postural tasks
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

67
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Villamar ◽  
Daniel Ludvig ◽  
Eric J Perreault

AbstractThe spinal stretch reflex is a fundamental building block of motor function, modulating sensitivity across tasks to augment volitional control. Stretch reflex sensitivity can vary continuously during movement and changes between movement and posture. While there have been many demonstrations of reflex modulation and investigations into the underlying mechanisms, there have been few attempts to provide simple, quantitative descriptions of the relationship between the volitional control and stretch reflex sensitivity throughout tasks that require the coordinated activity of several muscles. Here we develop such a description and use it to test the hypothesis that the modulation of stretch reflex sensitivity during movement can be explained by the balance of activity within the relevant agonist and antagonist muscles better than by the activity only in the muscle homonymous with the elicited reflex. We applied continuous pseudo-random perturbations of elbow angle as subjects completed approximately 500 movements in elbow flexion and extension. Measurements were averaged across the repeated movements to obtain continuous estimates of stretch reflex amplitude and background muscle activity. We also ran a control experiment on a subset of subjects performing postural tasks at muscle activity levels matched to those measured in the movement task. For both experiments, we assessed the relationship between background activity in the agonist and antagonist muscles controlling elbow movement and the stretch reflexes elicited in them. We found that modulation in the stretch reflexes during movement can be described by modulation of the background activity in the agonist and antagonist muscles, and that models incorporating agonists and antagonists are significantly better than those considering only the homonymous muscle. Increases in agonist muscle activity enhanced stretch reflex sensitivity whereas increases in antagonist activity suppressed reflex activity. Surprisingly, the magnitude of these effects was similar, suggesting a balance of control between agonists and antagonist that is very different than the dominance of sensitivity to agonist activity during postural tasks. This greater relative sensitivity to antagonist background activity during movement is due to a large decrease in sensitivity to homonymous muscle activity during movement rather than substantial changes in the influence of antagonist muscle activity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 1379-1388
Author(s):  
A. Mouthon ◽  
J. Ruffieux ◽  
W. Taube

Abstract Purpose Action observation (AO) during motor imagery (MI), so-called AO + MI, has been proposed as a new form of non-physical training, but the neural mechanisms involved remains largely unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to explore whether there were similarities in the modulation of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) during execution and mental simulation of postural tasks, and if there was a difference in modulation of SICI between AO + MI and AO alone. Method 21 young adults (mean ± SD = 24 ± 6.3 years) were asked to either passively observe (AO) or imagine while observing (AO + MI) or physically perform a stable and an unstable standing task, while motor evoked potentials and SICI were assessed in the soleus muscle. Result SICI results showed a modulation by condition (F2,40 = 6.42, p = 0.009) with less SICI in the execution condition compared to the AO + MI (p = 0.009) and AO (p = 0.002) condition. Moreover, switching from the stable to the unstable stance condition reduced significantly SICI (F1,20 = 8.34, p = 0.009) during both, physically performed (− 38.5%; p = 0.03) and mentally simulated balance (− 10%, p < 0.001, AO + MI and AO taken together). Conclusion The data demonstrate that SICI is reduced when switching from a stable to a more unstable standing task during both real task execution and mental simulation. Therefore, our results strengthen and further support the existence of similarities between executed and mentally simulated actions by showing that not only corticospinal excitability is similarly modulated but also SICI. This proposes that the activity of the inhibitory cortical network during mental simulation of balance tasks resembles the one during physical postural task execution.


Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Germanotta ◽  
Ilaria Mileti ◽  
Ilaria Conforti ◽  
Zaccaria Del Prete ◽  
Irene Aprile ◽  
...  

