catecholaminergic transmission
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 4122
Author(s):  
Kouji Fukuyama ◽  
Tomosuke Nakano ◽  
Takashi Shiroyama ◽  
Motohiro Okada

It has been established that the selective α2A adrenoceptor agonist guanfacine reduces hyperactivity and improves cognitive impairment in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The major mechanisms of guanfacine are considered to involve the activation of the postsynaptic α2A adrenoceptor of glutamatergic pyramidal neurons in the frontal cortex, but the effects of chronic guanfacine administration on catecholaminergic and glutamatergic transmissions associated with the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are yet to be clarified. The actions of guanfacine on catecholaminergic transmission, the effects of acutely local and systemically chronic (for 7 days) administrations of guanfacine on catecholamine release in pathways from the locus coeruleus (LC) to OFC, the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and reticular thalamic-nucleus (RTN), from VTA to OFC, from RTN to the mediodorsal thalamic-nucleus (MDTN), and from MDTN to OFC were determined using multi-probe microdialysis with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. Additionally, the effects of chronic guanfacine administration on the expression of the α2A adrenoceptor in the plasma membrane fraction of OFC, VTA and LC were examined using a capillary immunoblotting system. The acute local administration of therapeutically relevant concentrations of guanfacine into the LC decreased norepinephrine release in the OFC, VTA and RTN without affecting dopamine release in the OFC. Systemically, chronic administration of therapeutically relevant doses of guanfacine for 14 days increased the basal release of norepinephrine in the OFC, VTA, RTN, and dopamine release in the OFC via the downregulation of the α2A adrenoceptor in the LC, OFC and VTA. Furthermore, systemically, chronic guanfacine administration did not affect intrathalamic GABAergic transmission, but it phasically enhanced thalamocortical glutamatergic transmission. The present study demonstrated the dual actions of guanfacine on catecholaminergic transmission—acute attenuation of noradrenergic transmission and chronic enhancement of noradrenergic transmission and thalamocortical glutamatergic transmission. These dual actions of guanfacine probably contribute to the clinical effects of guanfacine against ADHD.


Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Okada ◽  
Kouji Fukuyama

Noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate/glutamate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and mood disorders but improve monoaminergic antidepressant-resistant mood disorder and suicidal ideation. The mechanisms of the double-edged sword clinical action of NMDAR antagonists remained to be clarified. The present study determined the interaction between the NMDAR antagonist (MK801), α1 adrenoceptor antagonist (prazosin), and α2A adrenoceptor agonist (guanfacine) on mesocortical and mesothalamic catecholaminergic transmission, and thalamocortical glutamatergic transmission using multiprobe microdialysis. The inhibition of NMDAR in the locus coeruleus (LC) by local MK801 administration enhanced both the mesocortical noradrenergic and catecholaminergic coreleasing (norepinephrine and dopamine) transmissions. The mesothalamic noradrenergic transmission was also enhanced by local MK801 administration in the LC. These mesocortical and mesothalamic transmissions were activated by intra-LC disinhibition of transmission of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) via NMDAR inhibition. Contrastingly, activated mesothalamic noradrenergic transmission by MK801 enhanced intrathalamic GABAergic inhibition via the α1 adrenoceptor, resulting in the suppression of thalamocortical glutamatergic transmission. The thalamocortical glutamatergic terminal stimulated the presynaptically mesocortical catecholaminergic coreleasing terminal in the superficial cortical layers, but did not have contact with the mesocortical selective noradrenergic terminal (which projected terminals to deeper cortical layers). Furthermore, the α2A adrenoceptor suppressed the mesocortical and mesothalamic noradrenergic transmissions somatodendritically in the LC and presynaptically/somatodendritically in the reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN). These discrepancies between the noradrenergic and catecholaminergic transmissions in the mesocortical and mesothalamic pathways probably constitute the double-edged sword clinical action of noncompetitive NMDAR antagonists.


2013 ◽  
Vol 304 (7) ◽  
pp. R514-R522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Benincasa Herr ◽  
Georg M. Stettner ◽  
Leszek Kubin

Persons affected by obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have increased arterial blood pressure and elevated activity in upper airway muscles. Many cardiorespiratory features of OSA have been reproduced in rodents subjected to chronic-intermittent hypoxia (CIH). We previously reported that, following exposure to CIH, rats have increased noradrenergic terminal density in brain stem sensory and motor nuclei and upregulated expression of the excitatory α1-adrenergic receptors in the hypoglossal motor nucleus. This suggested that CIH may enhance central catecholaminergic transmission. We now quantified c-Fos expression in different groups of pontomedullary catecholaminergic neurons as an indirect way of assessing their baseline activity in rats subjected to CIH or sham treatment (7 AM-5 PM daily for 35 days). One day after the last CIH exposure, the rats were gently kept awake for 2.5 h and then were anesthetized and perfused, and their pontomedullary brain sections were subjected to dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH) and c-Fos immunohistochemistry. DBH-positive cells were counted in the A1/C1, A2/C2, A5, subcoeruleus (sub-C) and A7 groups of catecholaminergic neurons, and the percentages of those expressing c-Fos were determined. We found that fewer DBH cells expressed c-Fos in CIH- than in sham-treated rats in the medulla (significant in the A1 group). In the pons (rostral A5, sub-C, and A7), c-Fos expression did not differ between the CIH- and sham-treated animals. We suggest that, when measured 20 h after the last CIH exposure, catecholaminergic transmission is enhanced through terminal sprouting and receptor upregulation rather than through increased baseline activity in pontomedullary catecholaminergic neurons.


2008 ◽  
Vol 294 (3) ◽  
pp. R905-R914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Perfume ◽  
Sabrina L. Nabhen ◽  
Karla Riquelme Barrera ◽  
María G. Otero ◽  
Liliana G. Bianciotti ◽  
...  

Brain catecholamines are involved in the regulation of biological functions, including cardiovascular activity. The hypothalamus presents areas with high density of catecholaminergic neurons and the endothelin system. Two hypothalamic regions intimately related with the cardiovascular control are distinguished: the anterior (AHR) and posterior (PHR) hypothalamus, considered to be sympathoinhibitory and sympathoexcitatory regions, respectively. We previously reported that endothelins (ETs) are involved in the short-term tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) regulation in both the AHR and PHR. TH is crucial for catecholaminergic transmission and is tightly regulated by well-characterized mechanisms. In the present study, we sought to establish the effects and underlying mechanisms of ET-1 and ET-3 on TH long-term modulation. Results showed that in the AHR, ETs decreased TH activity through ETB receptor activation coupled to the nitric oxide, phosphoinositide, and CaMK-II pathways. They also reduced total TH level and TH phosphorylated forms (Ser 19 and 40). Conversely, in the PHR, ETs increased TH activity through a G protein-coupled receptor, likely an atypical ET receptor or the ETC receptor, which stimulated the phosphoinositide and adenylyl cyclase pathways, as well as CaMK-II. ETs also increased total TH level and the Ser 19, 31, and 40 phosphorylated sites of the enzyme. These findings support that ETs are involved in the long-term regulation of TH activity, leading to reduced sympathoinhibition in the AHR and increased sympathoexcitation in the PHR. Present and previous studies may partially explain the cardiovascular effects produced by ETs when applied to the brain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document