O-OGC08 The Impact of Anastomotic Techniques on Post-operative Anastomotic Complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA)

Background The optimal anastomotic techniques in esophagectomy to minimize rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) are not known. The aim of this study was to assess whether anastomotic technique is associated with anastomotic failure after esophagectomy in the international Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) cohort. Methods This prospective observational multicenter cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer over nine months in 2018. The primary exposure was the anastomotic technique, classified as handsewn, linear stapled or circular stapled. The primary outcome was a composite of AL and CN, as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to identify the strength of association between anastomotic techniques and anastomotic failure. Results Of the 2238 esophagectomies, the anastomosis was handsewn in 27.1%, linear stapled in 21.0% and circular stapled in 51.9%. Anastomotic techniques differed significantly between the anastomosis site (p < 0.001), with the majority of neck anastomoses being handsewn (69.9%), whilst most chest anastomoses were stapled (66.3% circular stapled, 19.3% linear stapled). Rates of AL/CN differed significantly between the anastomotic techniques (p < 0.001), from 19.3% in handsewn anastomoses, to 14.0% in linear stapled, and 12.1% in circular stapled. This was confirmed by multivariable analysis (Odds ratio (OR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.86) for circular stapled vs. handsewn anastomosis. However, subgroup analysis by anastomosis site suggested that this effect was predominantly present in neck anastomoses, with AL/CN rates of 23.2% vs. 14.6% vs 5.9% for handsewn vs. linear stapled anastomoses vs circular stapled, compared to 13.7% vs. 13.8% vs 12.2% in chest anastomoses. Conclusions Handsewn anastomoses appear to be associated with higher rates of anastomotic failure for anastomoses in the neck. However, anastomotic failure rates in the chest were similar across techniques and there was no significant difference on multivariable analysis. Further research into standardization of approach and techniques may further improve outcomes.

Comparison of stapler and handsewn anastomosis techniques in creating an ileal conduit following radical cystectomy

Background and objective: Ileal conduit for urinary diversion can be completed using either end-to-end handsewn or stapled anastomosis. This study aimed to compare stepled and handsewn anastomosis methods in terms of complications, hospitalization and cost. Materials and methods: Forty-three patients were included in the hand-sewn and 44 patients in the stapler group. After creating an ileal conduit, continuity of the loop was achieved either with handsewn or stapler method. Patients' demographic data, time to onset of bowel movement, time to transit to oral intake, time to removal of the drain, perioperative and postoperative complications, mortality and total costs were retrospectively recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean to the onset of bowel movements (p = 0.51) and the mean time to transit to oral intake (p = 0.23). The mean time to removal of the drain was significantly lower in the stapler group (p = 0.023). Perioperative complications were seen in eight patients in the handsewn group, while none of the patients in the stapler group developed perioperative complication (p = 0.003). Postoperative complications were similar between both groups (p = 0.75). The duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly lower in the stapler group (p = 0.004) and the mean total cost was statistically significantly more advantageous (p < 0.001). Conclusion: No significant difference was found between stapler and handsewn anastomosis techniques in terms of postoperative complications. On the other hand, hospitalization and total cost were in favour of stapler technique, showing that this technique can be used safely.

Comparison of the incidences of anastomotic leakage when PDSII or LACLON are used in esophago-gastric conduit handsewn anastomosis after esophagectomy

The incidence of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy remains around 10%. It was previously reported that PDSII rapidly loses tensile strength at pH 1.0 and pH 8.5. By contrast, LACLON degradation is reportedly insensitive to pH. We therefore compared LACLON with PDSII for esophago-gastric conduit, layer-to-layer, handsewn anastomosis. Between January 2016 and January 2020, 90 patients who received posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction with layer-to-layer handsewn anastomosis (51 using PDSII and 39 using LACLON) at Akita University Hospital were enrolled. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was significantly lower in the LACLON (2.6%, 1/39 patients) than PDSII group (15.7%, 8/51 patients) (p = 0.0268). Multivariable logistic analysis showed the risk of anastomotic leakage was significantly greater with PDSII than LACLON (odds ratio 11.01; 95% CI 1.326–277.64; p = 0.024). The percentages of time the pH was higher than 8 on the gastric conduit side of the anastomosis were 3.1%, 5.7%, 20.9% and 80.5%, respectively, in the four most recent patients. The present study showed that pH at the anastomosis soon after esophagectomy tends to be alkaline rather than acidic, which raises the possibility that this alkalinity facilitates the deterioration of surgical sutures including PDSII.

