Abstract
Background
Cough variant asthma (CVA) is one of the special populations of asthma. The study was to compare spirometric parameters of small airways and the degree of bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) between CVA and classic asthma (CA), and examine the relationship between BHR and small airways to determine the accuracy of these markers as indicators of CVA.
Methods
A total of 825 asthmatic patients were screened for the study and 614 were included. All patients performed spirometry and underwent a bronchial challenge with methacholine. It has been estimated that less than 65% of the small airways must be obstructed before changes can be detected using routine pulmonary function tests.
Results
CVA patients showed less small airway dysfunction (< 65%) than those of CA patients with MMEF% predicted (70% vs 80.91%, p = 0.002) and FEF50% predicted (62.71% vs 73.5%, p = 0.004). The function of small airways was higher in the CVA group compared with the CA group (p < 0.001). CVA patients had a mild BHR (p = 0.005). Significant positive correlations were observed between PD20 and MMEF% predicted (r = 0.282, p < 0.001), FEF50% predicted (r = 0.2522, p < 0.001), FEF75% predicted (r = 0.2504, p < 0.001) in patients with CVA. The area under curve of MMEF, FEF50 and FEF75 (% predicted) was 0.615, 0.621, 0.606, respectively. 0.17mcg of PD20 was the best diagnostic value for CVA with an AUC of 0.582 (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
Small airway dysfunction is milder showed in CVA. The value of BHR combined with small airways in CVA prediction, which reflected significant, but not enough to be clinically useful.