The estimation of the body’s center of mass (CoM) trajectory is typically obtained using force platforms, or optoelectronic systems (OS), bounding the assessment inside a laboratory setting. The use of magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) allows for more ecological evaluations, and previous studies proposed methods based on either a single sensor or a sensors’ network. In this study, we compared the accuracy of two methods based on MIMUs. Body CoM was estimated during six postural tasks performed by 15 healthy subjects, using data collected by a single sensor on the pelvis (Strapdown Integration Method, SDI), and seven sensors on the pelvis and lower limbs (Biomechanical Model, BM). The accuracy of the two methods was compared in terms of RMSE and estimation of posturographic parameters, using an OS as reference. The RMSE of the SDI was lower in tasks with little or no oscillations, while the BM outperformed in tasks with greater CoM displacement. Moreover, higher correlation coefficients were obtained between the posturographic parameters obtained with the BM and the OS. Our findings showed that the estimation of CoM displacement based on MIMU was reasonably accurate, and the use of the inertial sensors network methods should be preferred to estimate the kinematic parameters.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 942-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Ehsani ◽  
Rozita Hedayati ◽  
Rasool Bagheri ◽  
Shapour Jaberzadeh

Context: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) often presents with a dysfunction in deep abdominal muscles activity during standing tasks. Although some studies indicated that deep abdominal muscle activity improved during some functional tasks following stabilization exercise (SE), there is no study to evaluate the effect of SE on lateral abdominal muscles thickness during standing postural tasks. Objective: The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the lateral abdominal muscles thickness in the participants with CLBP while standing on a balance board and (2) to compare the effects of SE and a general exercise (GE) program on the lateral muscles thickness changes. Methods: This was a between-groups, triple-blinded randomized controlled trial design. In total, 40 females with CLBP were randomly assigned into 2 groups:  GE (control group) and supervised progressive SE (experimental group). Diagnostic ultrasound imaging was used before and after the intervention to measure lateral abdominal muscles thickness during standing on 2 different levels of platform in the Biodex Balance System. Visual analog scale and Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire were used to evaluate changes in pain intensity and disability. Results: The results indicated significant increases in transverse abdominis muscle thickness during all standing tasks (P = .02) and significant decreases in pain intensity and disability following SE intervention (P < .001). However, the lateral abdominal muscle thicknesses were not changed after GE intervention while standing postural tasks (P > .05). The GE group revealed only significant decreases in pain intensity after intervention (P = .03). Conclusion: Supervised progressive SE improved the activity of deep abdominal muscles in standing postural tasks in the patients with CLBP.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 937-937
Author(s):  
Jason M. Avedesian ◽  
Mathew Sunil Varre ◽  
Ryan Tingle ◽  
Janet S. Dufek

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1773-1779
Author(s):  
Amir Shams ◽  
Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi ◽  
Farshid Tahmasbi ◽  
Mandana Sangari
Keyword(s):  

IBRO Reports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. S276
Author(s):  
Alena Militskova ◽  
Elvira Mukhametova ◽  
Leila Zaripova ◽  
Tatiana Baltina

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tjeerd W Boonstra ◽  
Luca Faes ◽  
Jennifer N Kerkman ◽  
Daniele Marinazzo

AbstractThe central nervous system needs to coordinate multiple muscles during postural control. Functional coordination is established through the neural circuitry that interconnects different muscles. Here we used multivariate information decomposition of multichannel EMG acquired from 14 healthy participants during postural tasks to investigate the neural interactions between muscles. A set of information measures were estimated from an instantaneous linear regression model and a time-lagged VAR model fitted to the EMG envelopes of 36 muscles. We used network analysis to quantify the structure of functional interactions between muscles and compared them across experimental conditions. Conditional mutual information and transfer entropy revealed sparse networks dominated by local connections between muscles. We observed significant changes in muscle networks across postural tasks localized to the muscles involved in performing those tasks. Information decomposition revealed distinct patterns in task-related changes: unimanual and bimanual pointing were associated with reduced transfer to the pectoralis major muscles, but an increase in total information compared to no pointing, while postural instability resulted in increased information, information transfer and information storage in the abductor longus muscles compared to normal stability. These findings show robust patterns of directed interactions between muscles that are task-dependent and can be assessed from surface EMG recorded during static postural tasks. We discuss directed muscle networks in terms of the neural circuitry involved in generating muscle activity and suggest that task-related effects may reflect gain modulations of spinal reflex pathways.


2019 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anat V. Lubetzky ◽  
Zhu Wang ◽  
Tal Krasovsky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document