE YEARS 30)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 923 (2) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Artem Koval ◽  
Marian Karlický ◽  
Aleksander Stanislavsky ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Miroslav Bárta ◽  
...  

Abstract The space weather effects in the near-Earth environment as well as in atmospheres of other terrestrial planets arise by corpuscular radiation from the Sun, known as the solar wind. The solar magnetic fields govern the solar corona structure. Magnetic-field strength values in the solar wind sources—key information for modeling and forecasting the space weather climate—are derived from various solar space- and ground-based observations, but so far not accounting for specific types of radio bursts. These are “fractured” type II radio bursts attributed to collisions of shock waves with coronal structures emitting the solar wind. Here, we report on radio observations of two “fractured” type II bursts to demonstrate a novel tool for probing of magnetic-field variations in the solar wind sources. These results have a direct impact on interpretations of this class of bursts and contribute to the current studies of the solar wind emitters.


2021 ◽  
Vol 922 (2) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Hegedus ◽  
Ward B. Manchester ◽  
Justin C. Kasper

Abstract The most intense solar energetic particle events are produced by coronal mass ejections (CMEs) accompanied by intense type II radio bursts below 15 MHz. Understanding where these type II bursts are generated relative to an erupting CME would reveal important details of particle acceleration near the Sun, but the emission cannot be imaged on Earth due to distortion from its ionosphere. Here, a technique is introduced to identify the likely source location of the emission by comparing the dynamic spectrum observed from a single spacecraft against synthetic spectra made from hypothesized emitting regions within a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) numerical simulation of the recreated CME. The radio-loud 2005 May 13 CME was chosen as a test case, with Wind/WAVES radio data being used to frame the inverse problem of finding the most likely progression of burst locations. An MHD recreation is used to create synthetic spectra for various hypothesized burst locations. A framework is developed to score these synthetic spectra by their similarity to the type II frequency profile derived from the Wind/WAVES data. Simulated areas with 4× enhanced entropy and elevated de Hoffmann–Teller velocities are found to produce synthetic spectra similar to spacecraft observations. A geometrical analysis suggests the eastern edge of the entropy-derived shock around (−30°, 0°) was emitting in the first hour of the event before falling off, and the western/southwestern edge of the shock centered around (6°, −12°) was a dominant area of radio emission for the 2 hr of simulation data out to 20 solar radii.


2021 ◽  
Vol 922 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Gennady Chernov ◽  
Valery Fomichev

Abstract Type II solar radio bursts are among the most powerful events in the solar radio emission in the meter wavelength range. It is generally accepted that the agents generating type II radio bursts are magnetohydrodynamic shock waves. But the relationship between the shock waves and the other manifestations of the large-scale disturbances in the solar atmosphere (coronal mass ejections, Morton waves, EUW waves) remains unclear. To clarify a problem, it is important to determine the conditions of generation of type II radio bursts. Here, the model of the radio source is based on the generation of radio emission within the front of the collisionless shock wave where the Buneman instability of plasma waves is developed. In the frame of this model, the Alfvén magnetic Mach number must exceed the critical value, and there is a strict restriction on the perpendicularity of the front. The model allows us to obtain the information about the parameters of the shock waves and the parameters of the medium by the parameters of type II bursts. The estimates, obtained in this paper for several events with the band splitting of the fundamental and harmonic emission bands of the type II bursts, confirm the necessary conditions of the model. In this case the registration of type II radio bursts is an indication of the propagation of shock waves in the solar atmosphere, and the absence of type II radio bursts is not an indication of the absence of shock waves. Such a situation should be taken into account when investigating the relationship between type II radio bursts and other manifestations of solar activity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (09) ◽  
pp. 52-64
Author(s):  
Raveesha K.H ◽  
◽  
Vedavathi P ◽  
Vijayakumar H Doddamani ◽  
◽  
...  