How to Prevent Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review

Anastomosis leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is an embarrassing problem. It is associated with poor consequence. This review aims to summarize published evidence on prevention of AL after colorectal surgery and provide recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We conducted bibliographic research on January 15, 2020, of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We retained meta-analysis, reviews, and randomized clinical trials. We concluded that mechanical bowel preparation did not reduce AL. It seems that oral antibiotic or oral antibiotic with mechanical bowel preparation could reduce the risk of AL. The surgical approach did not affect the AL rate. The low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery could reduce the AL rate. The mechanical anastomosis is superior to handsewn anastomosis only in case of right colectomies, with similar results in rectal surgery between the 2 anastomosis techniques. In the case of right colectomies, this anastomosis could be performed intracorporeally or extracorporeally with similar outcomes. The air leak test did not reduce AL. There is no interest of external drainage in colonic surgery but drains reduced the rate of AL and rate of reoperation after low anterior resection. The transanal tube reduced the rate of AL.

Herniation of the caecum and ascending colon through the foramen of Winslow: a case report and review

Approximately 5% of intestinal obstruction cases are caused by internal herniation. Caecal herniation through the foramen of Winslow is considered a rare event. The management of caecal herniation remains challenging due to the lack of literature highlighting this pathology. A 66-year-old woman was admitted with a 24-hour history of epigastric pain radiating to the back. The pain was associated with nausea and vomiting of gastric contents. On examination, the abdomen was soft with mild tenderness but no signs of peritonism or distension. The abdominal x-ray and a computed tomography were in keeping with caecal volvulus and confirmed that the caecum was not in the right iliac fossa. In a midline laparotomy procedure, the ileum, caecum and ascending colon were noted to be herniating into the foramen of Winslow. A right hemicolectomy with a handsewn anastomosis was performed. The foramen of Winslow was not closed. No postoperative complications occurred. A literature review showed a lack of similar cases with no agreed management consensus. The laparotomy approach is comparable to the laparoscopic approach and no caecal herniation recurrence after open/laparoscopic surgical procedures were identified. Awareness of caecal herniation allows early diagnosis and timely surgical management is needed in prevent patient morbidity and mortality.

Ex vivo model for a new bilateral antimesenteric V-modified side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis to prevent recurrence in ileocolic Crohn’s disease

Introduction The high rate of recurrence following ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease may lead to repeat surgery in 20–30% of patients at five years after surgery. Recurrence usually occurs at the anastomosis and the neoterminal ileum and the association of a strictureplasty to widen the bowel lumen in the regions immediately proximal (‘anastomotic inlet’) and distal (‘anastomotic outlet’) to the anastomosis may delay or reduce the risk of surgical recurrence. Materials and methods A side to side isoperistaltic anastomosis, with an associated V-modified strictureplasty on the anti-mesenteric border at the level of the anastomosis inlet and outlet has been designed. We produced a wet lab ex vivo model of the anastomosis and, to evaluate the different calibre of the anastomotic segments, we compared it with ex vivo models of three anastomotic configurations currently used in surgery for Crohn’s disease: i) side to side isoperistaltic anastomosis; ii) modified side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis with double Heineke–Mikulicz procedure (Sasaki anastomosis); iii) anti-mesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn anastomosis (Kono-S anastomosis). Results Differences were recorded at the level of the anastomosis inlet and outlet, with a larger volume estimated in the Sasaki anastomosis and in the V-modified anastomosis. The V-modified anastomosis had a larger volume compared with the Sasaki anastomosis for a longer segment of small bowel. Conclusions We have developed an experimental animal model for a new anastomotic technique which could be applied in surgery for Crohn’s disease following small-bowel or ileocolic resection.