Type II radio bursts are known to be the signatures of coronal shocks. In this paper we examine the relationship between 129 type II bursts in the frequency range 35 – 450 MHz observed at Culgooora observatory during May 2002 – October 2015 and the associated CMEs. We apply Newkirk (1961) density model to determine the formation height of type IIs. We find that in 109/129 cases, type II bursts were preceded/ succeeded by CMEs. The CME associated type II events in which the CME height is above the type II burst source are categorized as group I events (91/129 cases). 91% of the bursts in this group are also associated with flares and 58% of these bursts originate during decaying phase of the flare. The correlation between CME speed and type II shock speed for limb events in this group is 0.33.The CME associated type IIs in which the CME height is below the type II source are categorized as group II (18/129 cases). CME driven shock could have been the exciter of these type II bursts.88% of this group events are associated with flares and 62% of these bursts originate during the rising phase of the flare. The correlation between CME speed and type II shock speed for limb events in this group is 0.96. In 20/129 cases of our data set, type II bursts are not associated with CME and are categorized as group III. 90% of the bursts in this group are associated with flares. 77% of the bursts in the group are originating in the decaying phase of flares. Poor temporal association (9/69 cases) between type IIs and flares of X class during this period. Our results suggest that inspite of temporal association with metric type II bursts, majority of the CME driven shocks (84%) are not successful in exciting type II bursts in 35-450 MHz domain. The type II bursts temporally correlated with CMEs and likely to have been excited by CMEs (type II height > CME height) are originating during the rising phase of the flares in majority of the events. In case of type II bursts temporally correlated with CMEs supposedly not excited by the CMEs (type II height < CME height) ,majority of them are originating in the decaying phase of flares.


2021 ◽  
Vol 913 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Athanasios Kouloumvakos ◽  
Alexis Rouillard ◽  
Alexander Warmuth ◽  
Jasmina Magdalenic ◽  
Immanuel. C. Jebaraj ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciara Maguire ◽  
Eoin Carley ◽  
Pietro Zucca ◽  
Nicole Vilmer ◽  
Peter Gallagher

&lt;p&gt;The Sun produces highly dynamic and eruptive events that can drive shocks through the corona. These shocks can accelerate electrons, which result in plasma emission in the form of a type II radio burst. Despite a large number of type II radio bursts observations, the precise origin of coronal shocks is still subject to investigation. Here we present a well-observed solar eruptive event that occurred on 16 October 2015, focusing on a jet observed in the extreme ultraviolet by the SDO Atmospheric Imaging Assembly, a streamer observed in white-light by the Large Angle and&amp;#160; Spectrometric Coronagraph, and a metric type II radio burst observed by the LOw-Frequency Array (LOFAR) radio telescope. For the first time, LOFAR has interferometrically imaged the fundamental and harmonic sources of a type II radio burst and revealed that the sources did not appear to be co-spatial, as would be expected from the plasma emission mechanism. We correct for the separation between the fundamental and harmonic using a model which accounts for the scattering of radio waves by electron density fluctuations in a turbulent plasma. This allows us to show the type II radio sources were located &amp;#8764;0.5 R&lt;sub&gt;sun&lt;/sub&gt; above the jet and propagated at a speed of &amp;#8764;1000 km s&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;1&lt;/sup&gt;, which was significantly faster than the jet speed of &amp;#8764;200 km s&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;1&lt;/sup&gt;. This suggests that the type II burst was generated by a piston shock driven by the jet in the low corona.&lt;/p&gt;


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Carley ◽  
Baptiste Cecconi ◽  
Hamish Reid ◽  
Carine Briand ◽  
K. Sasikumar Raja ◽  
...  

&lt;p&gt;Eruptive activity in the solar corona can often lead to the propagation of shockwaves. In the radio domain&amp;#160;the primary signature of such shocks are type II radio bursts, observed in dynamic spectra as bands of emission&amp;#160;slowly drifting towards lower frequencies over time. These radio bursts can sometimes have inhomogeneous and fragmented&amp;#160;fine structure, but the cause of this fine structure is currently unclear. Here we observe several type II&amp;#160;radio bursts on 2019-March-20th using the New Extension in Nancay Upgrading LOFAR (NenuFAR), a radio interferometer observing between 10-85 MHz. We show &amp;#160;that the distribution of size-scales of density perturbations associated with the fine structure of one type II follows a power law with a spectral index of -1.71, which closely matches the value of -5/3 expected of fully developed turbulence. We determine this turbulence to be upstream of the shock, in background coronal plasma at a heliocentric distance of ~2 R&lt;sub&gt;sun&lt;/sub&gt;. The observed inertial size-scales of the turbulent density inhomogeneities range from ~62 Mm to ~209 km. This shows that type II fine structure and fragmentation can be due to shock propagation through an inhomogeneous and turbulent coronal plasma, and we discuss the implications of this on electron acceleration in the coronal shock.&lt;/p&gt;


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document